rank 31st of 32 teams in stadium revenue, which makes ditching a home game less troublesome.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Vikings giving up a home game to play in London in 2013 
rank 31st of 32 teams in stadium revenue, which makes ditching a home game less troublesome.

Geez, if you're going to copy and paste something, at least link it.....you new here or what?

Originally Posted by: vikesrule 

Big rumour doing the rounds that the Vikings are going to play at Wembley next season in September.

No chance they will give up a home game V the Packers, Bears or Lions.

Looks like it could be the Steelers game.

Waits to see the steam coming from Formo and Vikes!!!!!

Originally Posted by: flep 

.. That said, I also heard that they (Vikings) are willing to play there the next 4 years. Which will be interesting.

Originally Posted by: Formo 

Final Conference Bill on Vikings 

Beginning at line 22.23

Doesn't look like that is on option for the Vikings. Personally I think that 4 years in a row with a new stadium coming online would be dumb idea.
And I for one would be way against that.

According to Minnesota House Bill HF 2958, the Vikings can only play 3 home games off of US soil in the next 15 years.


I'd say send the Packers next, but that would set Anglo/American relations back 200 years, and we need all the allies that we can get.
Cheeseheads in Britain?.......hillbillies in Trafalgar Square?.......dumbass's at Wembley is what you would have.[grin1]

Originally Posted by: vikesrule 

I thought that bill didn't go into effect until after the new stadium opened (or construction started on). But, I did see that they are willing to play one game a year in London until the new stadium opened.

Originally Posted by: Formo