Packers_Finland
14 years ago
Interesting...

Undercover MVPs: The Packers pass-protecting backs
January 21st, 2011 | Author: Sam Monson

Aaron Rodgers is on fire, we know that by now.

Josh Sitton is playing like an All-Pro guard, weve told you guys that enough already.

But as the Packers stand a game away from a return to the Super Bowl, its time some credit was given to a group of Green Bay players whose excellence this season has gone a long way to helping Rodgers and the passing game as much as anyone else has the running backs.

And while theyve done a decent job running the ball, its their pass-blocking that really sets them apart.



Green Bay is a team that likes to throw the ball, and with a quarterback like Rodgers, why not? They also spread teams out with as many receivers as they can get away with. The ability of the half backs and full backs in Green Bay to pass protect and pick up the blitz is of paramount importance, more than in other offenses around the league. Thats why the performance of a somewhat makeshift stable of backs in that regard is so impressive. Pass protection for backs is supposed to be the hardest part of the gig at the NFL level. The actual running the ball part is comparatively easy.

Aaron Rodgers dropped back to pass on 538 occasions in 2010, and (leaving out Ryan Grant and Dimitri Nance, who barely played), the Packers had five backs that combined for 320 snaps in pass protection. That in itself is not an impressive figure, but those backs combined to account for just two sacks, and three further pressures on the quarterback.

Their blocking grades:

Brandon Jackson (+3.5)
John Kuhn (+3.4)
Korey Hall (+2.6)
Quinn Johnson (+1.3)
James Starks (+0.8)

How impressive is that? Consider that of the 78 halfbacks/fullbacks to play 25 percent or more of snaps this year, less than half of them graded positively as blockers. And yet all five Green Bay backs managed to do it.

No one back allowed more than a single sack (Brandon Jackson and Korey Hall both gave up one), and no back totaled more than three total pressures conceded (Brandon Jackson gave up a sack and a pair of additional pressures, but from the greatest number of snaps pass protecting 114).

Lets put that into some meaningful numbers for you. The Green Bay backs gave up pressure on just 1.6% of plays they were pass protecting for in 2010. They surrendered pressure once every 63.2 snaps in pass protection. They averaged just under 20 snaps per game in pass protection over the season (19.75), meaning they combined to average more than three games between giving up pressure. Weve seen games where backs have given up multiple sacks in a single game, and the Packers have a stable of backs unknown to many who have gone the season averaging more than three games between giving up any recordable pressure.

The good news continues into the postseason. Four backs have combined for 43 snaps in pass protection, and they have yet to surrender a single pressure on the quarterback.

Aaron Rodgers will be getting all the headlines in this game, but take a moment of your time to watch the performance of his backs helping to protect him.

Itll be worth it.

"Profootballfocus" wrote:


This is a placeholder
14 years ago
B J Raji
blank
Rockmolder
14 years ago
It's something that, I think, most of us knew about, but something we take for granted.

I've heared people say "I want a runner, if we want to block, we'll put another FB in", but a running back who can block gives you so much versatility and it's such a help in the passing game.
Dulak
14 years ago

It's something that, I think, most of us knew about, but something we take for granted.

I've heared people say "I want a runner, if we want to block, we'll put another FB in", but a running back who can block gives you so much versatility and it's such a help in the passing game.

"Rockmolder" wrote:



<<< This +1 (wtf I wrote "T.h.i.s. +.1.") and it wrote the word slapnuts down?)
wpr
  • wpr
  • Preferred Member
14 years ago
The backs have done an excellent job of helping out. I wonder how many times they had a TE in the backfield as well? Just wondering.
UserPostedImage
peteralan71
14 years ago

It's something that, I think, most of us knew about, but something we take for granted.

I've heared people say "I want a runner, if we want to block, we'll put another FB in", but a running back who can block gives you so much versatility and it's such a help in the passing game.

"Dulak" wrote:



<<< This Slapnuts (wtf I wrote "T.h.i.s. +.1.") and it wrote the word slapnuts down?)

"Rockmolder" wrote:



What you must do, Dulak, is embrace the SLAPNUTS!
Green Bay: Home of the Green & Gold. And the hunter orange. And the camouflage.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : Who? What?
beast (9h) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
Martha Careful (14h) : meh
Zero2Cool (18h) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
Zero2Cool (18h) : It's so awesome.
Zero2Cool (18h) : new site fan shout post fast
wpr (21h) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
wpr (21h) : Only 4
wpr (21h) : Only 4
Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024
Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.
dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move
dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.
dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation
Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife
Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately
Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.
dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.
Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

16-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

30-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

29-Mar / Random Babble / wpr

28-Mar / Random Babble / Martha Careful

26-Mar / Random Babble / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.