[2012] Green Bay Packers at New York Giants· Page 3

Pack93z
Select Member

12 years ago

I say hold Clay out one more game, but hey, I ain't no doctor.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules

I think if there is a hint of issue.. they will do just that. Especially with the way the collection of understudies, most notably Moses, played this past weekend.

That said, the Giants only give up sacks at a 3.2% clip.. the Packers currently at a 8.3% clip. So if they can apply pressure to Eli, it should help slow down the impact of Cruz in the vertical passing game. That will be vital IMO.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

play2win
Senior Member

12 years ago

#22

I am going to the game. I have never been more excited!

Originally Posted by: cheeseheads123

Cool. Bring home a winner!!!

Yerko
Senior Member

12 years ago

#23

My thought is on the secondary here. While Hakeem Nicks has been underwhelming this season (1 touchdown), he is still a viable threat. So while we have Tramon Williams covering Cruz (or Nicks) we are again, depending on out rookies to make an impact covering another great wide receiver. I don't think the Packers have competed against a team with more than one major threat in the passing game. New Orleans is the only team that possibly comes close.

This will be a true test for our young secondary, more so than any other game. I think they can have a great game.

dfosterf
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#24

15-1 last year, beat 'em in the regular season, the week off, maybe they (NY) were pissed about that reg season loss, etc. etc. etc. We saw the result. We had nothing to be pissed about. After that game, we did. Things are different.

My Green Bay Packers are going to NY and are going to kick the fucking living shit out of the NY Giants, I don't care if we play our 3rd string due to injuries.

nerdmann
Premier Member

12 years ago

#25

Clay won't play.

If he does he will see reduced snaps.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#26

Originally Posted by: dfosterf

I think the emotions of the team were more at factor than an "angry" Giants team. T.J. Lang's father passed away, then days later Joe Philbins son ... that's a lot to take on.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#27

I think this is one of two losses for the regular season for the Packers. I see them losing this one close in the waning moments of the game.

Packers 24
Giants 27

If the Packers pull off some miracle and beat the dominating Giants, I think the only possible hiccup left is @Chicago.

Green Bay Packers leads New York Giants (31-24-2)

cheeseheads123
Member

12 years ago

#28

This game scares me because they are coming off two bad losses and a bye week

Porforis
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#29

Packers run the table versus the division, and they have nothing to worry about. 11-5 would probably be a comfortable way to get in as the wild card, but if those 4 additional wins come versus division foes, I'm confident we've got the division. Bears will probably end up 11-5 or 10-6 and if we beat them again we have the head to head, Vikings aren't a major contender unless they somehow manage to sweep us.

Porforis
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#30

Packers 24
Giants 27

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool

Another Packers win! 🖐

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (26m) : Who? What?

beast (9h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (13h) : meh

Zero2Cool (17h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (17h) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (17h) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (20h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (20h) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (23h) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24