Announcement PH Beta → Check it out! Click Me! (you might be see "unsafe", but it is safe)
DakotaT
13 years ago

Matt Leinart invites minors (under 18 years old) over for hot tub parties (with alcohol).

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



So?

"beast" wrote:



Not this shit again.
UserPostedImage
beast
13 years ago

Matt Leinart invites minors (under 18 years old) over for hot tub parties (with alcohol).

"DakotaT" wrote:



So?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Not this shit again.

"beast" wrote:



Not sure which shit you're talking about but I believe a 25 or 26 year old (which ever he was at the time) should have more important things to do then trying to get 16 and 17 years old girls drunk enough to lay him (or his buddies)....

If nothing else make sure they're legal age so you can't be arrested for doing it... I mean it's not like he lacks money... (unless he's stupidly spent it all already...)
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago


Not sure which shit you're talking about but I believe a 25 or 26 year old (which ever he was at the time) should have more important things to do then trying to get 16 and 17 years old girls drunk enough to lay him (or his buddies)....

If nothing else make sure they're legal age so you can't be arrested for doing it... I mean it's not like he lacks money... (unless he's stupidly spent it all already...)

"beast" wrote:



Don't worry beast, I'm with you on this one. I've been arguing with Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dumbass for several years about Chmura. Zero and Non defend him because he was squeezed through the window of reasonable doubt.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Zero and Non defend him because he was squeezed through the window of reasonable doubt.

"DakotaT" wrote:



I've never defended Mark Chmura in his sexual assault/whatever case. I merely pointed out that for ANYONE who's been accused of something and found innocent, it's down right moronic to walk around as if they are guilty, based off being ACCUSED. Been in those shoes and if I could take a baseball bat to every asshole that was that ignorant, I'd be swinging all god damn day and loving every mother fucking minute of it. That's right.

Get your facts straight before you saying I did something or not.
UserPostedImage
DakotaT
13 years ago

Zero and Non defend him because he was squeezed through the window of reasonable doubt.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



I've never defended Mark Chmura in his sexual assault/whatever case. I merely pointed out that for ANYONE who's been accused of something and found innocent, it's down right moronic to walk around as if they are guilty, based off being ACCUSED. Been in those shoes and if I could take a baseball bat to every asshole that was that ignorant, I'd be swinging all god damn day and loving every mother fucking minute of it. That's right.

Get your facts straight before you saying I did something or not.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Chmura is a douche! He wasn't found innocent, was found not guilty with a whole lot of speculation to be had by all.

He was not innocent in the court of public opinion and never will be. Why you and NON defend chu chu boy, I'll never understand.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Chmura is a douche! He wasn't found innocent, was found not guilty with a whole lot of speculation to be had by all.

He was not innocent in the court of public opinion and never will be. Why you and NON defend chu chu boy, I'll never understand.

"DakotaT" wrote:



I don't know who chu chu boy is. Sounds like you spouting off what you can't back up, same ole same ole.

I never argued that Chmura was not a douche, in fact, I stated my reasons as for feeling he is a douche. :)

Very true, found NOT guilty, not Innocent. There is a difference.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
beast (1h) : I was rooting for the Bears to win and hurt their draft pick status
Zero2Cool (1h) : Forgot there was even a game last night haha
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : That was terrible.
TheKanataThrilla (1h) : Watching that game in its entirety yesterday is proof positive that I am a football addict.
beast (2h) : And horrible time management multiple times... and not being able to score more than 3 points on a team with talent
beast (2h) : Realizing the Bears didn't fix it from the previous week and do the same thing, getting the game to overtime
beast (2h) : They probably are not tanking, but they've absolutely mismanagement some things, such as Vikings seeing the Packers blocked FG and realizing
Zero2Cool (3h) : Crazy of Bears to have that mindset that is
Zero2Cool (3h) : Hail Mary stop away from 5 - 2. Not sure how that flips to tanking. Crazy mindset if true
beast (3h) : I've quietly questioned if Bears are tanking on purpose... they suddenly got a lot worse with some simple concepts like 101 clock management
wpr (6h) : Watching bares fans melt down over how putrid their team is, so enjoyable. It's the gift that keeps on giving.
Mucky Tundra (13h) : The Seattle Seahawks defeat the Chicago Bears 6-3. Jason Myers had 6 RBIs for Seattle while Cairo Santos had 3 RBI for Chicago
beast (14h) : Not nessarily, he might of been injured either way. He's playing about 50% of the games the last 4 years
Zero2Cool (20h) : If they'd been more patient with him, he'd be back already. Putting him out there vs Bears caused him to tweak it and here we are.
packerfanoutwest (20h) : well this is his last season with the PAck, book it
beast (22h) : Sounds like no Alexander (again), I'm wondering if his time with the Packers is done
Zero2Cool (26-Dec) : Could ban beast and I still don't think anyone catches him.
Mucky Tundra (26-Dec) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (25-Dec) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas!
beast (25-Dec) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
35m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

39m / Random Babble / Martha Careful

41m / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

10h / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.