wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
7 Players Surprisingly Crucial to a Super Bowl Repeat 


We all know how important Aaron Rodgers, Greg Jennings, Clay Matthews and Charles Woodson are to the Green Bay Packers chances to repeat as Super Bowl Champions. However, there are 53 players on a football roster and each man is a necessary piece of the puzzle.

While players like Matt Flynn and Frank Zombo might not get the same recognition that Aaron Rodgers and Clay Matthews get, they are still crucial players to Green Bay. I'm not saying that Flynn and Zombo, or any other player on this list, is as talented as Rodgers and Matthews, I'm just saying that Aaron and Clay can't win the Super Bowl by themselves.

If Green Bay wants to once again hoist the Lombardi Trophy following the 2011 season, here are eight crucial players to their pursuit as repeat champions.

Matt Flynn QB
I'm really hoping that Matt Flynn only sees the football field due to the Green Bay Packers being up by 30 points in the fourth quarter. Unfortunately, I don't see that happening.

Aaron Rodgers had some trouble last year with concussions. He was knocked out of the game against Detroit and missed the entire New England game. While Flynn lost both games, he performed well and was crucial in keeping the Packers clicking towards the end of the season.

Flynn will need to stay sharp the entire season just in case Rodgers gets knocked out of a crucial game. He has the ability to be a starter in this league someday and is a great back-up to Rodgers

Alex Green RB
With Brandon Jackson likely leaving during free agency, Alex Green should become Green Bay's third down back. He might not see much action, but the action he does see will be very important.

Considering the fact that Green Bay loves to use their running back in the pass game, Green might potentially have a solid rookie year. He could become a similar weapon like Kevin Faulk was in New England for so many years.

Third down is a huge down in football, so when Green is on the field, he is going to need to make plays for the Packers to succeed.

Jordy Nelson WR
Jordy Nelson had a breakout performance during the Super Bowl and he should be able to continue to play at that level throughout the upcoming season. With Greg Jennings, Donald Driver and Jermichael Finley, why is Jordy Nelson crucial for Green Bay?

First, Donald Driver is getting old and his play is diminishing. We also haven't seen a complete season from Finley, so that really only leaves Jennings as a proven receiving threat. Nelson has the talent to be a solid second option for Rodgers and is dynamic in the open field.

If Nelson continues to grow and fixes his slight issue with dropped passes, he could develop into a great complement opposite Jennings.
Mark Tauscher OT
Mark Tauscher is near the end of his career and lost his starting job, due to injury, to rookie Bryan Bulaga last season. However, Tauscher can still prove to be a vital asset to Green Bay.

The Packers were hit hard by the injury bug last season. Even though I don't expect anything close to 16 players ending up on injured reserved, every team loses some players to injury and Green Bay will be no different.

Should Clifton, Bulaga or any other offensive lineman go down for an extended period of time, Tauscher will need to step in and keep Rodgers off his back.

Mike Neal DE
If Cullen Jenkins leaves during the upcoming free agency period, Mike Neal has a great shot at become his replacement. The most likely scenario is that Neal and Wilson will split time until one player proves to be the long-term answer for the Packers.

I expect Neal to separate himself from Wilson early on and become Green Bay's starting defensive end. In Dom Capers aggressive defensive there needs to be pressure off the edge. The Packers were most successful on defense when Cullen Jenkins and Ryan Pickett were getting pressure on the quarterback.

If Green Bay wants to ride their aggressive defense through the playoffs again, Mike Neal will need to have a big season.

Frank Zombo
Clay Matthews was dominant during the 2010 season, but the same can't be said about whoever was opposite him on the field. That will need to drastically change as teams will focus heavily on Matthews.

Frank Zombo only recorded four sacks in 13 games last season. Brad Jones didn't do much better, as he failed to record any sacks in the six games he played in. Sacks isn't the only important stat to an outside linebacker, but when offenses don't need to worry about a player attacking their quarterback, they can focus more of their attention towards Matthews.

There is no doubting the importance of Clay, but his success, and the overall success of the team, could weigh heavily on the shoulders of Zombo.

Randall Cobb KR/PR
It is possible that Randall Cobb could see the field in numerous ways next season. At Kentucky, Cobb was a threat to score in numerous ways including running, receiving and throwing for touchdowns.

