PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
The biggest issue the Owners/League had with the previous CBA is that the players had to big of a chunk and with salary increases, they are/were having difficult times trying to keep increasing the revenue so the cap could be raised, so the next player could one up the last guy.

Here is a solution that should fit both sides. Instead of basing the Cap on a prediction of what revenue might be, base in on the known value of the year prior. Be that 50% or 60% or something else. Then instead of contract specifying 10million for some player, allocate them a percentage. Each team has to allocate between 90% and 100% creating the min, max salaries for teams.

Now assume the cap was determined to be 100 Millon. If the QB for that year was under contract to get 5.25%, he would get 5.2 million. If the previous year was bad and the cap only ended up at 90 million, the player would only get $4.725 million.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Formo
14 years ago
I like this. Simple and makes sense.

But then, I'm not a numbers guy.

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Pack93z
14 years ago
The issues that are on the table are so much deeper than the percentage of Operating Revenue so to speak.

Currently, as I understand it, the yearly CBA contract pools all shared revenue, a Billion is clipped off the top to establish the "Operating Revenue".

That billion is to cover fixed costs like stadium expenses and hard costs to the owners.

What as they are discussing this new CBA the owners now want the One Billion to become 2 Billions, based on rising expenditures, such as labor costs and energy hikes.

Then they are willing to stay at the 58/42 split that is in place today.. 58 percent of Operating Revenue to the Players. This is where your cap talk comes into play, which your idea would be an excellent solution.

Now of course there are a plethora of other issues such as rookie wage scales that will redistribute where player costs are spent.. basically more going to the proven players and a lower risk to the Owners on unproven players.

The Players in turn are looking to protect their chunk of the pie and extended benefits past playing.. additionally a improved retirement package for players.

Going back to the Operating vs Total revenue costs...

I forget the year in which they were talking about this.. but the total revenue was around 10 Billions.. a credit of a billion brought the operating revenue to the 9 Billion dollar ball park.. adding another Billion to that formula would equate a net loss to the players share of 11%.. less than the much talked about 18%.

Darin Revell did a nice job explaining why they owners are looking for the extra Billion.. Debt overhead. Between stadium financing (Jerry Jones) and debt from Purchasing franchises that are erroding the Owners profit margins.

If I am a player.. I can accept the stadium debt as a shared cost to the good of the game.. however why should a player be responsible for the inability of an owner to have the capital to effective purchase and then operate a team. If you didn't have the means to purchase the team without a heavy debt margin, what in the world are you doing purchasing the team.

The underlying issue here that you can gather from the tea leaves is that you have the 1 Billion dollar pie that isn't being equally shared by the franchises due to supplemental revenue sharing to the team with lower gate draws.. our neighbors to the West come to mind.. you have them getting an extended chuck of the Billion dollar credit because they are losing money in their stadium. So you have a bit of conflict within the ownership group handing over this issue as well.

In a nutshell.. IMO.. it is going to take a considerable amount of time for one side or the other to give (Owner open the books or the Players accept this extended credit of some sort of negotiated level).

We the fans, the ones the ultimately make this roll just stand on the sidelines and accept it. Or will we?
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Excellent posts by both of you. Here is an article by the venerable Chris Mortensen on the situation.

Sources: NFL-union talks canceled
 

By Chris Mortensen
ESPN
Archive

NFL owners walked away from the negotiating table Wednesday when the NFL Players Association proposed to take an average of 50 percent of all revenue generated by the league, according to player sources.

NFLPA executive director DeMaurice Smith briefed club player representatives in a conference call Wednesday night, detailing his version of the abbreviated session that ended far earlier than the seven hours that were scheduled between the two sides in an effort to reach a new collective bargaining agreement before the current one expires at midnight March 3.

Consequently, a five-hour second negotiating session scheduled for Thursday was canceled, and no further meetings have been proposed. Also, the NFL notified teams and owners Thursday that a scheduled owners meeting in Philadelphia next Tuesday has been canceled, sources told ESPN.com's John Clayton.

"We wish we were negotiating today," NFLPA assistant executive director George Atallah said. "That's all I can say."

Wednesday's meeting in Washington started badly, one source said, when the owners' negotiating team interpreted the union's proposal of a 49 percent to 51 percent take as "total revenue," instead of the union's intended percentage take of "all revenue."

At the current revenue levels, "total revenue" has been defined as an estimated $9 billion gross, minus a $1 billion credit in the owners' favor. In the current CBA deal about to expire, the union's share has been estimated at about 60 percent of $8 billion, once the $1 billion credit was subtracted.

Owners have asked for an additional $1 billion credit -- or $2 billion in total -- before they split "total revenue" with players.

Smith has stated that the union would need to examine all of the owners' financial books before it would accept a substantial reduction in allowing the additional $1 billion credit.

To simplify talks, a player source said the union told the owners' negotiating team that it will forgo its request to examine the league's financial books by simply taking the flat 50 percent cut of "all revenue," which would eliminate $1 billion to $2 billion credits off the top and erase the definition of "total revenue."

A union source said that if the NFLPA accepted the owners' current proposal, it would receive a little more than 40 percent of all revenue.

Smith said in an interview with ESPN last week that a 40 percent to 42 percent share of all revenue would represent the smallest percentage of a players' share by any professional sports union.

In addition to the flat 50 percent share of all revenue, players are willing to grant additional credits to any franchise that reinvests in stadium improvement, a mechanism to motivate clubs to grow revenues, a player source said.

The union believes by taking a flat 50 percent share, it would eliminate the need to audit every expense clubs invest in order to offset credits built into the current CBA and the model proposed by owners going forward.

Smith also sent an e-mail, obtained by ESPN, to NFL agents on Thursday outlining the owners' latest rookie wage-scale proposal in January. He detailed how far apart the two sides are, and in an attached memo dated Jan. 26, said the NFL's latest proposal "is a veteran scale, not a rookie scale."

The NFL's owners continued to propose a five-year wage scale for first-rounders, four years for other drafted players, and no individually negotiated contracts. But, according to Smith, the owners added "league-wide base salary escalators."

Smith wrote that the owners' latest offer "makes the proposal worse not only for rookies, but for veteran players with three to five years in the league -- the core of our membership."

Also, players would not be able to renegotiate their contracts or agree to extensions until three years after they were drafted. Signing bonuses would be fixed, paid over the length of a contract and subject to forfeiture "if the player does not toe the Club's line in every way," Smith wrote.

In late September, the NFLPA proposed maximum four-year contracts for players drafted in the first three rounds, and three-year contracts for other drafted players.

The NFLPA's proposal also provided for individually negotiated contracts instead of the owners' proposed set salaries. In addition, a cap would be placed on rookie contract incentives and escalators. The money saved then would be used for a bonus pool for veteran players and rookies who outperformed their contract.

NFL spokesman Greg Aiello said: "Despite the inaccurate characterizations of yesterday's meeting, out of respect to the collective bargaining process and our negotiating partner, we are going to continue to conduct negotiations with the union in private and not engage in a point-counterpoint on the specifics of either side's proposals or the meeting process. Instead, we will work as hard as possible to reach a fair agreement by March 4. We are fully focused on that goal."

Meanwhile, the NFLPA continued to present its side of the argument to the public. The union was a guest of American Rights at Work, which brought in a beer vendor from Ford Field in Detroit as part of a news conference in the nation's capital aimed at demonstrating the effects a lockout would have on the economy.

"Football and other major sporting events are some of the only things that bring people to downtown Detroit after 5 p.m.," said John Marler, who has worked at the stadium since 2007.

Kimberly Freeman Brown, executive director of American Rights at Work, said the NFL and union are fussing over many of the same issues faced by many workers: pay cuts, longer working hours, workplace safety and health care. She said a lockout would have an impact on 150,000 jobs and cause more than $160 million in lost revenue in every city with an NFL team. She called a potential work stoppage "something that could potentially have devastating consequences on our quality of life and our mental health."

"For many fans, football is just that deep to us," Brown said.

Atallah defended the union's public relations tactics.

"It is important for us to stand with the people who are here on this panel, not for any publicity issue or publicity stunt," Atallah said. "This is real life for us. This is a reality that these people face."

Chris Mortensen is ESPN's senior NFL analyst. Information from the Associated Press was used in this report.


PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
(9B - 1B) X .58= 4,640,000,000
9B - 2B = 7B X .58 = 4,060,000,000
9B X .50 = 4,500,000,000

So the players offer lowered their take 140M or about 4+ million per team. I don't think that was enough of an insult to make the Owners walk. The rumor that they are holding out to get rid of that MN judge may be part of it.

Like I suggested, switch the salaries to % of the cap and base cap on Previous year. Then get in and talk about the rest. Adjust every existing contract to a % based on projected growth over the term, which will show what % is used by each team each upcoming year and how much room is remaining % wise. If 18 games is put through, 7% before 18 games and 7% after just means more money for the players and owners both. This would greatly reduce the constant one uping money wise which may also get the growth of salaries under control.

Get rid of the creative contracts, no more bogus incentives to move forward. No more signing bonus. Instead guarantee a percentage of contracts for injury. if injured in year 2 of 5 the final 3 should have maybe 20 or 30% guaranteed, and counted against the cap like Signing Bonuses spread across the length before.

This type of agreement gives both owners and players a pretty equal desire to grow revenue, where players didn't really care because they had that number on paper.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
DakotaT
14 years ago
It doesn't make much difference to me about the money; but what I want to see done is that the veteran players of the league are taken care of medically and financially. Yes, it's too bad that some of these guys squandered millions, but dammit - they are modern day gladiators and deserve to be looked after - especially in a sport as lucrative as the NFL.

