peteralan71
13 years ago
My apologies if this has already been posted. Pretty good article from NFL.com.

Original Article 

This week we will feature six matchups from the Super Bowl.



Steelers vs. Packers: Ben Roethlisberger vs. Tramon Williams
Roethlisberger is one of the tougher quarterbacks to defend due to his ability to move around and throw from unsettled positions. Williams has very good quickness and does a great job breaking on the ball, but he must remain patient against the improvisational Roethlisberger. In his last game against the Packers in 2009, Big Ben had 503 passing yards and three touchdowns. He has a very easy throwing motion, good arm strength and is just as adept going deep as he is checking it down. His favorite long-distance threat is Mike Wallace, but the Packers might have Sam Shields cover him, because he has better speed than Williams. Antonio Brown has become Roethlisberger's go-to target in the playoffs, and Williams must beware of the rookie.

Williams is a great story. He didn't play football his freshman year at Louisiana Tech before deciding to walk-on during his sophomore season. He was an undrafted free agent who was waived by Houston and landed on Green Bay's practice squad in 2006. Now, he is one of the better corners in the league. He has three playoff interceptions to go along with his six regular-season picks. Williams allowed only 40 completions on 92 targets during the regular season. Those are all incredible numbers. He will have to keep up that production in the Super Bowl for the Packers to be successful.



Troy Polamalu vs. Aaron Rodgers
Rodgers is a talented scrambler and is not afraid to take off and run. He must keep an eye on Polamalu when he does leave the pocket, however, because the safety has very good transition quickness in space and exceptional range against the run and pass. If Rodgers can prevent Polamalu from making a game-changing play, the Packers could have the edge.

Rodgers has an uncanny ability to avoid pressure and Polamalu has a knack for getting home on the blitz, so this should be a premier showdown. Rodgers makes good decisions and has an outstanding arm. He also does a great job of keeping all the receivers involved. That could be important against Polamalu, who aligns all over the field and looks to get into a position to make contact on the receiver and force a turnover.



Doug Legursky vs. Ryan Pickett
Pickett does not get knocked back and has very good lower-body strength and quickness. He can beat single blocks and holds the line on double teams. Pickett is an outstanding two-down defender, and if he is able to dominate Legursky, it could keep Pittsburgh from controlling the clock, like the Steelers would prefer to do. For his part, Legursky has good athleticism and instincts. While this is a tough matchup, he is the type of player Pittsburgh often has success plugging into the lineup.

To stop Pittsburgh, you need to stop the run. Pickett is the key to doing that for Green Bay. Primarily a run-stuffer, he goes out in obvious passing situations. He is a point-of-attack player and shows natural strength and power when he pushes back offensive linemen. Legursky could start for ailing center Maurkice Pouncey and will be tested. Legursky does not have very long arms, but is blessed with great strength, which will come in handy against Pickett.



Ike Taylor vs. Greg Jennings
Jennings was targeted 126 times and had 74 receptions with only four drops this season. The Steelers will probably try to take him out of the game with coverage schemes and by having Taylor jam him at the line. If Jennings is able to break off a few big plays, it would give Green Bay a major boost.

Jennings has been one of the league's best big-play receivers over the past three years and is among the NFL leaders in yards per catch, receptions over 40 yards and touchdowns during that span. He is not only outstanding at getting open deep, but also picks up a ton of yards after the catch. The powerful runner builds speed as he goes and does not go down with an arm tackle. Jennings does a great job of catching the ball and keeping his feet moving at the same time. Taylor should be able to stay with him relatively well in the open field, however, as he is very athletic and a solid tackler. Taylor excels playing the trail technique, and is equally proficient turning and running with the receiver.



LaMarr Woodley vs. Bryan Bulaga
Bulaga was drafted to play left tackle, but injuries forced him to the right side, where he started 14 games. He is a nasty player with pop and power. He also has good feet, but will be seriously challenged by Woodley. While James Harrison receives more attention, Woodley is an incredibly productive player. He is the quickest player in NFL history to reach 10 playoff sacks (six games) and is also the only player to ever have a sack in six consecutive postseason games. He is very physical and loves to come inside on stunts.

