Zero2Cool
13 years ago

Contract extension for Green Bay Packers Desmond Bishop muddles future for A.J. Hawk and Nick Barnett 

The Green Bay Packers solved one of their linebacker issues on Tuesday by signing Desmond Bishop to a contract extension.

But the question now is what happens to the rest of the insider linebackers.

Bishops four-year, $19 million contract extension, which was confirmed by an NFL source but not announced by the team, should ensure that he will be a starter next season. What that means for Nick Barnett and A.J. Hawk is unknown, but it could mean one or both wont be back with the team next season.

Bishop moved into a starting role in Week 5 after Barnett sustained a season-ending wrist injury. The fourth-year pro, who previously hadnt played a regular role on defense, flourished as a starter. He finished the regular season second on the team in tackles with 121 and had three sacks to earn the first significant pay day of his pro career.

He had been playing under the contract he signed as a rookie in 2007, when he was a sixth-round pick. That deal contained a signing bonus of just $439,800 and minimum base salaries. He didnt even reach the fourth-year escalator that would have increased his pay for 2010 to the low restricted free agent tender of $1.101 million because he didnt meet the playing-time minimums, so his base for this season remained at $550,000.

Its unclear how his new deal is structured, but now the 26-year-old is under contract through the 2014 season.

With Bishop expected to keep his starting job, the Packers will have to decide whether to go with Barnett, Hawk or someone else at the other inside spot. Barnett has a base salary of $5.5 million next season plus roster and workout bonuses that total $550,000. He will turn 30 this offseason and has finished two of the last three seasons on injured reserve.

Hawks role also expanded this season after injuries to Barnett and Brandon Chillar. The former No. 5 overall draft pick became the defensive signal caller and has had one of the better seasons of his five-year career. At age 26 (he will be 27 on Sunday), hes younger than Barnett and hasnt missed a game in his pro career.

But Hawk almost certainly will have to redo his contract in order to return. The final year of his contract calls for his base salary of $10 million to become guaranteed on the first day of the 2011 league year. The exact date of that is unknown because there is not currently a collective bargaining agreement in place for next season but whenever that date is, theres almost no chance the Packers will want to guarantee Hawk that kind of money.

Its unclear whether Hawk would be willing to return at a reduced salary or would rather play for another team.


UserPostedImage
bozz_2006
13 years ago
You know, I wouldn't even be surprised if Hawk does play next season under his current contract. I think he most definitely stays though, whether he restructures (meaning a contract extension with less than $10M) before next season or not.
UserPostedImage
13 years ago
Barnett is too small for the 3-4. His body has taken a toll.

The politics of it is he was a Sherman pick and not Thompson's.
blank
Tezzy
13 years ago
I see nothing muddled at all. Hawk and Bishop are playing extremely well together. I have no problems spending that money on Hawk, the return on investment will be better than keeping Barnett instead. Or at least that is how I see it.
On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."
longtimefan
13 years ago



The politics of it is he was a Sherman pick and not Thompson's.

"CaliforniaCheez" wrote:



But didnt Ted Thompson re-do his deal? So I think that point is not valid
shanks2122
13 years ago
What if (and i hate what ifs) they moved hawk or barnett outside, is that plausable? And would or could it work?
blank
13 years ago
I like the idea of putting Hawk outside simply because it would be harder for offenses to locate Matthews. :lol: He'd be a CM3 decoy with those locks of his.

On a serious note, I do think we keep both Hawk and Barnett unless we can't restructure Hawk's deal. Barnett has far more value to us than anything we could get from a trade at this point, and his wrist injury shouldn't slow him down next season.
UserPostedImage
digsthepack
13 years ago
Hawk is a middle linebacker and lacks the burst to play outside. I like the way he plays together with Bishop, and would view Barnett as more of an OLB of the two. Barnett may be trade bate for someone looking for a sideline to sideline MLB.

