Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I put in a waiver claim on Deion Branch. I'm waiver 9.
dhazer put a waiver in on three players. He's waiver 12.

He got one player on his first claim, then second claim got Deion Branch.

I thought being 9th, I'd have gotten him over anyone 10th or higher. Especially since he got someone in his first claim.

I have had issues with waiver for a few years now, (which is why I like the first come first serve but I'm alone on that).


Can anyone explain the waiver thing to me, because I'm obviously and idiot when working with it and dhazer is a freaking Genius at it. He's owned my ass a few times on this claiming people, lol.
UserPostedImage
doddpower
14 years ago
That's weird man. It certainly shouldn't work that way unless it was some kind of bug. FleaFlicker has a few of them that I've noticed. Hell, they still list Big Ben and S. Holmes as on suspension, and the IR system has some kinks as well.

But yeah, if Branch was his 2nd claim and he got his first and Branch was your first ahead of him, you absolutely should have gotten your pick.
Pack93z
14 years ago
I haven't noticed any issue with the waiver claims in a couple years of use.. however I have never nested them like Hazer is either.. wonder if there is some issue with the process as it resets your claim position after you are rewarded a claim.

If his first player was a unchallenged claim.. his second one would be reset to 1.. and depending on how they process the claim.. his position might be mistakenly been bumped ahead of your first claim.

Can't see the transaction history in that league.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
I dunno man. I think dhazer just owns my ass in fantasy football, lol. This happened a few times last year in Yahoo! but I thought I was going crazy, so I actually wrote my waiver position down and everything. He still got the guy.

It's just gotten really funny to see it happen again and again. I've decided to just not try to claim players from here on out unless I'm short on the position. I feel like David vs Goliath and the story was rewritten, hah.

My team is doing ok so maybe it's a good thing I didn't get the claims? πŸ™‚
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Your waiver claim position right now is 7 out of 12. (This means 6 teams can submit claims ahead of you. At worst, you'll get your 7th choice.)

Each time one of your claims is processed, your waiver claim position drops to 12 (to the end of the line).

You may submit as many claims as you want. Fleaflicker will attempt to process all of your claims.



WTF, I only have one player I'm going after! 7TH?
UserPostedImage
dhazer
14 years ago
Don't worry Zero you can beat my ass this week like DFoster did last week. I'll even start Fitzpatrick as my qb over Rodgers πŸ˜›
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be πŸ™‚ (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Don't worry Zero you can beat my ass this week like DFoster did last week. I'll even start Fitzpatrick as my qb over Rodgers :P

"dhazer" wrote:



Don't play it like you're doing me a favor. You're not starting Rodgers because A, you're pissed off at him and B, he's playing one of the best defenses in the league, lol.
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
LMAO, unreal, someone four seeds AFTER me got the guy, the ONLY one I was going for.

This is incredible. At first it was annoying, but now its happening every time, it's funny.

Next season, its going to be first come first serve. I'm done with this waiver order since no one can explain it to me and I fail to understand it. πŸ˜‰
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
14 years ago
OMG I claimed three bums and I got them all! :(


On a positive note, I scored enough points this past week to beat 10 teams, individually of course. BUT, as with my other two freaking losses, the team that scored the most in the league was my opponent.

dhazer beat me silly, slap me in the fast, and said 'bitch' and kicked me in the mouth. He had nearly 50! more points than me and I was the second highest scorer. Punk! πŸ˜›
UserPostedImage
dhazer
14 years ago
Whos your daddy πŸ™‚ hey I felt sorry for you and accepted the trade a week earlier than I said I would so shush :P


Also doesn't hurt Rivers gets a shitty pass defense this week lol
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be πŸ™‚ (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Houston getting dog walked by Baltimore
packerfanoutwest (7h) : Feliz Navidad!
Zero2Cool (11h) : Merry Christmas!
beast (20h) : Merry Christmas πŸŽ„πŸŽ
beast (24-Dec) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (24-Dec) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
9h / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

25-Dec / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

24-Dec / Random Babble / beast

24-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright Β© 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comβ„’. All Rights Reserved.