[2012] Green Bay Packers vs Arizona Cardinals· Page 8

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#71

A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
[list]

Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.

176 rushing yards - woo hoo.

Mike Neal played solid.

31 points and a win.[/list]

Negatives
[list]

Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).

Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.

[/list]

Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?

Originally Posted by: olds70supreme

To be fair to 🇦🇷, once again, a lot of drops. The INT he threw was a pretty good pass to Cobb that Cobb either bobbled or had stripped from him (hard to tell from the angles). That pass was Cobb's fault, not Aaron's.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#72

A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
[list]

Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.

176 rushing yards - woo hoo.

Mike Neal played solid.

31 points and a win.[/list]

Negatives
[list]
Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).
Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.
[/list]

Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?

Originally Posted by: olds70supreme

I kind of felt that the colder weather was somewhat a part of the problem. I blame that on 🇲🇲. I have said it many times in the past that they practice too much inside. One day a week is enough. Get outside on the field turf and get use to the weather. Having the doors to the building open or sticking the footballs into the freezer is apparently not enough.

It almost seem to me that AZ stopped themselves with poor passing and WR drops as much the GB defense did in covering them.

GB won by 14 but I can easily see AZ getting 2 TDs if they executed better. And of course I know that GB did run the clock out at the end of the game.

olds70supreme
Member

12 years ago

#73

To be fair to , once again, a lot of drops. The INT he threw was a pretty good pass to Cobb that Cobb either bobbled or had stripped from him (hard to tell from the angles). That pass was Cobb's fault, not Aaron's.

True, maybe I should rephrase my comments as general positives and negatives for the team. Not necessarily assigning blame to Rodgers for the completion %, just bringing it up to show that something was a bit off in the passing game (be it Rodgers accuracy, receivers not making catches they should, or a combination of both).

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#74

If Aaron Rodgers tried walking on water and failed, the excuse would be it wasn't salt water so it doesn't count, lol.

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#75

I am going to this game on Sunday. Going to have a good time.

Originally Posted by: Packerchick

PC,
I saw you on the diamondvision at the game modeling your bikini top. I don't know if it made it to the tv screen as well. You got quite a loud cheer from the guys. :-"

You give the bikini girls a run for their money.

I tried to find a photo of it on the net this morning but couldn't locate it.

TheKanataThrilla
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#76

A couple of things stand out to me:
Positives
[list]

Rodgers only sacked one time, against a pretty good defense.

176 rushing yards - woo hoo.

Mike Neal played solid.

31 points and a win.[/list]

Negatives
[list]

Rodgers under 50% completion (yikes!).

Offense came out flat for awhile after halftime.

[/list]

Crosby is making me a little bit uneasy with his misses this year. Also, it's hard to be down on Cobb after the positive things he did but 3 catches on 9 targets?

Originally Posted by: olds70supreme

The point has been raised before, but a clear negative that I saw was that they were 0-3 on 3rd and 1. I really don't know why they struggle so badly in this scenario?

As an add-on Skelton was really good. The Card receivers really helped the Pack. Lots of dropped passes at key times.

gbguy20
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#77

Originally Posted by: TheKanataThrilla

Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#78

Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

Green converted 1 3rd and 1, and was stopped on 1. Thing is, on both of them, there were unblocked men in the hole. The one he was stopped, had 2 of them. Starks wasn't going to do any better in those plays.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

Pack93z
Select Member

12 years ago

#79

Green ran it twice on 3rd and 1, that accounts for 2 of them. On the other one we threw it.

GIVE ME STARKS

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

When Starks has impact, mostly because of his running style, is after he has a head of steam. Throw him in a third and short with a guy sitting in the hole with his upright style.. dude gets his marbles rocked.

I said in last week and the week before that.. Green is a better runner than Starks.. what Starks brings is the wood when he gets a crease. Green still is trying to dance instead of just exploding in the crease.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

Porforis
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#80

what Starks brings is the wood when he gets a crease. Green still is trying to dance instead of just exploding in the crease.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

Whoa, family website here.

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (4h) : Chiefs again huh? I guess another Super Bowl I'll be finding something else to do.

Mucky Tundra (14h) : Chiefs Eagles...again...sigh

dfosterf (15h) : Happy Birthday Dave!

Mucky Tundra (16h) : happy birthday dhazer

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Exactly buck...Washington came up with the ball. It is just a shitty coincidence one week later

buckeyepackfan (18h) : I forgot, they corrected the call a week later. Lol btw HAPPY BIRTHDAY dhazer!

buckeyepackfan (18h) : That brings up the question, why wasn't Nixon down by contact? I think that was the point Kanata was making.

buckeyepackfan (18h) : Turnovers rule, win the turnover battle, win the game.

packerfanoutwest (18h) : well, he was

TheKanataThrilla (18h) : Eagles down by contact on the fumble....fuck you NFL

Mucky Tundra (18h) : I think this games over

beast (19h) : Eagles sure get a lot of fumbles on kickoffs

Mucky Tundra (19h) : This game looks too big for Washington

packerfanoutwest (23h) : that being said, The Ravens are the Browns

packerfanoutwest (23h) : Browns, Dolphins have longest AFC Championship droughts

packerfanoutwest (23h) : As of today, Cowboys have longest NFC Championship drought,

beast (26-Jan) : Someone pointed out, with Raiders hiring Carroll, the division games between Carroll and Jim Harbaugh are back on (who can whine more games)

beast (26-Jan) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab

Zero2Cool (25-Jan) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me

Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not

Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!

beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋

Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.

dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.

beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no

Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.

beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?

beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you

wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.

wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.

wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.

Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down

Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor

dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious

beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere

beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.

beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?

Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22