Bulaga has struggled at times as a rookie. He was called for nine penalties during the regular season (three holding, six false starts) and allowed 11 sacks. If he doesn't have one of his better games, Woodley is more than capable of dominating him. Woodley has a very powerful build and closes hard to the ball. Bulaga has to hold his own or the Packers could be in trouble.



Rashard Mendenhall vs. A.J. Hawk and Desmond Bishop
Hawk and Bishop are both very strong and excel as tacklers. They'll need to against the powerful Mendenhall, who has a strong upper body and good leg drive after contact. Hawk, in particular, is at his best when he can flow to the ball, and he is well-equipped to contend with Mendenhall in space. Bishop, on the other hand, needs to step up and stop Mendenhall in the hole before he can get started. Mendenhall tends to be very streaky, and it is up to Hawk and Bishop to prevent him from finding a rhythm.

Who are they:

A pair of players out of the Mid-American Conference (MAC) who played quarterback in high school could have a huge impact in this game.

Green Bay's James Starks out of the University at Buffalo has really emerged in the playoffs and is a pick-and-slide runner with ability to find the hole.

Pittsburgh's Antonio Brown out of Central Michigan has good speed and great hands. He is also dangerous as a return man.



He got the Legursky vs. Pickett wrong, as Legursky will be going against Raji. Still, I like our odds with this matchup.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago
Well I discount it quickly with the Doug Legursky vs. Ryan Pickett match up.. if the author can't do a better job lining up the correct match ups.. then why bother. Disappointing.

Find out it is Gil Brandt.. even more disappointed. Sure Pickett with get some face time vs the Center.. but hardly the key line match up.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
peteralan71
13 years ago
I have never heard of the author, therefore I have no idea what he is really like. But like I said above, he got a glaringly obvious piece of this article wrong, so that makes me shake my head a little. Looking at the rest of the article, I agree with a lot of the things he says. It does certainly seem like he is very biased toward the Packers, given that he said we would win or were even in all areas with the exception of Bulaga and Woodley.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago

But like I said above, he got a glaringly obvious piece of this article wrong, so that makes me shake my head a little. Looking at the rest of the article,

"peteralan71" wrote:



Sorry.. but I didn't see that in this thread.. but now I see it in the nearly identical thread you also started. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
peteralan71
13 years ago
Oh shit it posted twice haha..... oops.

Edit: boom. Fixed.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
13 years ago
I see raji dominating the center; and commanding double teams - no matter if they have the replacement in or pouncey. Heck might even be better with pouncey in since he will be weak on that left foot.

I always thought bishop was better at the run then barnett; perhaps it was destiny that barnett went out and bishop had to come in.
Hawk has been pretty good of late also.

I see us doing a better job vs the run then the jets did (their 1st 1/2) ...

be curious to see how bulaga does on woodley thou - least well have a rb back there to block also.
peteralan71
13 years ago
I remember Bishop coming in 2 years ago and the guy flat out hits, and he doesn't really miss tackles. I thought at the time that he wouldn't be in GB for long, because somebody else would pick him up. Thank God nobody did. He has played a great role in this year's success.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
13 years ago
Bishop was never exposed for someone to pick up.. personally I was on the bandwagon of Bishop long before Barnett went down. I think he brings more to the field than Barnett or Hawk in the box.

I like the duo of Hawk and Bishop together.. they seem to work well together and I think Hawk is able to be a little more instinctive than in the past.. like he is comfortable out there for the first time in a while.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
peteralan71
13 years ago

Bishop was never exposed for someone to pick up

"Pack93z" wrote:



I was referring to trade, but yep I gotcha ;)

I agree that a big reason why Hawk is playing so well this year is because of the chemistry that he and Bishop have together. They are like Urlacher and Briggs. They feed off each other and make each other stronger.
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Bishop was never exposed for someone to pick up.. personally I was on the bandwagon of Bishop long before Barnett went down. I think he brings more to the field than Barnett or Hawk in the box.

I like the duo of Hawk and Bishop together.. they seem to work well together and I think Hawk is able to be a little more instinctive than in the past.. like he is comfortable out there for the first time in a while.

"Pack93z" wrote:




I thought for sure Bishop would be the odd man out on the 53 before the end of the trade deadline. At first he was hurt and my thinking was he'd heal up, behind close doors demand a trade and we'd get a draft pick for him.

I was freaking completely wrong.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (11h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (19h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3m / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

15h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

22h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.