Cobb will most likely only see the field on special teams his rookie season, but he could eventually become a rather unique threat as a receiver too. Green Bay has been terrible in punt and kick returns in recent years. Hopefully, Randall Cobb can change that trend.

Many forget the importance of special teams during a game, but just look at Chicago's success because of Devin Hester. Cobb probably won't have that type of an impact, but if Cobb can consistently give the Packers good field position it will only increase the potency of their offense.

Tim Masthay P
That's right, I said it.

A punter is crucial to the Packers repeating as Super Bowl Champions. How many times last season did Masthay keep the ball away from dangerous return men and pin teams deep in their own territory? In fact, in Green Bay's final regular season game against Chicago, Masthay might have been the MVP of that game.

If Green Bay wants to get past teams like Chicago and Philadelphia and their dangerous return men, Masthay will need to kick the ball beautifully.




Crucial? I seriously doubt GB makes the SB if Matt has to start in Rodgers place. I can't see imagine Tauscher being on the team this year. I am sure Cobb will do fine but I hardly think his returns will be crucial to making a return to the SB. It is funny that they compare him to Hester. They made it only once with Hester AND DID NOT WIN THE GAME. So much for wanting to "Be Like Devon."

UserPostedImage
nerdmann
13 years ago
Tauscher is done. They're gonna run some trick plays to Cobb. Watch for the reverse with an option to pass. Most importantly, he will enable Tramon Williams to not have to risk life and limb on PR.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
zombieslayer
13 years ago
Wow. This guy seriously smokes crack.

Matt Flynn? I guess he holds the clipboard better than ANYONE else in the NFL. Yes. Extremely crucial. How can we win a single game without him?

Alex Green? He'll more than likely get 0 carries when we win the SB after this upcoming season.

Jordy Nelson? OK. Good pick. He played a heck of a game in the SB last year.

Mark Tauscher? He probably won't even be on the team.

Mike Neal? I wouldn't say he's crucial. I hope he does well. But crucial to our success? Once again I ask, is this writer smoking crack?

Frank Zombo? See my response to Mike Neal.

Randall Cobb? I can see him as our returner. Would be awesome if he broke one in the SB.

Tim Mashay? Uh. His services won't be needed in the SB. Heck, I'll punt for us. My single 40 yard punt with 2 seconds hang-time won't really hurt the team that much.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

Wow. This guy seriously smokes crack.

Matt Flynn? I guess he holds the clipboard better than ANYONE else in the NFL. Yes. Extremely crucial. How can we win a single game without him?

Alex Green? He'll more than likely get 0 carries when we win the SB after this upcoming season.

Jordy Nelson? OK. Good pick. He played a heck of a game in the SB last year.

Mark Tauscher? He probably won't even be on the team.

Mike Neal? I wouldn't say he's crucial. I hope he does well. But crucial to our success? Once again I ask, is this writer smoking crack?

Frank Zombo? See my response to Mike Neal.

Randall Cobb? I can see him as our returner. Would be awesome if he broke one in the SB.

Tim Mashay? Uh. His services won't be needed in the SB. Heck, I'll punt for us. My single 40 yard punt with 2 seconds hang-time won't really hurt the team that much.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer 




I posted it as much for laughs as anything.
Now Zombo is going to be the key this year. snork [roflmao]
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
13 years ago
I see what the writer is doing, though. I mean, this list could contain Rodgers, Woodson, Matthews, Raji etc and be the 90th article about who our best players are and how we're most likely going to need them if we want to win another SB. He went a different route and looked at our depth, see who we could really need to fall back on...

That said, there are still some iffy picks on there.

For a repeat, we certainly don't need Flynn. Mainly because we won't repeat with Flynn under center. You better have a very dominant team on defence and on the ground if you want to get away with playing an average QB, a la Trent Dilfer. And fairy tale endings like those with Jeff Hostetler don't happen all too often, either.

He might pick us up a game or two on the route to the play-offs, though, if that's what he means, and keep us in contention.

Mark Tauscher being vital is total BS. You have Clifton and Bulaga starting, you have Sherrod as a back-up at LT and Lang could still kick outside to the RT spot. Tauscher is pretty much obsolete right now.

