macbob
  • macbob
  • Veteran Member Topic Starter
14 years ago
There were a number of quotes in here that I loved (bolded):


http://blog.triblive.com/view-from-the-press-box/2011/02/07/steelers-didnt-deserve-to-win/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+triblive%2Fblog%2FViewFromThePressBox+%28View+from+the+Press+Box+Blog%29 

February 7th, 2011 ARLINGTON, Texas --

Yes, the Steelers had a chance to win Super Bowl XLV.

Yes, they were in almost the same exact situation as they had been in December of 2009 when Ben Roethlisberger led an 86-yard touchdown drive -- after getting the ball with 2:06 left to play -- to beat the Packers by a point.

But the truth is the Steelers didnt deserve to win Sunday night at Cowboys Stadium even though the stage had been set for Roethlisberger to conjure up more of his fourth-quarter magic with his team trailing 31-25.

Starting at their own 13-yard line with just under two minutes to play the Steelers could only manage one first down before turning the ball over on downs.

I had a feeling we were going to do it again but we should have never been in that situation. Thats the discouraging part, Steelers wide receiver Hines Ward said. You cant beat a team like the Packers turning the ball over the way that we did.

The single biggest season why the Steelers failed to win their third Super Bowl in six seasons: they committed three turnovers, all of which led to Packers touchdowns, while not coming up with any takeaways.

Here are some other thoughts, quotes and observations from the Steelers second loss in eight Super Bowl appearances.

-- Take away strong safety Troy Polamalu and the Steelers secondary is suspect. And teams seemed to take the 2010 NFL Defensive Player of the Year out of games during the postseason by simply staying away from him -- something Aaron Rodgers did Sunday night.

Polamalu had three tackles and no passes defended in the Steelers' 31-25 loss. When asked if thought Polamalu had made an impact in the game, coach Mike Tomlin said, Ill let you be the judge.

Said Polamalu, I had some opportunities to make plays, I was just off a step or here there. Toughest (loss) Ive ever had in my life.

-- Polamalus running mate in the secondary and best friend on the Steelers sure didnt take the loss lightly.

Nothing separates us from the other 30 teams that werent here, free safety Ryan Clark said. Were just like them. All the work, all the adversity we overcame, its for nothing. Id just rather not be here if Im not going to take home the trophy.


-- If there was one call that Tomlin wanted back it was his decision to try a 52-yard field goal with four-and-a-half minutes to play in the third quarter.

The Steelers had cut the Packers lead to four points, had seized the momentum and had a chance to pin Green Bay deep in its own territory.

Shaun Suisham hooked the kick left of the goal post.

There was a terrible decision by me in hindsight, said Tomlin, who had been pleased with how Suisham kicked in pre-game warm ups. I took a calculated shot at it and it failed. But no judgment on Shaun Suisham. We picked him up along the way this season and hes one of the reasons that were here.

-- It was no surprise that the Packers were successful in spreading out the Steelers and attacking their defense with Rodgers and his deep stable of wide receivers.

Rodgers was a worthy MVP, and his numbers (24 of 39 for 304 yards and three touchdowns) could have been a lot better. I counted four drops by Packers receivers in the second half, including one by James Jones that would have gone for a long touchdown in the third quarter.

The Packers look like they could be good for a long time, and it all starts with Rodgers.

He just completed his third season as a starter, and Rodgers has already delivered as many Super Bowl titles to Green Bay as Brett Favre did.

I think people are going to write stories about him 10 years from now, Packers general manager Ted Thompson said. Even though hes done so much, hes still kind of just getting started.

Pittsburgh Tribune wrote:

wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
The fact is that GB is the better team even with all their injuries than Pitt. And it was the good things that GB did that made them the winners. Moreso than mistakes that Pitt did.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
14 years ago
the article mentions about the steelers doing that FG ... as if that made all the difference in the game - ya sure it sucks that he missed; but they still lost by 6 and even if they punted ... what are the chances we would of been pinned near our GL (could of easily been a touchback also).

There were alot more things then just that FG that cost the steelers the game. Penalties, bad throws, that fumble ...

I do agree with ryan clark in that; that would be a huge let down to go to the game and not win it. But oh well - not like they dont get paid ...
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
I find it at times humorous and other times annoying when teams point to 3=4 things and say "if we only did those things right, we would have won." They ignore the fact that the other team has those same kind of incidents that they overcame. They ignore the fact that if those "wrongs" were corrected something else could have happened.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago

the article mentions about the steelers doing that FG ... as if that made all the difference in the game - ya sure it sucks that he missed; but they still lost by 6 and even if they punted ... what are the chances we would of been pinned near our GL (could of easily been a touchback also).

There were alot more things then just that FG that cost the steelers the game. Penalties, bad throws, that fumble ...

I do agree with ryan clark in that; that would be a huge let down to go to the game and not win it. But oh well - not like they dont get paid ...

"Dulak" wrote:



Yeah, some people have put too much emphasis on that missed field goal. I think it's because people love to second-guess coaches, and this was their best opportunity to do that. Fact is, a 52-yard field goal attempt in a dome is nothing unusual. That kicker was booming his kickoffs all night long, and it was reasonable to think he would make it and cut the deficit to one point. The Packers failed to score after the missed field goal anyway.
blank
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Agreed, Greg. People tend to equate failure with a poor decision, which is often a false equivalence (just as people equate success with the correct decision, even when it wasn't necessarily so).

In retrospect, I'm conflicted on this particular play. During the game I was actually advocating for the Steelers to go for it, not because I wanted them to fail, but because I thought, given the Packers' seasonlong defensive weakness in 3rd- and 4th-and-long situations, it was a risk that might pay off. (Similarly, I wanted the Packers to go for it on 4th-and-goal inside the 10, since had they failed in the touchdown attempt, the Steelers would have been pinned very deep in their own territory.) Gregg Easterbrook derides the decision to kick the field goal in in this week's column, pointing out that the Steelers had been averaging 6 yards per offensive play the entire game. On the other hand, it was a 4th-and-15 play, so that 6-yard average would not have cut it. Also, Suisham hadn't made a field goal over 48 yards all season.

Overall, I would say the Steelers were in a difficult situation and had no truly good choices, and therefore, I believe they made the better of the two choices. The fact that it didn't work out for them doesn't impact my assessment.
UserPostedImage
Greg C.
14 years ago
Going for it on 4th and 15? Wow. These sportswriters sure get wacky sometimes.

You don't do that till the final possession of the game. It was either punt or field goal attempt.
blank
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
Zero2Cool (3h) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
wpr (3h) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
wpr (3h) : now 3
Zero2Cool (4h) : Who? What?
beast (13h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (17h) : meh
Zero2Cool (21h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (21h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (21h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.