Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
12 years ago

I'm not sure, but wasn't it The owners that locked out The officials? really doesn't matter, point I was trying to make, had nothing to do with why they were not there, just the fact that without them the games pretty much sucked.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Yes, but part of the reason the replacement officials sucked so much was that the NFL didn't get replacements from the top college officials. And why didn't they get those top college officials as replacements? Because the NFL officials control the upward movement of those college officials into the pro ranks and made it clear that "crossing the line" would torpedo any official's future.

The Packers got screwed. But it was a gang rape made up of the owners AND the guys everyone (else) is cheering.

For a couple weeks things will be great. By the end of the year, though, I predict that the regular officials will be no better -- and probably worse -- than they were before the lockout.

They're going to feel their power now. And when you concentrate power, the long term effect is, inevitably, a reduction in quality and the triumph of mediocrity.

The "Return" will be another illustration of "be careful what you wish for" before all is said and done. Unfortunately.




And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
Oh, and the main reason the Packer games sucked wasn't the officials. The main reason the games sucked is that the Packers played far too much mediocre football.

IMO
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
buckeyepackfan
12 years ago
Well hell, you all have convinced me, this is all one big conspiracy,

Gonns go watch Baseball, then college FB.

The hell with The NFL.

Thanks for helping me see the light.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
dhazer
12 years ago
This also means the return of the favortism for guys like Brady,Manning and other big name players that the replacement refs didn't care about.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
12 years ago

Given the alternative of replacement refs......I'll take the crew we get and give them a standing ovation when they take the field.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 




My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
12 years ago
Gee. Pointing out naiveté makes me a conspiracy theorist?


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
rabidgopher04
12 years ago

Yes, but part of the reason the replacement officials sucked so much was that the NFL didn't get replacements from the top college officials. And why didn't they get those top college officials as replacements? Because the NFL officials control the upward movement of those college officials into the pro ranks and made it clear that "crossing the line" would torpedo any official's future.

Originally Posted by: Wade 



Not just the upward movement, but also their existing jobs. As I understand it the NFL refs supervise the Division 1 refs and they were told that if they serve as replacements in the NFL they won't be allowed to come back to their D1 jobs.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
schroeder84
12 years ago
Nope, I am happy to have the real crews back. They are not perfect. They make mistakes. They are inconsistent. They are, however, not totally incompetent, which is what we have been treated to this season with the replacements.

At least we know what to expect.
Akexpat
12 years ago

I was hoping for Ed "The Guns" Hochuli.

Originally Posted by: rabidgopher04 



I was also hoping the same, however after the debacle that was the last game I would be ok with anyone with basic reasoning skills.


You will find Packers fans all across the world
Zero2Cool
12 years ago

I was also hoping the same, however after the debacle that was the last game I would be ok with anyone with basic reasoning skills.

Originally Posted by: Akexpat 



I'm down for consistency.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (38m) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (38m) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (1h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (1h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (1h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (1h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (1h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (1h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (1h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (1h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (1h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (1h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (1h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (1h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (2h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (2h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (2h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (2h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (2h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (2h) : Packers will get in
beast (2h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (2h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (2h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (4h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (5h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (5h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (6h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (15h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (15h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (16h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (19h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (19h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
18m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

44m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

57m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.