RashaanSalaami
13 years ago
Week 12 Metrics 

This is what you call a near exclusive nickel game for this defense. They didn't call one traditional run play against our base 3-4 front which we may have used on maybe a grand total of 5 snaps all game, if that. So if you think they had success running the ball (they did average nearly 6 yards a pop with running backs), that's why. The stats show they also only picked up 7 rushing first downs all game and at least one was on a Stafford scramble.

Loved the bracket coverage look we gave Calvin Johnson virtually all through the first half and even through the second. We kept him quiet and forced Stafford to beat us in other ways. I think the Lions could have had more success against this defense had Stafford made a couple fairly routine passes and a better read on the Francois pick, but that's the quarterback Stafford is right now...not great. It's the reason we can afford to play so much bracket coverage on Megatron. To his credit, Williams stepped up his game and put on a fantastic performance. The man did drop 2 easy picks though. I'm sure the guys were ribbing on him in the locker room about those. So while Stafford could have played better, our D could have had 2 more turnovers too, so take it how you want.

Woodson's in the zone right now. He's making excellent reads and taking calculated gambles. I think we're also benefiting from using him more in the role he's accustomed to playing at this point in his career...around the football and the LOS. His instincts and ball skills are still at the top of pack. He's having a legitimate Pro Bowl season again.

Loved that Shields' name was rarely called. He tends to have some of those games in him. Would love to see that man put it together consistently.

Thought Smith played very well for his first game action. Clearly looks like someone who has seen the field in his day. Looked like another Desmond Bishop out there quite honestly. Effective getting to the passer too! Would like to see more out of him. Francois looked athletic and not just on the pick play. While I want Bishop and Hawk back, I suppose I could wait and give these two another shot. I think our defense could cope without the two of them better than injuries to other positions.

Finally, Capers is really itching to use Matthews in coverage more. There's no reason he won't be an elite cover linebacker in this league (he basically is in the capacities he's used--not enough downfield video on him), but unfortunately he's also our best pass rusher, which is a slightly more valuable asset I'd say. Hope we can get another pure pass rusher and let this man patrol the underneath routes a little bit. Get him some more experience and he's going to come up with big plays in zone coverage...guaranteed.
blank
RashaanSalaami
13 years ago
@zombieslayer from last thread. The numbers on the far right are season totals. I should have the full season totals again next week as it is the end of the 3rd quarter.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
So if I am reading your chart correctly, opposing quarterbacks have a cumulative passer rating of 14.58 with an average of 3.25 YPA against Clay Matthews? That is mind-blowing! The only man on this defense who appears to be consistently getting lit up is Desmond Bishop, against whom opposing quarterbacks are throwing for a hefty 8.89 ypa (roughly Tom Brady's average on the season) for a passer rating of 122.4. He seems to be the one weak link on this defense.

Still, in aggregate, our starting defensive corps is holding opposing quarterbacks to a passer rating of 77.91, while our quarterback's passer rating is over 120. That is not only phenomenal, it is approaching historic.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
13 years ago

@zombieslayer from last thread. The numbers on the far right are season totals. I should have the full season totals again next week as it is the end of the 3rd quarter.

Originally Posted by: RashaanSalaami 



OK, cool. So yes, Woodson is looking like he's having another Pro Bowl season. I still want him to break the pick 6 record. He's 1 away from tying, and that's one thing I want for 2011 (in order of importance - the 3 things I want is the SB win after the season, 🇦🇷 to break P Manning's single season QB rating record, and Woodson to tie the pick 6 record this year).

Yeah, it is a shame CM3 is so good in coverage. I agree that pass rushing is more important.

Bishop is probably getting beaten by TEs and underneath shots to RBs and to be fair, opposing QBs have to take what they can get. What do you do if you're a starting QB and you got T Williams and Woodson alternating on your main receivers and Shields covering your 3rd receiver? You often have to dump it off. So is Bishop "bad" in coverage or is it because QBs are taking what they can get? That's a question I have for you Rashaan.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
RashaanSalaami
13 years ago

So if I am reading your chart correctly, opposing quarterbacks have a cumulative passer rating of 14.58 with an average of 3.25 YPA against Clay Matthews? That is mind-blowing! The only man on this defense who appears to be consistently getting lit up is Desmond Bishop, against whom opposing quarterbacks are throwing for a hefty 8.89 ypa (roughly Tom Brady's average on the season) for a passer rating of 122.4. He seems to be the one weak link on this defense.

