Zero2Cool
13 years ago


GREEN BAY, Wis. -- Last summer at this time, Aaron Rodgers was one of the NFL's promising young quarterbacks. Now the promise has been realized and Aaron Rodgers has gone from someone knocking at the door to someone locked in the penthouse suite.

So what happened? I'll tell you what: A Super Bowl. Aaron Rodgers became an elite quarterback because Aaron Rodgers won a Super Bowl.

Dismiss the importance of Super Bowl success all you want; you can't ignore the impact it had on Rodgers. It turned him from one of the game's likeable young talents into one of its most effective and most feared passers.

A year ago, Rodgers was a young talent with a limited résumé. He not only hadn't won a Super Bowl; he hadn't won a playoff game. Now that he has ... well, some people insist he'll be better than Brett Favre. Others suggest he's already there, refusing to allow him room to exhale. Still others believe it won't be long before he squeezes Tom Brady and Peyton Manning off the quarterback summit.

All I know is one game has made a difference for one guy.

"I don't really pay a whole lot of attention to that," Rodgers said Sunday. "When I hear the term 'elite quarterback,' I think of Peyton and Tom, first of all. I think [when people mention it] they're talking of a standard of play that sets the standard for the rest of the league."

Well, then, congratulations, Aaron Rodgers; you've arrived.

Rodgers set the standard for the rest of the league in last year's playoffs when the Packers ran the table, winning three straight before toppling Pittsburgh in Super Bowl XLV. In defeats of Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago and the Steelers, Rodgers was more than just a competent, young quarterback; he was an elite quarterback, with nine touchdown passes, two interceptions and a perfect 4-0 record.

By contrast, Brady and Manning were 0-2 and are a combined 0-4 in their last four playoff games.

But this isn't about Brady and Manning. Their reputations are established, and their places in Canton reserved. Nope, this is about Aaron Rodgers, and no victory last season was more important for him than the last -- the Packers' first Super Bowl triumph since Brett Favre was here in the 1990s.

Granted, it didn't change Rodgers. He says he's still the same guy --looks the same, dresses the same, acts the same and all that -- but it did change the way he is perceived ... and he's perceived as one of the NFL's best and brightest.

There's a lesson there, and the lesson is this: Never underestimate the importance of a Super Bowl victory for a quarterback.

"It seems to [be a big deal] from the media's perspective," he said. "For me to be satisfied at the end of my career -- I thought about it as a young man -- winning a Super Bowl was part of that equation. In order to feel I finally accomplished what I wanted to accomplish on the field, winning a Super Bowl was part of the equation."

What Rodgers accomplished is not unlike what Brady or Manning accomplished in their careers. Brady was the young quarterback who displaced Drew Bledsoe ... until he won a Super Bowl. When he won a second, he was the quarterback others somehow missed. And when he won a third in four seasons he bought himself a ticket to Canton.

Manning was the quarterback who couldn't win a big game ... until, of course, he did in the 2006 playoffs, dispatching Brady and the Patriots in the playoffs and the Chicago Bears in Super Bowl XLI. When he returned three years later, he was the quarterback who would be king -- with some analysts suggesting a victory might make him the best of all time.

What they forgot was that they were the same people who in 2006 charged that Manning needed a Super Bowl win to validate his career. I don't know about that. What I do know is that the Super Bowl changed the perception of Manning, just as it changes the perceptions of almost all top quarterbacks, with Rodgers the latest example.

Look, for instance, at how he and San Diego's Philip Rivers are portrayed: Young, talented, accurate and successful quarterbacks. Except one won a Super Bowl, and one has not.

Where the game solidified the reputation of Drew Brees in 2009, one year later it launched Aaron Rodgers into the stratosphere at his position, and hallelujah. Until then, Rodgers' pro career was littered with speed bumps, and the poor guy was due a break. With Super Bowl XLV, he caught it.

This is the prospect, remember, who could've been the top draft choice in 2005, only San Francisco passed on him in favor of Alex Smith -- leaving Rodgers to plummet to the 24th position before Green Bay came to the rescue. So he landed here, sat behind Favre for three seasons, then emerged to become what he is now -- an elite quarterback.

Of course, San Francisco passed on Brady, too, after working him out prior to the 2000 draft, and I can't imagine how Rodgers' career might have changed had he been the first pick in 2005. What I do know is how that career has changed now -- and not because of anything the 49ers did but because of what Aaron Rodgers and the Green Bay Packers just did.

