macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
Cobb's TD return was on ESPN's Sports Science this week. Don't know how much of it is actually science, but I enjoyed the video. I think the way his left leg was coming around he was likely to remain on his feet even if Kuhn hadn't been there to 'assist'.



Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
This guy doesn't know what he is talking about. Kuhn provided virtually no assistance to Cobb. Cobb would have made the TD return without Kuhn's help. [happy]
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

This guy doesn't know what he is talking about. Kuhn provided virtually no assistance to Cobb. Cobb would have made the TD return without Kuhn's help. [happy]

Originally Posted by: Nonstopdrivel 



Exactly, any moron can see by simply watching the video that John Kuhn provided little assistance. A simple understanding of physics is barely necessary, however a dose of common sense is required.[happy]



Edit, not sure why I said 'moron' there, uncalled for and was not directed towards anyone. Maybe I hit the "moron" key instead of the "one" key??
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
13 years ago

Exactly, any moron can see by simply watching the video that John Kuhn provided little assistance. A simple understanding of physics is barely necessary, however a dose of common sense is required.[happy]

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



What's funny is before watching this video I actually believed Kuhn helped him quite a bit. However looking at now, it seems very obvious Cobb would've remained upright even if Kuhn hadn't helped him.
This is a placeholder
Pack93z
13 years ago

What's funny is before watching this video I actually believed Kuhn helped him quite a bit. However looking at now, it seems very obvious Cobb would've remained upright even if Kuhn hadn't helped him.

Originally Posted by: Packers_Finland 



He might have stayed on his feet, but would have the timing throughout the rest of the play remained the same? A split second of change may have altered what in the overall return?

I need to go find that lollipop loving owl , the one of all being knowledge to answer those questions with any certainty.

So.. Kuhn's part in the play may or may not have altered the outcome.. so can one really say with conviction the Kuhn didn't assist Cobb?
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

So.. Kuhn's part in the play may or may not have altered the outcome.. so can one really say with conviction the Kuhn didn't assist Cobb?

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



One can not say John Kuhn didn't assist Randall Cobb with conviction. I know I've said a few a times that the assist was minimal at most, never denying there wasn't. Randall Cobb was already regaining vertical balance before John Kuhn touched him. I don't know this for a fact, but after watching the play more than a dozen times in slow motion, I'm confident Randall Cobb would have scored regardless of John Kuhn being present.

It was a fantastic play and I had hoped we'd be watching it over and over because of it's awesomeness, not to argue about John Kuhn's assistance, or lack there of.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago



It was a fantastic play and I had hoped we'd be watching it over and over because of it's awesomeness, not to argue about John Kuhn's assistance, or lack there of.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Who is arguing.. just playing devils advocate is all. More of the running joke more so that the "assistance" angle has generated.

That said.. the topic at hand is if there was assistance.. therefore altered and the follow up question of its overall impact is subjective and unanswerable. You know.. following the topic of the OP and some followup comments. I guess I shouldn't have commented at all..

Who said it isn't an excellent play and who is not enjoying it?



"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Who is arguing.. just playing devils advocate is all. More of the running joke more so that the "assistance" angle has generated.

That said.. the topic at hand is if there was assistance.. therefore altered and the follow up question of its overall impact is subjective and unanswerable. You know.. following the topic of the OP and some followup comments. I guess I shouldn't have commented at all..

Who said it isn't an excellent play and who is not enjoying it?

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Who said someone said it wasn't a fantastic play? Who said someone wasn't enjoying it? 🤔

You are right, no one is arguing, a little hyperbole on my part. It's actually a decent debate, and after all, this is a forum and that's what we do. My mistake there. And you are also right, the topic is a bout John Kuhn's assistance. My mistake was I only viewed the video, didn't read the text. 😣 <-- on my own error.


UserPostedImage
beast
13 years ago

Cobb's TD return was on ESPN's Sports Science this week. Don't know how much of it is actually science, but I enjoyed the video. I think the way his left leg was coming around he was likely to remain on his feet even if Kuhn hadn't been there to 'assist'.

Originally Posted by: macbob 



I hate sport science... because it's not science (and I think real science would disagree with them with a lot of the assumption they make)... and it's only very little sport... it's watch video and let us say words like it means something and true... when it's not...

The video says the hit shifted Cobb's center of gravity outside his base of support, his legs. I think we can all see he wasn't outside of his legs but inside and there for could of caught himself.

The video also says three arms supported Cobb... do they not see that his foot was also on the ground?


As for Kuhn... I think the guy he was blocking got off of his block and hit Cobb... and the reason for the spin/roll in the first place. So he's mistake slowed Cobb up in the first place and looked like Cobb was gonna catch himself.