Yes....TT did resign Barnett as my memory serves me. Time to get past the Ted Thompson hating because he got rid of the aging egomaniac known as #4. For shame, Ted Thompson has built a deep roster able to withstand the worse personnel loss in recent NFL history, and brought in guys off the street that played and contributed immediately in Walden and Green.
State Motto: "Wisconsin, our serial murderers eat their kill!"
zombieslayer
13 years ago
I'm hoping we can figure out a way to keep both. Hawk led the team in combined tackles (including assists, Woodson led the team in solo tackles). The other thing about Hawk is he doesn't miss games. Salary aside, Mike McCarthy looks at availability very highly. That could be bad for Barnett but good for Hawk. You want guys who will be there in the Playoffs.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
kobe16
13 years ago
I with you guys I hope we can find a way to keep both of them. A.J. has played well this season and i think we would of only been better with Nick out there before he got hurt.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (1h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (2h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (2h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (3h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (12h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (12h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (12h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (16h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
beast (21-Dec) : So far the college playoffs have sucked... One team absolutely dominates the other
beast (21-Dec) : Well even if you weren't positive towards a guy, you wouldn't nessarily want to tell the media that (if they don't know about it)
Martha Careful (21-Dec) : I think MLF want Love to look past the end half issues, and feel good about his play. Our coaches generally keep a very positive tone.
beast (21-Dec) : I think a great running game will do that for most QBs
packerfanoutwest (21-Dec) : Coach Matt LaFleur has said quarterback Jordan Love is playing the best football of his career.
beast (21-Dec) : Oh, that's how you keep beating buckeye, with cheating
Zero2Cool (20-Dec) : There is a rule that if your name starts with 'b' you lose 15 points. Hey, I don't make the rules, I just enforce them!
wpr (20-Dec) : and then there is Beast. Running away with it all.
beast (20-Dec) : As of tonight, 3 way tie for 2nd in Pick'em, that battle is interesting!
beast (20-Dec) : Lions vs Vikings could be the main last game as it could determine division winners or #1 vs #2 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Or if KC needs to win for the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : Right now it looks like the only prime worthy games are Det-Minny and KC-Denver (if Denver can clinch a wild card spot)
Mucky Tundra (20-Dec) : The entirety of week 18 being listed as flex is weird
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Matt LaFleur today says unequivocally "Ted Thompson had nothing to do with the drafting of Jordan Love."
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Apparently, the editing is what pieces comments together. That Ted thing ... fake news.
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : LaFleur "opportunity that Ted Thompson thought was too good to pass up"
Zero2Cool (19-Dec) : Jordan Love pick was Ted Thompson's idea.
Mucky Tundra (19-Dec) : Kyle Shanahan on signing De'Vondre Campbell as a FA last offseason: “We obviously made a mistake.”
packerfanoutwest (19-Dec) : Alexander’s last season with GB
Martha Careful (18-Dec) : if I were a professional athlete, I would probably look to see who the agent is for Kirk Cousins and then use him
beast (18-Dec) : $100 million fully guaranteed Kirk Cousins gets benched for rookie
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : a lower case b
Mucky Tundra (18-Dec) : The real lie is how beast capitalized his name in his message while it's normally spelled with
packerfanoutwest (18-Dec) : haha that's a lie
beast (17-Dec) : Despite what lies other might tell, Beast didn't hate the Winter Warnings, it felt refreshing to Beast for some reason.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : whiteout uniforms in general are pretty lame and weak. NFL greed at it's worst
Martha Careful (17-Dec) : The Viking uniforms, the whiteout uniforms specifically absolutely suck
beast (17-Dec) : Thanks Zero2Cool, looks a lot better now
beast (17-Dec) : Seems like someone has a crush on me, can't stop talking about me
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : Should be gooder now. The forum default theme went to goofy land.
Zero2Cool (17-Dec) : What the hell
packerfanoutwest (17-Dec) : yeah beast hates the Winter Warning Unies
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Okay I'm glad to know it's not just something happening to me lol
Mucky Tundra (16-Dec) : Zero, did you copy the Packers uniforms from last night and white out the board?
beast (16-Dec) : Oh crap, is the board going to the Winter Warning Uniforms too?!? It's all white on white right now!
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 12:00 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.