Zero2Cool
13 years ago

So far, according to Florida law, he can walk (not enough evidence saying that he was the aggressor, thus he 'defended' himself).

If he never got out of his SUV, this would have never happened. So you'd think there HAS to be some accountability held there, right?

Originally Posted by: Formo 



So he was following this kid in his vehicle and shot the kid in self defense? I don't know about you guys, but if someone is following me in a car while I'm walking, I am going to be on the defensive. And if this person gets out, I will be even more defensive for my own personal safety.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago

Oh, both Al and Jesse were the reason this became such a hot 'read'. The killing happened about a month ago. They found out about the 'injustice' of the white killer walking scott free and they blew it to massive proportions.

Sadly enough, we wouldn't be having this discussion if either one of them didn't cry wolf.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



But does that make it wrong that we are having this discussion? Does any kid.. any victim of such a crime not have the right to be heard?

Would it be different if say Rush spoke out and brought a killing of a white kid by a black neighborhood watchman to light, bringing nation attention to it?

Yes.. those political activists, like they all do, are using this case to get their name in the media, and yes that is a shame to "use" it for personal gain, however it has opened a case that the police were quick to dismiss.

But IMO, it does not minimize the merits of this case being brought to court against Zimmerman.. especially with some of the inconsistent aspects brought to light.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Formo
13 years ago

So he was following this kid in his vehicle and shot the kid in self defense? I don't know about you guys, but if someone is following me in a car while I'm walking, I am going to be on the defensive. And if this person gets out, I will be even more defensive for my own personal safety.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Of course. But Zimmerman wasn't following the kid to 'shoot' him. He was following a suspicious person. At one point, he lost him. Now, I believe it's still unclear whether or not Zimmerman was on the phone with 911 AFTER he got out of his car or before..

What's completely unclear is how the altercation started. It could range from Zman approaching the kid and asking what he is doing and then getting a fist in the nose as an answer to Zman actually trying to detain the kid before the police arrive.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Formo
13 years ago

But does that make it wrong that we are having this discussion? Does any kid.. any victim of such a crime not have the right to be heard?

Would it be different if say Rush spoke out and brought a killing of a white kid by a black neighborhood watchman to light, bringing nation attention to it?

Yes.. those political activists, like they all do, are using this case to get their name in the media, and yes that is a shame to "use" it for personal gain, however it has opened a case that the police were quick to dismiss.

But IMO, it does not minimize the merits of this case being brought to court against Zimmerman.. especially with some of the inconsistent aspects brought to light.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



It was my understanding that the reason the local police weren't doing anything because the DA was working with Feds. But maybe I misunderstood.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Of course. But Zimmerman wasn't following the kid to 'shoot' him. He was following a suspicious person. At one point, he lost him. Now, I believe it's still unclear whether or not Zimmerman was on the phone with 911 AFTER he got out of his car or before..

What's completely unclear is how the altercation started. It could range from Zman approaching the kid and asking what he is doing and then getting a fist in the nose as an answer to Zman actually trying to detain the kid before the police arrive.

Originally Posted by: Formo 



How does the kid know if the grown man is following him to shoot him, to kidnap him, to rape him, to just say hi, or what not? The kid doesn't know, thus, you get defensive.

The more I read, the more I fault the adult. It sounds more and more like the adult (figuratively) backed the kid into a corner.

How does an adult shoot a kid in self defense after the adult has followed the kid and leaves his vehicle to approach/question the kid? Didn't the 911 operator also mention to the adult following him was NOT necessary?

After the adult shot the kid, did the adult immediately call 911?

UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago

It was my understanding that the reason the local police weren't doing anything because the DA was working with Feds. But maybe I misunderstood.

Originally Posted by: Formo 




Here is a timeline from ABC.. this is how I understand it in reading a couple of different reports upon it.. FBI didn't get involved until being pushed by the family attorney. there is more on the leap.



http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2012/03/trayvon-martin-case-timeline-of-events/ 

Below is a timeline of events:

Feb. 26: Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old Florida high school student, is found shot and killed, in Sanford, Fla., a community north of Orlando.

Several eyewitnesses report to police that they heard a scuffle, then a cry for help, and then a gunshot.

According to the Sanford police report, George Zimmerman, 28, a self-appointed neighborhood watch captain, is found armed with a handgun, standing over Martin. He has a bloody nose and a wound in the back of his head.

Martin is unresponsive and pronounced dead at the scene. He has no weapons on him, only a pack of Skittles and a bottle of iced tea.

Zimmerman tells police he killed Martin in self defense. Taking him at his word, police do not arrest him, nor administer a drug or alcohol test. They also did not run a background check.