But Kuhn did then help the play... by get his feet tangled up with a Saint, who was catching up to Cobb while Cobb was trying to speed back up... Kuhn and the Saints' player got tripped up by each other... the Saints player was #35... who the Saints list as one FB Korey Hall. Both FBs... I wonder if they knew each other :-"
UserPostedImage
macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
Kuhn did not help Cobb. It's clear from the video he was simply congratulating Cobb on the TD, without waiting for him to have first crossed the goal line... [grin1]
Fan Shout
beast (4h) : I'm confused, Pete Carroll and Brian Schottenheimer? When Todd Monken, Joe Brady, Kellen Moore, Kliff Kingsbury and Zac Robinson are availab
Zero2Cool (7h) : Any reason I'm catching a shot here about my intelligence?
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : thank you Mucky for sticking up for me
Martha Careful (25-Jan) : some of those people are smarter than you zero. However Pete Carroll is not
Mucky Tundra (24-Jan) : Rude!
beast (24-Jan) : Martha? 😋
Zero2Cool (24-Jan) : Raiders hired someone from the elderly home.
dfosterf (24-Jan) : I'm going with a combination of the two.
beast (24-Jan) : Either the Cowboys have no idea what they're doing, or they're targeting their former OC, currently the Eagles OC
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Fake news. Cowboys say no
Zero2Cool (23-Jan) : Mystery candidate in the Cowboys head coaching search believed to be Packers ST Coordinator Rich Bisaccia.
beast (23-Jan) : Also why do both NYC teams have absolutely horrible OL for over a decade?
beast (23-Jan) : I wonder why the Jets always hire defensive coaches to be head coach
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Still HC positions available out there. I wonder if Hafley pops up for one
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Trent Baalke is out as the Jaguars GM.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Jeff Hafley would have been a better choice, fortunately they don't know that. Someone will figure that out next off season
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Aaron Glenn Planning To Take Jets HC Job
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Martha- C'est mon boulot! 😁
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you
wpr (22-Jan) : Z, glad you are feeling better.
wpr (22-Jan) : My son and D-I-L work for UM. It's a way to pick on them.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : Thank you. I rarely get sick, and even more rarely sick to the point I can't work.
wpr (22-Jan) : Beast- back to yesterday, I CAN say OSU your have been Michigan IF the odds of making the playoffs were more urgent.
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Glad to hear you are feeling a bit better.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : I've been near death ill last several days, finally feel less dead and site issues.
Zero2Cool (22-Jan) : It is a big deal. This host is having issues. It's frustrating.
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : just kidding...it was down
Martha Careful (22-Jan) : you were blocked yesterday, due to a a recalcitrant demeanor yesterday in the penalty box for a recalcitrant demeanor
dfosterf (22-Jan) : Was that site shutdown on your end or mine? No big deal, just curious
beast (21-Jan) : That way teams like Indiana and SMU don't make the conference championships by simply avoiding all the other good teams in their own confere
beast (21-Jan) : Also, with these "Super Conferences" instead of a single conference champion, have 4 teams make a Conference playoffs.
beast (21-Jan) : Also in college football, is a bye week a good or bad thing?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : The tournament format was fine. Seeding could use some work.
beast (21-Jan) : You can't assume Ohio State would of won the Michigan game...
beast (21-Jan) : Rankings were 1) Oregon 2) Georgia 3) Texas 4) Penn State 5) Notre Dame 6) Ohio State, none of the rest mattered
wpr (21-Jan) : Texas, ND and OSU would have been fighting for the final 2 slots.
wpr (21-Jan) : Oregon and Georgia were locks. Without the luxury of extra playoff berths, Ohios St would have been more focused on Michigan game.
wpr (21-Jan) : Zero, no. If there were only 4 teams Ohio State would have been one of them. Boise St and ASU would not have been selected.
Zero2Cool (21-Jan) : So that was 7 vs 8, that means in BCS they never would made it?
Martha Careful (21-Jan) : A great game. Give ND credit for coming back, although I am please with the outcome.
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : FG to make it academic
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : and there's the dagger
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooo 8 point game with 4 minutes to go!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : ooooooooohhhhhh he missed!
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Ooooo that completion makes things VERY interesting
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Game not over yet
beast (21-Jan) : Oh yeah, Georgia starting quarterback season ending elbow injury
beast (21-Jan) : Sadly something happened to Georgia... they should be playing in this game against Ohio State
beast (21-Jan) : I thought Ohio State and Texas were both better than Notre Dame & Penn State
Mucky Tundra (21-Jan) : Notre Lame getting rolled
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

25-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

21-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

20-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Jan / Random Babble / Martha Careful

18-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

17-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.