"As a quarterback," said Rodgers, "you'd like to think you'd have the same type of success, had I been picked one [in the draft] or picked by the Dolphins or Tampa Bay or the Cardinals at eight. But it's hard to replicate that same feeling of disappointment as you continue to drop. That was matched by the same sense of wanting to prove yourself again ... and needing to. That was invaluable to me.

"Then you look at what's happened in the league. I'm not going to take all the credit for it, but teams are starting to realize it's not a horrible thing to have a guy sit for a couple of years and learn the position instead of being thrust into a situation where they're not surrounded by a team that's intact and having to do too much ... or be asked to do too much. It's a lot of pressure. So you're looking at quarterbacks now who in the first round might have an opportunity to sit for a couple of years, and that time for me was invaluable."

In Green Bay, you're looking at a quarterback now who should have an opportunity to win more, maybe several more, Super Bowls, and that's invaluable, too. No longer must Aaron Rodgers demonstrate he's one of the game's best quarterbacks; he just proved it.

"From a credibility standpoint," said coach Mike McCarthy, "[winning a Super Bowl] definitely takes you to another level, and that is so big in our business. I’m talking in the locker room and in the building because that’s where it matters the most.

"But if you look at the guys who achieved true greatness the key is to stay at that level. I tell him that, from here on, in his biggest challenge is himself -- and when you reach that point, it’s fun."

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/15380746/rodgers-no-longer-has-to-demonstrate-hes-one-of-games-best 

Clarke Judge wrote:


UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
The premise is sheer bullshit. He had nothing to prove before the Super Bowl. He has nothing to prove afterward. His performance and numbers over three years speak for themselves. Last year it didn't all come together for him. This year it did. It may or may not happen again in 2011 -- doesn't change the fact he is an amazing quarterback putting together easily the best string of first three seasons in the history of the NFL.

Then again, I don't let myself get blinded by bling.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
lol he still remembers where the Cardinals picked
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago
The entire premise is nonsense.. you as a player should have to prove that you can play up to your potential yearly. It is not that one day you are handed this exclusionary card that you no longer have to earn your kept and place in the game.

The entire article is written around the talking head, IE Cowherd, that seem to think the only thing that matters in the W and L column is the QB play.. well except when it suits his argument that is. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

The entire premise is nonsense.. you as a player should have to prove that you can play up to your potential yearly. It is not that one day you are handed this exclusionary card that you no longer have to earn your kept and place in the game.

The entire article is written around the talking head, IE Cowherd, that seem to think the only thing that matters in the W and L column is the QB play.. well except when it suits his argument that is. ;)

Originally Posted by: Pack93z 



Someone loves QB's ...
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
13 years ago
Jamie Dukes
Skip Bayless
Colin Cowherd

They all claimed Rodgers was not elite before he won a playoff game. But I ask now, did Rodgers suddenly change during the Eagles game? Because to me, he looked like the same guy who tore shit up in the regular season. Did he change during the Super Bowl, into something he hadn't been? No. It doesn't make that big of a difference if you have won a playoff game, or a Super Bowl really. A QB should be judged by how well he plays, not because of what accolades he has accomplished with his team.
This is a placeholder
nerdmann
13 years ago
Rodgers is clutch. He showed that in the playoffs and he shows it on third down. That's one thing he's got over the old gunslinger. Favre played on adrenaline. Rodgers has ice in his veins.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nyrpack
13 years ago
he proved all the doubters out there

superbowl mvp !!
jimmy b.
zombieslayer
13 years ago

Jamie Dukes
Skip Bayless
Colin Cowherd

They all claimed Rodgers was not elite before he won a playoff game. But I ask now, did Rodgers suddenly change during the Eagles game? Because to me, he looked like the same guy who tore shit up in the regular season. Did he change during the Super Bowl, into something he hadn't been? No. It doesn't make that big of a difference if you have won a playoff game, or a Super Bowl really. A QB should be judged by how well he plays, not because of what accolades he has accomplished with his team.

Originally Posted by: Packers_Finland 



Nice. They're on my list for receiving flaming poo.

(I don't know if you have that custom in Finland. It's when you leave a paper bag with doggie doo in it and light it on fire, then ring the doorbell and run).
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
voiceofreason
13 years ago
Dan Marino!
blank
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : don't care
Zero2Cool (6h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (14h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (14h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (15h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (15h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (16h) : Who? What?
beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

9h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.