Still, in aggregate, our starting defensive corps is holding opposing quarterbacks to a passer rating of 77.91, while our quarterback's passer rating is over 120. That is not only phenomenal, it is approaching historic.

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Matthews, yeah, he good. He hasn't played too much man, but in the rare instances he has been counted on to do that, he's done just fine, like against Sproles Week 1.

Bishop isn't a particularly strong link in coverage. I think he's fairly overrated on this defense, but Hawk hasn't been much of a strength either. He's usually masked in coverage by Capers, which goes to show what they think of him in comparison to Bishop. Bishop is a decent guy in short zone, but I don't like the idea of having him run with his back to the line of scrimmage. Even though he's made a couple decent plays, he has been beat fairly badly.

Our passer rating differential IS ABSURD. Our defense would also look a lot better if we didn't play so lax in the 4th quarter, but I'm not complaining because it's worked well so far considering we're undefeated.
blank
RashaanSalaami
13 years ago

OK, cool. So yes, Woodson is looking like he's having another Pro Bowl season. I still want him to break the pick 6 record. He's 1 away from tying, and that's one thing I want for 2011 (in order of importance - the 3 things I want is the SB win after the season, 🇦🇷 to break P Manning's single season QB rating record, and Woodson to tie the pick 6 record this year).

Yeah, it is a shame CM3 is so good in coverage. I agree that pass rushing is more important.

Bishop is probably getting beaten by TEs and underneath shots to RBs and to be fair, opposing QBs have to take what they can get. What do you do if you're a starting QB and you got T Williams and Woodson alternating on your main receivers and Shields covering your 3rd receiver? You often have to dump it off. So is Bishop "bad" in coverage or is it because QBs are taking what they can get? That's a question I have for you Rashaan.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



Honestly, I think it's a little bit of both. Towards the end of games, the defenses are "lighting" up the defense underneath which is where Bishop roams. When you get the underneath crossing routes at the end of games, backers get tired and the defense already plays more loose as is. I try to not hold backers individually responsible in these instances in obvious situations.

However, I think we have also used Bishop in man coverage a good bit more than I would like to see. He isn't particularly fluid and will struggle against tight ends down the field. When you consider the mold of tight ends in this league though, I think fewer and fewer inside backers are gonna be capable of running stride for stride with them. Of course, on the flipside, QBs are probably avoiding our perimeters because of whose out there.

In short, you ask a great question, that I don't think has a definite answer.
blank
zombieslayer
13 years ago
Yeah, I agree.

It isn't an excuse. It just is what it is. TEs generally beat LBs in today's NFL. That's why when we have to, we'll occasionally see Woodson take out the TE. Or am I seeing things? I think I remember Woodson sliding over to cover TEs a lot.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
RashaanSalaami
13 years ago

Yeah, I agree.

It isn't an excuse. It just is what it is. TEs generally beat LBs in today's NFL. That's why when we have to, we'll occasionally see Woodson take out the TE. Or am I seeing things? I think I remember Woodson sliding over to cover TEs a lot.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 



No, your vision seems to be 20/20 there. Think we've seen less of it this year, but some of that is probably due to the early season injury of Tramon. That and I think we've also played more zone this year, particularly when up multiple scores as we have been quite often.
blank
Fan Shout
beast (8h) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (8h) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (18h) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (18h) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (20h) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (21h) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22h) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22h) : Thank you
wpr (22h) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22h) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22h) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22h) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22h) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (23h) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (23h) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (23h) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (23h) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (23h) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : Ohio State just got punched in the gut. Lets see how they respond
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame vs the Luckeyes, bleh
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Oh snap!!!
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Even Stevie Wonder can see that.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : Nah, you see Lions OC leaving to be HC of Bears is directly related to Packers.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ohhhhhhh Zero is in TROUBLE
packerfanoutwest (21-Jan) : Zero, per your orders, check Bearshome, not packershome
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Then he'll land with another team and flourish.
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : Ben going to Bears. He'll be out in 3 years.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jan) : what's so funny?
Zero2Cool (20-Jan) : BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
17h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

23h / Random Babble / packerfanoutwest

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.