DakotaT
13 years ago

I lost interest in becoming a Professor after the PC police cracked down on Profs sleeping with students. WTF. That should be a perk.

Back on topic - agreed about Jenkins. Replacing him won't be easy. WHEN he's on the field, he's elite. His stats prove that. He makes tackles AND sacks QBs. Not too many 3-4 DL have comparable stats.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




Just cause Zero's been menstral lately doesn't mean we have to be good little soldiers.

I'd argue that Dom and Tgvorac will be able to make a pass rushing specialist out of Mike Neal and big Howard can stuff the run better than Jenkins.

Let's spend the money wasted on Barnett, Jenkins, and J.Jones and blow everyone's minds for Oshumugha. Then he Woodson can ease into retirement.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Just cause Zero's been menstral lately doesn't mean we have to be good little soldiers.

Originally Posted by: DakotaT 





UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
What does menstral mean? Is that a minstral when her monthly courses be upon her?
UserPostedImage
beast
13 years ago
I agree the title isn't the best for this piece but I like the idea of an article pointing possible guys to step up and that might be over looked.


QB Flynn: Hopefully he's not on the field unless we're up by a ton, because that means something would of happened to Rodgers.

RB Green: Grant and Starks haven't been the best blockers and Jackson might be gone, while Green was a very good pass blocker and pass catcher in a passing spread offense in college. So there is the chance he could become the 3rd down back. Though I think Starks has more power for short yardages downs. Starks also caught pretty well in college so he might be the 3rd down back if he's blocking improves and/or Green isn't ready quite yet.

WR Nelson: Nelson had his break out when they needed wins, but the question is can he keep it up? They Packers might need him to if Jones is gone and Driver and/or Finley don't bounce back from a year with injuries.

OT Tauscher: Ummm wouldn't OT Sherrod or OL Lang be a better choice, seeing as Tuasher said he doesn't know if he's coming back? Lang will probably get the first shot at LG if Colledge doesn't come back and Sherrod will back-up the OTs and if he performs well enough might also get a shot at LG. Also some rumors out there, that if Tausher doesn't come back as a player, the Packers might offer him the assistant offensive line coach position which who knows Tausher might be able to make an impact there.

DE Neal: Didn't play a lot but looked like he over power guys, and the scary thing is he can get better... also I thought DL Green did pretty well himself... I wonder if he lost some weight (to get quicker) and focused in on 3-4 DE if he could be a big player there.

OLB Zombo: I think Zombo gets over looked because he wasn't flashy, fancy or overly quick at all but point blank he brought the physical play and control his gaps to his side. His bull rush pushed guys back a bit, but needs to get a bit lower/stronger with it and needs to learn how to work other moves off of his bull rush (which Coach Greene made a great career for himself that way) but Zombo did very well for a rookie at a new position.

WR Cobb: Should be a big improvement as a returner but still the blocking in front of him needs to get better (they did draft another STer in TE Ryan Taylor) and from some of the things Mike McCarthy has said I'm expecting a WR screen to Cobb (hopefully with Nelson or TE blocking) and they could go 4 wide.

P Masthay: Masthay had some very good games, like against the Jets.
UserPostedImage
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
beast you did a good job. If the guy who wrote this article hadn't said that these players would be critical for GB to return to the SB I would have been more willing to listen to him.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (2h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (16h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (19h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (19h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (19h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (19h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (19h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (19h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (19h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (19h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (21h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (21h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (22h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

8h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.