March 9: Trayvon Martin’s family demands that police release the 911 tapes or make an arrest nearly one month after Martin was killed. Police declined to comment at the time, but told ABC News the tapes would be released the following week.

March 12: ABC News uncovers questionable police conduct in the investigation of the fatal shooting of Martin, including the alleged “correction” of at least one eyewitness’ account.

Sanford Police Chief Billy Lee said there is no evidence to dispute Zimmerman’s assertion that he shot Martin out of self-defense.

March 16: Police recordings made the night Zimmerman allegedly shot and killed Martin sent the boy’s mother screaming from the room and prompted his father to declare, “He killed my son,” a family representative tells ABC News.

ABC News affiliate WFTV publishes excerpts from the 911 calls.

One of several petitions for Zimmerman’s arrest has garnered more than 250,000 signatures on a change.org site, and at one point signatures were pouring in at the rate of 10,000 an hour, according to the website.

March 18: Martin’s family asks Attorney General Eric Holder and the FBI to get involved in the investigation of their son’s death.




"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Formo
13 years ago
I'm not really arguing your points. But here are some other bits:

How does the kid know if the grown man is following him to shoot him, to kidnap him, to rape him, to just say hi, or what not? The kid doesn't know, thus, you get defensive.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Exactly what I said.. He doesn't know the purpose of being followed and like I said, we don't know how the altercation started outside of Zimmerman's point of view.

The more I read, the more I fault the adult. It sounds more and more like the adult (figuratively) backed the kid into a corner.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



So you are saying that in most circumstances it's ok for one to jack someone in the nose (bloody/broken nose), put him on his ass and then bounce his head off the ground (lacerations/bleeding from the back of Zimmerman's head)? Again, we dont' know what started that altercation, so Martin may very well be in the right to do such things.. But at the same time, Zimmerman also has a right to protect himself, does he not?

How does an adult shoot a kid in self defense after the adult has followed the kid and leaves his vehicle to approach/question the kid? Didn't the 911 operator also mention to the adult following him was NOT necessary?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Yes, the operator told Zimmerman that following the kid wasn't necessary. And Zimmerman actually responded with, "OK".

After the adult shot the kid, did the adult immediately call 911?

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



That is a REALLY good question.
UserPostedImage
Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
4PackGirl
13 years ago
ok, let me simplify this entire issue with one simple question...

if zimmermann had listened to law enforcement he was speaking to on his phone who told him they were on their way & that he didn't need to continue following the kid, would the kid be dead?

pretty damn simple, right?

i don't wanna hear squat about this kids past or even the zimmermann dude's past, who's black, who's white, who's hispanic, & i sure as hell don't care what jesse jackson or al sharpton think either.

any person walking down the street doing nothing to you or your personal property does not deserve to be shot - PERIOD!!
it amazes me that some of you actually think this is all good, cool, & fine. WTF?!? i don't give two shits what the damn florida law says either - if nothing else, this guy was absolutely stalking & harassing this kid. convict his ass on that bare minimum.

4PackGirl
13 years ago
and another thing....
zimmermann wouldn't have HAD to defend himself if he had simply GONE THE FUCK HOME!!!!!!

Zero2Cool
13 years ago

So you are saying that in most circumstances it's ok for one to jack someone in the nose (bloody/broken nose), put him on his ass and then bounce his head off the ground (lacerations/bleeding from the back of Zimmerman's head)? Again, we dont' know what started that altercation, so Martin may very well be in the right to do such things.. But at the same time, Zimmerman also has a right to protect himself, does he not?

Originally Posted by: Formo 



I think this comment is skipping the chain of events. If they are both walking along and the kid pops the adult in the nose, yes, I agree with the right to self defense on the part of the adult.

The kid is walking. The adult is following him in his vehicle. At this point, I ask myself, why does one follow someone and why? When are those intentions ever for the good? If I'm that kid (and I've been in a similar situation, once on foot, once in my car) I am in fear of my own personal safety.

We do know that if the adult never leaves his vehicle, there is no altercation, would you agree? The adult had essentially two weapons, his car and gun. The kid has what to defend himself? Skittles? Ice Tea? True, the adult has NO CLUE what the kid has ... which makes me ask the next question ... why get out of your vehicle at all when you've already contacted the authorities?

I'm simply not buying the adult claiming self defense when HE initiated the contact by following the kid and also getting out of his vehicle.


Edit, just started reading this on CNN.

Mary Cutcher and her roommate, Selma Mora Lamilla, told CNN Monday that they ran outside. "Within seconds," they were about 10 feet away from Martin's body, Lamilla said.

"(Zimmerman) was standing over the body, basically straddling the body with his hand on Trayvon's back," said Cutcher, adding that they called three times to him before he finally asked them to call police. "It didn't seem to me that he was trying to help him in any way."

CNN.com  wrote:




Edit2.

UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (18-Aug) : We do have good depth at running back imo. Still so frustrating. Bitching about it is a futile excercise, which I plan to do anyway.
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Whoops, I thought Zero was saying it was a surprise the Brewers lost and not Lloyd being hurt
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : Not a surprise; inevitable
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : Brewers streak ends at 14
Zero2Cool (17-Aug) : SURPRISE
Mucky Tundra (17-Aug) : @mattschneidman Matt LaFleur on MarShawn Lloyd: “He’s gonna miss some time.”
Mucky Tundra (16-Aug) : CLIFFORD WITH THE TD WITH UNDER 2 TO GO!!!!!
Zero2Cool (16-Aug) : 90 MINUTES UNTIL FAKE KICKOFF!!
Martha Careful (16-Aug) : I think Ruven is a bot, but regardless should be stricken from the site.
Zero2Cool (14-Aug) : Packers RB Josh Jacobs ranked No. 33 in NFL 'Top 100'
dfosterf (13-Aug) : The LVN Musgrave collision- Andy Herman said Musgrave seemed to be the one most impacted injury-wise
dfosterf (13-Aug) : a lower back injury
dfosterf (13-Aug) : Doubs says he's "fine" after injury scare. Some reported it as z
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : With LVN that is; need to see what happens in the next practice
Mucky Tundra (13-Aug) : beast, reading about what happened, it sounded like one of those "two guys collide and are moving slow afterwards" type of deals
beast (12-Aug) : I believe Musgrave has been injured every single season since at least a Sophomore in highschool
packerfanoutwest (12-Aug) : Matt LaFleur: “Highly unlikely” Jordan Love plays more this preseason
dfosterf (12-Aug) : Doubs, Savion Williams, LVN, Musgrave all banged up to one degree or another, missing one here I forget
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : RB Tyrion Davis-Price is signing with the Green Bay Packers.
Zero2Cool (12-Aug) : zero help, dominated. preseason
beast (12-Aug) : QB Jordan Love has surgery
beast (12-Aug) : Martha said Morgan had a lot of help, I didn't watch the OL so I can't say.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers LT Jordan Morgan did not allow a single pressure across 23 pass-blocking snaps vs. Jets last night, per PFF
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : With buckeye and the reasonable couple, we're currently sitting at 10
buckeyepackfan (10-Aug) : Just posted to re-up on our FFL.
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : If healthy after, then thats all I care. Well, no drops would be nice
wpr (10-Aug) : I made it through the 1st Q.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Just gotta figure out how.
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Could have been a worse start, so there is that.
beast (10-Aug) : Yeah, someone tell the Packers football season has started, seems like they weren't ready for it
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : Sooooooo many penalties
Mucky Tundra (10-Aug) : It may only be preseason, but this game is a trip to the dentist
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do bad -- FREAK OUT!!!!!!
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Packers do good -- eh only preseason
dfosterf (10-Aug) : Well that half was fun
Zero2Cool (10-Aug) : Great, zayne is down
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : 13 minutes away from kickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkoffff
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Had Celebration of Life for my uncle up north. wicked rain hope it dont come south
Mucky Tundra (9-Aug) : THE GREEN BAY PACKERS ARE PLAYING FOOTBALL TONIGHT!!!!!! THIS IS NOT A DRILL!!!!
Zero2Cool (9-Aug) : Woo-hoo
TheKanataThrilla (9-Aug) : NFL Network is broadcasting the game tonight, but not in Canada. Not sure why as no local television is showing the game.
beast (8-Aug) : But the Return from IR designations had to be applied by the 53 man cutdown.
beast (8-Aug) : It's a new rule, so it's not clear, but my understanding was that they could be IR'd at any time
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : *had to be IRed at 53
Mucky Tundra (8-Aug) : beast, I thought the designate return from IR players had to be IR at cutdowns to 53, not before
beast (8-Aug) : It's a brand new rule, either last season or this season, prior, all pre-season IRs were done for the season
beast (8-Aug) : But the Packers would have to use one for their return from IR spots on him, when they cut down to 53.
beast (8-Aug) : I think the NFL recently changed the IR rules, so maybe the season might not be over for OL Glover.
Zero2Cool (8-Aug) : Packers star Howton, first NFLPA prez, dies at 95 😔
dfosterf (8-Aug) : Apparently it is too complicated for several to follow your simple instructions, but I digress
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / isaiah

17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Aug / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

21-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

19-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Aug / Around The NFL / isaiah

18-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Aug / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / beast

15-Aug / Around The NFL / Mucky Tundra

13-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.