I guess we could go with Frank Zombo as an important player, since we really lack talent opposite of Clay. I could see him get some snaps on running downs, going out in favor of Walden on passing downs.
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

I see what the writer is doing, though. I mean, this list could contain Rodgers, Woodson, Matthews, Raji etc and be the 90th article about who our best players are and how we're most likely going to need them if we want to win another SB. He went a different route and looked at our depth, see who we could really need to fall back on...

That said, there are still some iffy picks on there.

For a repeat, we certainly don't need Flynn. Mainly because we won't repeat with Flynn under center. You better have a very dominant team on defence and on the ground if you want to get away with playing an average QB, a la Trent Dilfer. And fairy tale endings like those with Jeff Hostetler don't happen all too often, either.

He might pick us up a game or two on the route to the play-offs, though, if that's what he means, and keep us in contention.

Mark Tauscher being vital is total BS. You have Clifton and Bulaga starting, you have Sherrod as a back-up at LT and Lang could still kick outside to the RT spot. Tauscher is pretty much obsolete right now.

I guess we could go with Frank Zombo as an important player, since we really lack talent opposite of Clay. I could see him get some snaps on running downs, going out in favor of Walden on passing downs.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 




While we don't need yet another article on the best players on the team, I wish he would have used a different word instead of "critical".

Zombo is a good one to use when discussing the second level of players but he is not critical nor are most of the ones mentioned here.

Talking about Shields, Burnett, Bishop, Peprah or even Bush would make more sense than Tauscher, Flynn or even Masthay
UserPostedImage
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
13 years ago
I agree with all the criticisms of the original author save one.

I think he's right about Neal (or whoever ends up replacing Jenkins). Apart from the questions I still have about the OL (which I won't go into again here), and apart from the consequences if Rodgers or Matthews goes down for any length of time, I think that DE position offers the biggest threat to repeating as champs.

Yes, Jenkins missed 5 games. But even with the missed games, he was a critical component of the team's success last year. And so will be whoever replaces his production. Or doesn't: if Neal et al don't provide close to what Jenkins did, then (i) opposing quarterbacks are going to have more time to find open receivers; (ii) its going to be easier for players to run to that side; and (iii) it's going to be harder for CMIII to wreak his havoc.

If Jenkins is, as all reports have it, as good as gone, Ted and Mike are taking a major risk. Good as Neal looked before he got hurt, he wasn't yet at Jenkins' level. And he has to be reasonably close to that level if the Packers are going to go where we all want them to go.

So, yes, I think Neal (or at least the position he is scheduled to play) is critical.


And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member Topic Starter
13 years ago

I agree with all the criticisms of the original author save one.

I think he's right about Neal (or whoever ends up replacing Jenkins). Apart from the questions I still have about the OL (which I won't go into again here), and apart from the consequences if Rodgers or Matthews goes down for any length of time, I think that DE position offers the biggest threat to repeating as champs.

Yes, Jenkins missed 5 games. But even with the missed games, he was a critical component of the team's success last year. And so will be whoever replaces his production. Or doesn't: if Neal et al don't provide close to what Jenkins did, then (i) opposing quarterbacks are going to have more time to find open receivers; (ii) its going to be easier for players to run to that side; and (iii) it's going to be harder for CMIII to wreak his havoc.

If Jenkins is, as all reports have it, as good as gone, Ted and Mike are taking a major risk. Good as Neal looked before he got hurt, he wasn't yet at Jenkins' level. And he has to be reasonably close to that level if the Packers are going to go where we all want them to go.

So, yes, I think Neal (or at least the position he is scheduled to play) is critical.

Originally Posted by: Wade 




That can be said about any position- If the defensive player (insert name here) doesn't produce the opposing QB will have more time to find his target. If the offensive player doesn't produce (insert name here) Aaron won't have the time he needs.
UserPostedImage
Stevetarded
13 years ago
Nobody we start is likely to be as productive or as good as Jenkins right away so if that's what anybody is expecting you can forget it. I'm not quite as worried about the depth. The depth is still pretty good there with CJ Wilson and Howard Green as back ups. Hopefully Guy turns out too and can be a good addition.
blank
Greg C.
13 years ago
Worst article I've read in a long time, and there have been plenty of horrible articles this off-season. Not even worth commenting on.
blank
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (50m) : don't care
Zero2Cool (5h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
packerfanoutwest (13h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (13h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (14h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (14h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (15h) : Who? What?
beast (23h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
6h / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

8h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

14h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.