I think we need to be more accurate with our generalizations here. I believe most are saying that if Greg Jennings is demanding something in the range of $10 million per year or more, than the Packers have to let him walk because it's just not feasible to pay that to a WR when the Packers have other contracts that need to be extended too. Jennings is a class act, good WR and an asset to the team. But what most are saying is if it comes down to Greg Jennings OR both Clay Matthews and B.J. Raji, the Packers should let Jennings walk and keep both Matthews and Raji.
The Facebook comment was, in my opinion, over board.
Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool