Zero2Cool
12 years ago

BEFORE todays game

brady was 7 behind in TD's and 7 behind in rating.
Brees was tied for TD's but had 9 interceptions and is 10 behind in rating.

so idk

Originally Posted by: gbguy20 



but he said Brees or Manning, not Brady or Brees. 🙂
UserPostedImage
Porforis
12 years ago

I'm really not sure where the dyeah_gb is coming from. Has anyone actually heard criticism of Rodgers unable to comeback in the fourth quarter?

He had come-from-behind wins in the 4th quarter against the Bears in both 2009 wins. I thought that was when we settled the matter: Rodgers could complete 4th quarter comebacks. Hell, he had a come from behind win against the Giants last year in the regular season.

When I think of "complaint" and "Aaron Rodgers" in the same sentence, it is related to Rodgers sometimes holding the ball too long. Not once do I think "cannot complete 4th quarter comeback."

Not really sure what or where the dyeah_gb was going with this thread...

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



Probably referring to this topic and some of the data referenced in the article  linked to within it:

http://packershome.com/yaf_postst14897_The-truth-about-the-front-running-Green-Bay-Packers.aspx 

The record is 3-18 (.143) at fourth-quarter comeback opportunities under Rodgers, which may historically compare best to the forgettable Bill Kenney and the 1980s Chiefs (3-27 record).

Overall, Green Bay is 7-26 (.212) in fourth quarter comeback opportunities since McCarthy became the coach in 2006. That is seven fourth-quarter comebacks in six seasons. The New York Giants produced seven fourth-quarter comebacks in 2011 alone – albeit a number that tied the league single-season record.

dyeah_gb
12 years ago

I'm really not sure where the dyeah_gb is coming from. Has anyone actually heard criticism of Rodgers unable to comeback in the fourth quarter?

He had come-from-behind wins in the 4th quarter against the Bears in both 2009 wins. I thought that was when we settled the matter: Rodgers could complete 4th quarter comebacks. Hell, he had a come from behind win against the Giants last year in the regular season.

When I think of "complaint" and "Aaron Rodgers" in the same sentence, it is related to Rodgers sometimes holding the ball too long. Not once do I think "cannot complete 4th quarter comeback."

Not really sure what or where the dyeah_gb was going with this thread...

Originally Posted by: all_about_da_packers 



Not sure if you are serious or not:

Cold hard facts article 

packershome discussion 

Skip and his musings 


...



The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
Pack93z
12 years ago
I get it.. but I hate it. The deemed worthiness of the freaking stat.

Nevermind the defensive plays that lead up to the drive. Nevermind Finley making a huge play along the sidelines.. screw all the other plays made by others, including the money catch by Cobb.

Credit for the comeback must be assigned to the QB.


UserPostedImage
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
+1
dfosterf
12 years ago
I don't give a shit. Somehow we won, and I know we needed to.

zombieslayer
12 years ago

I get it.. but I hate it. The deemed worthiness of the freaking stat.

Nevermind the defensive plays that lead up to the drive. Nevermind Finley making a huge play along the sidelines.. screw all the other plays made by others, including the money catch by Cobb.

Credit for the comeback must be assigned to the QB.


UserPostedImage

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



The reporters do that just to piss you off.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
dyeah_gb
12 years ago

I get it.. but I hate it. The deemed worthiness of the freaking stat.

Nevermind the defensive plays that lead up to the drive. Nevermind Finley making a huge play along the sidelines.. screw all the other plays made by others, including the money catch by Cobb.

Credit for the comeback must be assigned to the QB.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Can't disagree with your point. The only thing I can say is that it is understood that team is implied in these discussions.

I would give the play of the game to Bishop for forcing the fumble on Stafford.
The first principle is that you must not fool yourself, and you are the easiest person to fool - R. Feynman
Pack93z
12 years ago

Can't disagree with your point. The only thing I can say is that it is understood that team is implied in these discussions.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 



Nothing against how you put it.. or anyone implying it towards Rodgers. Just personally hate the concept.



I would give the play of the game to Bishop for forcing the fumble on Stafford.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 



And Moses too! [grin1]

Kid played well today.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

Can't disagree with your point. The only thing I can say is that it is understood that team is implied in these discussions.

I would give the play of the game to Bishop for forcing the fumble on Stafford.

Originally Posted by: dyeah_gb 



Bishop?
UserPostedImage
Rios39
12 years ago

Bishop?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I thought we were talking about the 2010 SB for a second. Now I realize Bishop was healthy enough to sneak on the field for one play.
blank
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (3h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
    Zero2Cool (4h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
    wpr (4h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
    wpr (4h) : now 3
    Zero2Cool (5h) : Who? What?
    beast (14h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
    Martha Careful (18h) : meh
    Zero2Cool (22h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
    Zero2Cool (22h) : It's so awesome.
    Zero2Cool (22h) : new site fan shout post fast
    wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
    dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
    wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
    beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
    wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
    dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
    dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
    Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
    Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Recent Topics
    11m / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

    16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.