Jarrett Bush: Packers beat themselves against 49ers· Page 3

mkapp
Registered

12 years ago

I have been not impressed with the number of penalties we commit for awhile now. Bush is a big part of many penalty inducing moments.

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#22

Bush is our #5 CB.

Woody, Tramon, House, Shields, Hayward, Bush.

Bush belongs IN THE SLOT. Behind Woody and Hayward.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Are you sure?

I have Woody as SS, Tramon as #1 and Bush as #2.

Are you looking at an old depth chart? Mine is from yesterday.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

nerdmann
Premier Member

12 years ago

#23

Are you sure?

I have Woody as SS, Tramon as #1 and Bush as #2.

Are you looking at an old depth chart? Mine is from yesterday.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

Maybe you can switch Woody and Tramon.

Either way, Bush does not belong on the outside, imo.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

stevegb
Member

12 years ago

#24

SHUT UP AND MAKE A PLAY!

If you "beat yourself" all the time, then maybe YOU shouldn't be on the field!!!

Originally Posted by: Cheesey

There is no doubt in my mind that Jarrett Bush shouldn't be on the field, I cringe every time I see him on the roster. 😞

blank

Zero2Cool
Elite Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#25

I kind of gave him too much space. Gore's a good back. In the open field, he has made a lot of guys miss. So, you know, I just have to close the gap and do what I can to get him the ground.

M.D. Jennings wrote:

Kind of? No, not kind of. YOU DIDN'T EVEN MAKE CONTACT WITH THE RUNNER!!!

It's tough. It's a challenge, anytime you're rolling players in and out. That's where we are defensively as far as playing individuals based on personnel groupings. We do have a number of our guys that are, frankly, our role players. They need to focus on their role and perform at a higher level in that role.

Mike McCarthy wrote:

Then quit rolling players in and out and give the player a chance to improve. COACH'EM UP! If they can't be coached up, CUT THEIR ASS and find players that CAN be coached up!

zombieslayer
Registered

12 years ago

#26

Maybe you can switch Woody and Tramon.

Either way, Bush does not belong on the outside, imo.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann

Nerd - I completely agree with you. I'm not arguing that point.

The point I was trying to make was we're SO bad at CB that we have no choice but to put Bush in the #2 CB position. He really belongs lined up against the slot receiver or covering a speedy TE. We simply don't have the personnel to do that though.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Wade
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#27

I, too, hate the "beat ourselves" line.

You lost. You played like shit. You sucked. You played like a Vikings team. Yes, that's all true.

But SF played like a championship contender. They executed and dominated you, you pitiful non-tackling, non-covering Darrell Sharper imitator.

They whupped you.

You didn't deserve to win.

Everyone in the NFL has pro-level abilities. Even Tim Tebow. SF is good.

If the Packers are playing at their (Packers') best, the Packers are better than SF. If the Packers only playing at 80 % of their best, I'm not so sure.

And, based on that one game, I'm concerned about whether the Packers are ready/able to play at even 80% of their potential best.

But I'm still giving them a mulligan.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22