Laser Gunns
13 years ago
By Kevin Seifert

GREEN BAY, Wis. -- Randall Cobb is already in the NFC North blog doghouse.

When a reporter noted that the Green Bay Packers haven't returned a kick for a touchdown since 2000, Cobb smiled and said: "I was 10 years old."

Regular readers know that I haven't quite accepted that players born in 1990 are now in the NFL. (Cobb's ridiculous birthday: Aug. 22, 1990. So, in other words, is still three weeks away from age 21.)

But from what I've seen so far here at Packers training camp, it won't be hard for Cobb to redeem himself. There are some players whose open-field running ability translates even in the most laid-back practices, and Cobb has shown the same kinds of glimpses we once saw from Percy Harvin, Devin Hester and others.

The return of free agent James Jones might put the squeeze on Cobb's early-season receiving role, but he'll get an extended opportunity to win the kickoff- and punt-return duties this summer.

The Packers rotated a number of players through the return portion of practice this weekend, from Cobb to rookie running back Alex Green to cornerback Pat Lee to receiver Jordy Nelson. But there has been no mistaking the difference in Cobb's acceleration and aggressiveness in the return game, and on more than one occasion he has drawn whistles from a knowledgeable crowd.

"Returning is definitely a lot easier [than playing receiver] just for the fact that it's a natural play," Cobb said. "You're just able to be back there and make a play. ... All you have to do is understand the blocking and the concept and you're off."

The Packers haven't had a kick return for a touchdown since Allen Rossum took back a kickoff 92 yards on Nov. 19, 2000. (When I was NOT 10 years old.)

"Hopefully that's something I'll be able to do moving forward," Cobb said, "and take that task on and help us get better field position to start the offense."

It shouldn't devalue kick returns in any way to point out that, immediately following the draft, most of you were hoping Cobb would immediately step in as a multipositional receiver/returner/running back/wildcat quarterback in the mold of Percy Harvin. That could all come soon enough, but for now the Packers are smartly limiting his exposure.

While he has worked at all three receiving positions and has even served as the holder in special-teams drills, Cobb hasn't yet gotten an indication that the Packers will use him in the backfield.

"If they want," he said, "I'll be happy to do it. But that's not anything we've put in or even looked toward doing. That's not something I'm really worried about right now. I'm just trying to learn the basic stuff."

Which is a task for any rookie, not to mention one who was drafted into a lockout that canceled offseason contact before training camp. Cobb's first reaction when he saw the Packers' offensive playbook? "It was huge," he said. Learning three receiving positions, plus multiple roles on special teams, is probably enough for this summer.

"I'm trying to ... learn as much as I can to get on the field as fast as I can," he said.

At this pace, it shouldn't be long.

Kevin Seifert wrote:



MintBaconDrivel
Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
13 years ago
Cobb was learning to walk when I was in Desert Storm.

It was bad enough last year when Bulaga was starting and is 3 weeks younger than my son.

Well it was bad in 1999 when Cheryl Tiegs was on the cover of AARP's magazine.

The Packers are a young team.
blank
13 years ago
I am excited to see this kid play
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
I love reading/talking about the players on the field.
Cobb will be something special on the return team this year.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
Neat, he shares his birthday with Keiana.
UserPostedImage
beast
13 years ago

Cheryl Tiegs

Originally Posted by: CaliforniaCheez 


who's that?

AARP

Originally Posted by: CaliforniaCheez 


what's that?


[sarcasm]
UserPostedImage
lords_of_thelema
13 years ago

Cobb was learning to walk when I was in Desert Storm.

It was bad enough last year when Bulaga was starting and is 3 weeks younger than my son.

Well it was bad in 1999 when Cheryl Tiegs was on the cover of AARP's magazine.

The Packers are a young team.

Originally Posted by: CaliforniaCheez 



I'd still hit it.
blank
13 years ago

I'd still hit it.

Originally Posted by: lords_of_thelema 



What, the team?

I agree with Twinkiegorilla.

bozz_2006 wrote:


Yerko
13 years ago
From what I have been reading through Twitter, Cobb tore it up the first night of pads. I am confident that this kid will have the most impact of any rookie on the team (said that somewhere a little after draft time). He will help the return game and add more depth to this offense. The best thing about him is his eagerness to make an instant impact on the team. He has the best players surrounding him to learn from and doesn't have to be rushed into the game.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
13 years ago
Great catches over the middle like Cobb's are eye popping exciting. That said I am always a little skeptical of the performance of players in TC when they are said to have looked so much better than others. Even with pads on they are not going full contact on every down. I think the rule of thumb is that they are to practice at about 75%. So if one player thinks that 62% is his 75% level and someone else is at 94% they will certainly stand out. Which is one of the reasons there are fights in TC from time to time. A veteran like Clifton doesn't have to practice at as high of a level as Lang or McDonald do in order to be the starter.
I am glad the coaching staff has the ability to even out in the reps in their evaluations.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (1h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (1h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (1h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (1h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (1h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (1h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (1h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (2h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (2h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (2h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (3h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (3h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (3h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (3h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (3h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (4h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (4h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (4h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (4h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (5h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (5h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (6h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (6h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (7h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (7h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (7h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (7h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (7h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (7h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (7h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (7h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (7h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (7h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (7h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (7h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (7h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (7h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (7h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (7h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (8h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (8h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (8h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (8h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (8h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (8h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (8h) : Packers will get in
beast (8h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

6h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.