What i Saw · PACKERSHOME

Mortfini
Registered Topic Starter

16 years ago

Latey ive been sitting back reading the forum and not posting much but i felt after this game i thought id give u my view of last night

1) rodgers. Rodgers looked off tonight, in some of his throws lots of under and over throwing WR

2) the OL and grant. the ol did a good job of opening holes for grant to run though but lacked on some pass protections Forcing rodgers to move on the other hand they did a good job keeping the false starts to only 1 (i think)

3) frost. FIRE HIM NOW and get any1 in (and i mean any1)

4)unable to cover t.e's. in the preseason we brought in chillar to cover t.e's as brady p was stronger on blitzing but his inability to cover both t.e's (shockey and graham) forced out Cb and safteys to keep a eye on them forcing openings for their Wr

5) sanders. i think Sanders (who was blitzing in the 1st 2 saints drives) was forced to back off and keep more in coverage for reason no. 4

other points

How was that not a 15 yard for the shot on greg j?
how annoying r the MNF crew talking about no.4 EVERY PLAY

the rest of the season (starting sunday)
We MUST win all of our remaining games, the panthers (8-3) have i think lost all the 3 games on the road
we need to pray for a bears win late sunday night then we can hopefuly beat the bears Later on to keeping us all at the same record (providing every1 continues to win)

i Still think we can win the NFC north then once ya in the post season who knows (the giants last year)

Thank you for your time..

Mortfini

Wanna join the discussion?! Login to your PACKERSHOME forum account or Register a new forum account

bozz_2006
Registered

16 years ago

Thanks Mort. I don't know if it even matters who wins the NFCN. I believe the winner is set up for a round one playoff exit. I'm not folding the season, but I would rather just focus on playing hard, executing, and developing timing and chemistry rather than the playoffs. If we make the playoffs that's great, but I don't expect to get far if we do. We all knew coming in to this season with Rodgers that it was basically a year to get acclimated. We all hoped for the best from him and I think he's playing well. I'm glad we have him, but there are bigger problems that this team needs to address before we can be a contender.

djcubez
Senior Member

16 years ago

"Mortfini" wrote:

I agree about Rodger's. His arm seemed a lot better and his passes had the zip that I remembered before he injured his shoulder, but his accuracy was terribly off, especially on that underthrow to a wide open Jennings down the field.

Rios39
Member

16 years ago

Rodgers was a bit off. Recievers ran a few bad routes and the D was...well the biggest reason we lost.

blank

shield4life
Veteran Member

16 years ago

I agree, anyways the best part of this season is Rodgers getting experience in every aspect of the game learning what he did wrong, what he needs to do right. His top 10 qb right now.

Glad To Be A Packers Fan.

GOPACKGO1225
Registered

16 years ago

I agree with everything you said. Especially the MNF announcers things. It seems like Kornheiser was using any opportunity he had to talk about Favre.

Ginco19
Member

16 years ago

"djcubez" wrote:

"Mortfini" wrote:

According to Jennings the first throw aaron underthrew him on was because Jennings abandoned his route to go upfield due to blown coverage. (Just extra information on that pass) IMO Rodgers coulda, shoulda recognized what Jennings saw and made the throw, but I at least understand how he missed him that bad on that throw. (either way its game experience and mistakes like that are things you learn with seeing them) And as for the first INT by Rodgers was a timing route that Jennings fell on, not much you can do there.
To me Rodgers looked a little uptight in the first few drives and I cant speak for the rest of the game because i was back and forth watchin the game.

http://i270.photobucket.com/albums/jj103/pack93z/Woodsonsig1.png

Pack93z
Select Member

16 years ago

What I saw... is that if you need to score more than 29 points to win the game.. you aren't going to win a lot of them.

Defense lost this one.. no pressure up front and blown coverages in the back.. plain and simple.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

bozz_2006
Registered

16 years ago

Kornheiser makes me long for the Dennis Miller days. yikes.

dfosterf
Veteran Member

16 years ago

#10

Rodgers was a bit off. Recievers ran a few bad routes and the D was...well the biggest reason we lost.

"Rios39" wrote:

Simple post. What's my word...ah, yes... pithy.

Dead balls on accurate. (Melissa was soooo... cute in that flick)

+1

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (2h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (11h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS