They switch people around to get matchups yeah. Apparently all the WRs get covered by diffirent guys except for Driver (who is the only one who always gets covered by the best) according to you. You don't think Jones was covered by Jenkins at all last night?

The Cowboys may be struggling but they aren't retards. They can tell just as well as anyone else that Jones is more of a threat than Nelson is regardless of who starts. Haha you think they are sitting there going "oh Jordy Nelson started so he must be their 2nd best guy, I wish we would have watched some film on these players so we could know for sure"

Trying to make it seem like Driver always gets covered by good guys when he is the #2 while Jones just gets covered by scrubs when he is the #2 IS exaggerating, so yeah you did.

Driver is obviously more consistent than Jones is but you are blind if you don't see that Jones is more dangerous when he gets the ball.

---

Wow... your the one exaggerate shit to try to make your point stronger which is lame by your own words.

I never said Driver always gets covered by the best which is your exaggerate shit.

I never said the Cowboys were retarded ether (more of your exaggerate shit) ...

Coming into the Cowboys game Jordy had more catches than Jones and Jones had 0 catches in two of the three games before the Cowboys game.

And no I didn't exaggerate... Driver normally get covered by a better CB than Nelson or Jones. Just like the better WR on the other team normally get covered by Williams instead of Shields... usually it's just one higher on the chart....

and I never said scrubs so more of your exaggerate shit.... your giving a lot of exaggerate shit for someone who doesn't like it...


And I'm not blind... clearly Jones is more dangerous when he gets the ball... as he's lot more likely to fumble it... that is more dangerous to the Packers for sure... thanks for pointing that out...

---

Ok, I see what happened I misread your "IMO a big game against the cowboys or #3 CB" to say "IMO a big game against the cowboys #3" like you were saying Jones was only good because just lined up against Dallas' 3rd CB - my bad.

Though I am still not sure why you were arguing against a guy who simply said Jones is more dangerous than Driver when you admit you also believe Jones is more dangerous.

---

Because you two are using "dangerous" in very different ways. Stevetarded is using "dangerous" to mean that Jones can put more damage on the opposing defense than Driver can, whereas beast is saying that Jones is more dangerous to the Packers because he's more likely to turn the ball over.

---