In contrast with Favre, Rodgers fine with accepting blame· Page 5

longtimefan
Registered

16 years ago

14-3 last year Cheesey is proof enough for me.

I think some people are in denial about that.

4-12 is just a ridiculous statement because Tedrow was signing WR's off the street. This is basically the same team as last year!

"Gravedigga" wrote:

I want this out the way right now b4 I am lied about or labeled something..

Brett Favre should be the q/b in GB, it was a mess, and I think for the most part for THIS YEAR he would have given us a better chance..

Now............

This is the same team as last year? REALLY????????

This year D is giving up about 21 points per game..

Last year after 10 games... 16 points per game..

Rushing per game this year? 150 per GAME

Last year? 90 per game..

Yeah same team my ass..

2nd points

I think there were at LEAST 2 games last year that if it werent for the D, the pack end up at 11-5 for season..

Now move ahead to this year..We have the Minny game and the Titan game..

The D did not step up in those 2 games..If they stepped up for those 2 this year, like they did for the 2 last year, this team would be 7-3

Lets use your logic Rod..

Brett Favre made the team 14-4 ( you forgot the loss in the NFCCG)

Well, if Brett Favre got them all those wins, then he sure got them all the losses too?? If you say no, then you understand its a team sport..and can't pin everything on one player

The last loss vs the Giants was cuz of an int, Al Harris blowing like a leaf, the o-l sucking like the corner girl...See how the entire team had a part? The TEAM ended up losing that game

That is the one issue I have with the Brett Favre "fisters" they give him all the credit for the wins, but the losses, nope someone elses problem..

Then when it Aaron Rodgers we are talking about its his fault for all the losses, no one esles problems

"longtimefan" wrote:

Thats what happens when your offense is one sided. More 3 & outs, more snaps by the defense = more tired defenders, more blown assignments and more defensive injuries, less respeck for the run game, less of an ability to mask the O-lines weakness. When you cant convert key 3rd downs consistently, this is what happens. You go from a 13-3 team to a decent team that might finish 8-8.

Yes, Aaron makes some plays but he is not consistent and too young to be leaned on. They will win or lose more as a team this year than last year. That consistency Favre gave us is the glue that held the team together last year making us elite instead of just average.

"Gravedigga" wrote:

okay I am going to TRUST that your right on the 3 and outs..

Only until I can verify those myself..

I posted facts and numbers.,..

Now can you provide EVERYONE with same facts to back up your claims?

"longtimefan" wrote:

Facts and numbers..........man, thats time consuming. Plus, if you give me enough time, i will figure out a way at making the nubmers support my argument even if they dont :physassult:

"Roddyboy" wrote:

ROFLLLLLL

:cyclopsani:

Well , Aaron Rodgers leds league in td thrown on 3rd down ...10 to 3 int

BF? 3 tds to 6 ints

Kurt W 4 to 1

Phlip Rivers 9 to 3

P Manning 6 to 4

E Manning 5 to 1

longtimefan
Registered

16 years ago

#42

okay found something

GB 3rd % is 41.9...good for 13th in the league

this year 3 D %

Ahhh but you want to know last years?>?

last year 3 D %

42.6

YES 7 tenths of a % point better LAST year to this year for 3rd down conversion

So still want to stick with this year lot more 3 and outs or got something else?

RedSoxExcel
Registered

16 years ago

#43

Roddyboy, nobody's denying how well Favre played last year. My worries arose from the second Bears game, and the Giants game. when the weather was gross, so was Favre's performance.

"bozz_2006" wrote:

How come everyone ignores the Seahawks game? We were down 14-0 after like 5 minutes and then Favre and the Offense scored TD's I think on 6 straight drives.

blank

Roddyboy
Registered

16 years ago

#44

Because it doesn't fit the talking point (argument)... :profileright:

blank

dingus
Member

16 years ago

#45

Because it was neither as cold or windy as the games he mentioned.

blank

Roddyboy
Registered

16 years ago

#46

Now, it was just a snow-storm out with snow sticking to the ground and the ball and everything...

Tell me Dingus, or anyone, who on the Packers roster played well in the Chicago or Giants game on those days?

I'd love to hear an answer to that question....

blank

longtimefan
Registered

16 years ago

#47

"Roddyboy" wrote:

Grant did in Chicago, just couldnt get the ball much being down as much as they were..

Giants game? LOL DD had one reall outstanding play..But other then that maybe Crosby, he hit 2 big FG

longtimefan
Registered

16 years ago

#48

"longtimefan" wrote:

Grav?

Grav??

Bueller??

Bueller?

dingus
Member

16 years ago

#49

The team played well enough to get to OT in the NFCCG (thank god he missed in regulation) and had the ball with a chance to score in said OT.

blank

Roddyboy
Registered

16 years ago

#50

Favre was the reason they got into overtime, Dingus...

If the rest of the team was playing, it never would have gone to OT...(like if Ruvell Martin could catch the damn ball), but I guess that's conveniently forgotten...

:roll:

blank

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Mucky Tundra (3h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore

packerfanoutwest (9h) : Feliz Navidad!

Zero2Cool (13h) : Merry Christmas!

beast (22h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁

beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won

Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier

buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol

Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???

Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS