Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
Bringing it back..


Packers' blitz-savvy Rodgers will be a challenge for Eagles

By Paul Domowitch
Philadelphia Daily News

Daily News Sports Columnist
ROCK, MEET hard place. Sean McDermott, meet Aaron Rodgers.
 

Actually, the Eagles' defensive coordinator already is very familiar with Rodgers. McDermott saw the Packers quarterback up close and personal in Week 1 and has seen him in his nightmares the last few days since learning the identity of the Eagles' first-round playoff opponent.

I mean, where are Stephen McGee, Alex Smith and Shaun Hill when you really need them?

McDermott's unit actually did a very good job against Rodgers in Week 1, holding him to some pretty pedestrian numbers in a 27-20 Eagles loss.

His 73.1 passer rating was his second lowest of the season, if you don't include his early exit against Detroit last month with a concussion. It was one of only three games in which he threw multiple interceptions. Had his third-lowest yards-per-attempt average (6.06) and fourth-lowest completion percentage (.613).

But that was Week 1, when McDermott had a deep, fresh supply of defensive linemen and a healthy secondary and linebacking corps with which to attack Rodgers.

Now, nearly 4 months later, he has neither. The Eagles have a puny 15 sacks in their last eight games. A defensive line that registered 19 sacks and 53 quarterback hurries in the first eight games has only 12 and 29 in the last eight. The go-to sacker, right end Trent Cole, has been shut out in five of his last seven starts. Right end Juqua Parker is playing way too many snaps and has only two sacks and one hurry in his last seven starts.

McDermott's season-opening starting right corner (Ellis Hobbs), free safety (Nate Allen) and middle linebacker (Stewart Bradley) all are on the shelf with injuries. His other starting corner, Asante Samuel, is playing on one good leg.

McDermott knows he must find a way to pressure Rodgers on Sunday or he'll pick his defense apart. But how?

He can't count on his front four to get in Rodgers' face, and blitzing him has been a losing proposition for just about every team that has tried it.

Rodgers has a league-best 107.4 passer rating against the blitz this season. Defenses have sent extra rushers after him on 166 dropbacks. He has completed 66.5 percent of his passes, thrown 11 touchdowns and four interceptions and been sacked only eight times against the blitz.

By comparison, the Eagles' Michael Vick has a 55 percent completion rate against the blitz and has been sacked 19 times, which is the second most in the league to the Bears' Jay Cutler.

"Rodgers is terrific at the line of scrimmage," said NFL Films senior producer Greg Cosell, supervising producer of ESPN's "NFL Matchup" show. "He's right up there with [Tom] Brady and [Drew] Brees and [Peyton] Manning as far as presnap recognition and being able to check protections and move [running] backs.

"The Packers attack against the blitz. They've got four quality wideouts. They go vertical very often. [Rodgers] will set the protection and know that it's one-on-one on the outside, and they attack.

"The other thing that helps him against the blitz is that he's got the quickest, most compact delivery in the league."

The Eagles are 21st in the league in points allowed this season. They've given up 377 points, which is the second most by the club in the last 23 years (they allowed 388 in 2005).

McDermott, 36, has taken a lot of heat for his unit's poor play. That probably would have been the case anyway, but the fact he is following one of the best defensive coordinators in the history of the game hasn't helped.

Every time something goes wrong, every time the Eagles give up another third-and-long completion or another red-zone touchdown, people openly wonder, WWJD? What Would Jim Do?

Truth is, probably not much that McDermott isn't doing. Johnson seldom had to rely on as many newbies at key positions as McDermott is right now. You can draw up the most clever blitzes in the world, but if you don't have the players capable of executing them, it doesn't mean a thing.

"I come from Jim Johnson's system," McDermott said last week. "With so many new players, you can't just say, 'Hey, we've always run this blitz, [run] this blitz,' because those players don't know those blitzes. There's a period of acclimation that comes into play, so you want to get the players as comfortable as possible.

"And the execution, it's great to come up with all of these different schemes and everything. But what can these players execute? A lot of these players are in their first games in the NFL. If you had veteran players, you can bank on them being comfortable in an NFL game, and then they can execute whatever you draw up.

"That's part of the overall equation you take into the game plan, and say, 'OK, realistically, what can I expect these guys to handle?' "

Asked that very question Sunday after the Eagles' meaningless loss to the Cowboys, McDermott backed off his earlier comments a bit.

"Anything I bring to the table, they're ready and willing to learn and execute," he said. "This week, we're going to have a couple of things in."

McDermott found himself in a very similar blitz-or-don't-blitz dilemma going into the playoffs last year. His unit had only 17 sacks in the last eight games of 2009. Unable to count on his front four to get pressure on the Cowboys' Tony Romo, he tried to attack him with a heavy dose of blitzes in their playoff meeting. Romo made mincemeat of those blitzes, completing 23 of 35 passes for 244 yards, two TDs and no interceptions.

"It's a balancing act," strong safety Quintin Mikell said. "You don't want to go out there and overblitz, because it's not very smart. At the same time, you can't let a quarterback, especially one as good as Aaron Rodgers, have all day.

"As a secondary, we have to make Sean comfortable with [blitzing]. That means we have to put in the work and do the little things right so that he feels we're ready to go. When he does call our number, if we have a blitz on, you've got to get there. And if we have to cover for an extra half a second, you gotta do it. At the end of the day, we've got to make it easier on [McDermott]."

And harder on Aaron Rodgers. *


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago


Considering  this is the playoffs and the Eagles are going against a formidable Green Bay Packers team that beat them in the season opener, will Vick have to be at 97.892 percent efficiency or can he get by at 87.4 percent.

The truth is that we're not going to find out until Sunday when the Packers unleash a defense that is ranked fifth overall in the NFL.

Led by defensive player-of-the-year favorite Clay Matthews with 13 1/2 sacks, the Packers are tied for second behind the Steelers in bringing down quarterbacks.

"Those guys fly around the ball and are always in good position," Vick said of the Packers' defense. "You just have to be ready for what they're going to do. They give you a lot of different looks and try to confuse you."


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Pack93z
  • Pack93z
  • Select Member Topic Starter
13 years ago
This bodes well.. combine this with their secondary issues.. advantage Packers.

I might have to break my vow and throw some coin on this game. ;)

MAYBE MICHAEL VICK was just trying to project confidence yesterday. 

What came across was closer to cluelessness. It was hard to leave Vick's brief session with reporters at NovaCare feeling like the Eagles' quarterback understands and appreciates the adjustments defenses have made over his last half-dozen games, or that he plans to do anything differently.

Michael Vick believes the Eagles offense should stay the course for Sundays playoff game against Green Bay.

"I don't think we have to make changes," said Vick, who threw no interceptions in his first seven appearances this year, then threw six in his last five. His passer rating was over 100 in four of his first six games, but only once in his final six.

"I don't have to do nuttin'. I'm still going to be me. I'm still going to play my game, still play with confidence, still try to rally the guys around me, and make sure they're focused and in tune with what we're doing, what we're trying to accomplish," Vick said. "That's what's important. You can't change your game around this time of the season . . . You just go out and play your best football. It's the playoffs."

Asked about the fact that the offense's best work lately came in the final 8 minutes of the Giants game, in which it was otherwise ineffective, Vick said: "As long as you find a way to win at some point, that's all that matters. It doesn't matter what happened in three quarters. If you pull it out and you win, enough said."

There is a grain of truth there - offensive coordinator Marty Mornhinweg said yesterday that blitzing Vick the way teams have been doing lately is high-risk, that the Eagles feel they will hit a big play eventually. But it's also true that Vick needs to work on getting the ball out quicker, and on securing it better against defenders he no longer is catching flatfooted. Minnesota's Antoine Winfield, who picked Vick's pocket for a touchdown a week ago tonight, said afterward he'd noticed on tape that Vick always spins when facing pressure off the corner. Winfield waited for the spin and knocked the ball away.