And yes 93Z, the Vikings are still welfare case gutter whores, even if you say it more eloquently.
Formo
14 years ago


And yes 93Z, the Vikings are still welfare case gutter whores, even if you say it more eloquently.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Says King socialist gutter whore himself.

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
DakotaT
14 years ago


And yes 93Z, the Vikings are still welfare case gutter whores, even if you say it more eloquently.

"Formo" wrote:



Says King socialist gutter whore himself.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Bite me, I pay plenty of taxes, I just don't cry about it like you Baby Rush.
Formo
14 years ago


And yes 93Z, the Vikings are still welfare case gutter whores, even if you say it more eloquently.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Says King socialist gutter whore himself.

"Formo" wrote:



Bite me, I pay plenty of taxes, I just don't cry about it like you Baby Rush.

"DakotaT" wrote:



Nope. You'd rather pay more (and tell others how to spend their money, too).

Thanks to TheViking88 for the sig!!
Wade
  • Wade
  • Veteran Member
14 years ago
Gee, you guys are starting to go offtopic more often than I do.

:)
And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (8h) : Guess it's not official until the 12th
Zero2Cool (8h) : Deebo went for a 5th to Commanders?
Martha Careful (12h) : Just like my late husband!!
Zero2Cool (13h) : Once fired up, it should be good
Zero2Cool (13h) : Sometimes, the first page load will be slow. it's firing up the site.
Martha Careful (15h) : The site is operating much faster...tyvm
Mucky Tundra (28-Feb) : It's the offseason and the draft is still nearly 2 months away, what can ya do?🤷‍♂️
Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : NFL teams were notified today that the 2025 salary cap has been set at $279,200,000 per club.
Zero2Cool (27-Feb) : sssllllooooow
Martha Careful (27-Feb) : is it just me, or has the website been slow the last couple of days?
buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Damnit 2026 2nd rnd pick!
buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Packers get Myles Garret and Browns 2926 2nd rnd pick.
buckeyepackfan (26-Feb) : Browns get Jaire, + Packers #1 2025 pick and 2026 3rd rnd pick.
beast (26-Feb) : Rams trying to trade Stafford and Kupp, then signing Rodgers and Adams? Just speculation, but interesting
Zero2Cool (26-Feb) : Packers shopping Jaire Alexander per Ian Rapoport
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : Gutekunst and Jaire Alexander’s agent, John Thornton, are meeting this week in Indianapolis to determine the future of the Packers’ 28-year-
Zero2Cool (25-Feb) : Gutekunst says Mark Murphy told him he can trade their first-round pick despite the draft being in Green Bay.
Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : Packers. 🤦
Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : One team.
Zero2Cool (24-Feb) : One team petition NFL to ban Brotherly Shove.
beast (23-Feb) : Seems like he was just pissed because he was no longer the starter
beast (23-Feb) : Campbell is right, he's rich and he doesn't have to explain sh!t... but that attitude gives teams reasons to never sign him again.
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I have some doubt about all that
dfosterf (22-Feb) : I read De'Vondre Campbell's tweet this morning (via the New York Post) Florio says that if he invested his earnings wisely, he will be good
beast (20-Feb) : I haven't followed, but I believe he's good when healthy, just hasn't been able to stay healthy.
dfosterf (20-Feb) : Hasn"t Bosa missed more games than he has played in the last 3 years?
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : He hasn't been too bad when healthy but I don't feel like I ever heard much about when he is
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Felt like he was more interested in his body, than football. He flashed more than I expected
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : When he was coming out, I thought he'd be flash in pan.
Mucky Tundra (19-Feb) : Joey seems so forgettable compared to his brother for some reason
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : NFL informed teams today that the 2025 salary cap will be roughly $277.5M-$281.5M
Zero2Cool (19-Feb) : Los Angeles Chargers are likely to release DE Joey Bosa this off-season as a cap casualty, per league source.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : If the exploit is not fixed, we'll see tons of "50 top free agents, 50 perfect NFL team fits: We picked where each should sign in March" lo
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Issue should be solved, database cleaned and held strong working / meeting. Boom!
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : It should be halted now.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : usually spambots are trying to get traffic to shady websites filled with spyware; the two links being spammed were to the Packers website
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : you know when you put it that way combined with the links it was spamming (to the official Packers website)
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yep. You can do that with holding down ENTER on a command in Console of browser
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : even with the rapid fire posts?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I'm not certain it's a bot.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : I've got to go to work soon which is a pity because I'm enthralled by this battle between the bot and Zero
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : Yeah, I see what that did. Kind of funny.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : now it's a link to Wes Hodkiezwicz mailbag
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : Now they're back with another topic
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : oh lol
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : I have a script that purges them now.
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : 118 Topics with Message.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : what's 118 (besides a number)?
Zero2Cool (18-Feb) : They got 118 slapped in there.
Mucky Tundra (18-Feb) : that's why it confused the hell out of me
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM
Eagles
Recent Topics
6h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dhazer

7h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

28-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

28-Feb / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

26-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

24-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

24-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19-Feb / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.