Vick conceded that "a couple games, we didn't get the ball out, I didn't get the ball out as quick as I wanted to, waiting on the downfield throws. That's why you play the game, you play the game to learn and get better, and that's what I'm doing."

Vick said getting to sit out Sunday's loss to the Cowboys helped his bruised quad. Asked if he is 100 percent, he said: "I'm getting there."

In the season opener, Vick relieved Kevin Kolb against the Packers and ran 11 times for 103 yards, while completing 16 of 24 passes for 175 yards, a touchdown and a 101.9 passer rating. But Green Bay had prepared for Vick as a second-and-long Wildcat gimmick, not an every-down threat. The Packers will benefit from that experience, and from what teams such as the Vikings, Giants and Bears have done.

What we don't know is how much Vick will benefit from that.


"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
13 years ago
My uncle won $500 on the rose bowl
UserPostedImage
4PackGirl
13 years ago
if their blitz isn't good - this is gonna be a REAL interesting game. i could see rodgers puttin up some serious numbers - IF the guys can catch the balls. 😉
Nonstopdrivel
13 years ago
He's the highest-rated quarterback in the league against the blitz? Higher than Tom Brady and Peyton Manning? I guess that goes to show what a lot of us have been saying for quite a while: one of the reasons why those guys are so damn good is they hardly ever get hit. I wish we could put them in a situation like Aaron Rodgers has had to endure and see how good they were. Rodgers has excelled despite almost unprecedented adversity (only David Carr has been sacked more in one season, if I recall correctly, and we all know what that did to him). The other two have been essentially the privileged pretty boys of the league.

I can't wait to see the Packers go toe-to-toe with the league greats and finally bring them down, instead of being oh, so close.
UserPostedImage
13 years ago
His intelligence, mobility, and quick release are probably unmatched in the NFL. I don't think Manning has his mobility. Brady is shifty in the pocket but his release is slower.
UserPostedImage
Dulak
13 years ago

My uncle won $500 on the rose bowl

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



should of/could of put money 2 weeks ago on the pack at 34-1 odds ... they are 15-1 for them winning the SB and just made a 'prediction' ... figured 15-1 isnt too bad considering they are one of the best times in the playoffs.
zombieslayer
13 years ago

He's the highest-rated quarterback in the league against the blitz? Higher than Tom Brady and Peyton Manning? I guess that goes to show what a lot of us have been saying for quite a while: one of the reasons why those guys are so damn good is they hardly ever get hit. I wish we could put them in a situation like Aaron Rodgers has had to endure and see how good they were. Rodgers has excelled despite almost unprecedented adversity (only David Carr has been sacked more in one season, if I recall correctly, and we all know what that did to him). The other two have been essentially the privileged pretty boys of the league.

I can't wait to see the Packers go toe-to-toe with the league greats and finally bring them down, instead of being oh, so close.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Oh wow. I've been saying this for years about P Manning. Put him behind our OL of 2009 and see how good he is.

Rodgers has a league-best 107.4 passer rating against the blitz this season. Defenses have sent extra rushers after him on 166 dropbacks. He has completed 66.5 percent of his passes, thrown 11 touchdowns and four interceptions and been sacked only eight times against the blitz.



Wow. Rodgers has matured greatly this year. Maybe his numbers weren't as good as previous years (it would help if his WRs could CATCH the balls), but this is important.

I haven't watched much of the Eagles this year but know in the near past, they were a blitz happy team. Bring it! :thumbright:
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
flep
13 years ago
If the eagles don't blitz we need to be aware of coverage and take what' they give us.

But I cannot see them covering DD, GJ and jordy all game. And add to that Jones, Lee and Quarless at al and this looks good.

Don't forget A-rod can run as well.

I am starting to feel a lot better about this game.

Philly will have to try and scheme A-Rod out of the game by giving him totally new looks on D

But somehow I don't see that happening.
Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years
UserPostedImage


I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (7m) : Merry Christmas!
beast (8h) : Merry Christmas 🎄🎁
beast (16h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (21h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (23h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
8h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

19h / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.