4PackGirl
16 years ago

I don't think anyone should be slamming dhazer. He gave his opinion and reasons why. How many others have the balls to put it on the line like that? So what, he was wrong. Atleast he put his balls out there for everyone to swing at.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Well, c'mon now. The kid repeatedly said (paraphrasing) "i hate rodgers, the colts are going to score 40 points, lol lol lol". He may have had some rationale, but he was talking some trash and, as usual, taking great glee at the prospect of us being beat soundly at home because he doesn't like our great young QB and GM.

Instead, we took it right to the Colts and Rodgers had a sparkling performance. Why can't we talk a little trash back? I'm not saying people should be bashing him or getting personal, but he talked a lot of game and I don't see any problem with people calling it out now that he's turned out to be wrong.

Dish it, take it.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



couldn't agree more! i'm not hatin on dh but to say it's not "enjoyable" would be an understatement. LOL. ๐Ÿ˜‰
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

I don't think anyone should be slamming dhazer. He gave his opinion and reasons why. How many others have the balls to put it on the line like that? So what, he was wrong. Atleast he put his balls out there for everyone to swing at.

"4PackGirl" wrote:




Well, c'mon now. The kid repeatedly said (paraphrasing) "i hate rodgers, the colts are going to score 40 points, lol lol lol". He may have had some rationale, but he was talking some trash and, as usual, taking great glee at the prospect of us being beat soundly at home because he doesn't like our great young QB and GM.

Instead, we took it right to the Colts and Rodgers had a sparkling performance. Why can't we talk a little trash back? I'm not saying people should be bashing him or getting personal, but he talked a lot of game and I don't see any problem with people calling it out now that he's turned out to be wrong.

Dish it, take it.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



couldn't agree more! i'm not hatin on dh but to say it's not "enjoyable" would be an understatement. LOL. ;)

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Look, I am not saying to NOT give the dude a hard time. I'm saying SLAMMING him personally is uncalled for. I know he doesn't like Rodgers and I know why he doesn't and I think its a stupid reason, but to him its not. Thus he hates the guy.

I'm all for giving him shit til his monitor screams UNCLE, but all I am saying is be respectful and understand he had the balls to atleast put his ass on the line. You don't HAVE to do this... its just a suggestion.
UserPostedImage
zombieslayer
16 years ago



Is that a bet zombie lol because if it is ill take it and to the poster saying the colts will be shut out needs to share what he or she is drinking lol. I see the colts putting up 40-50 points against us
Oh n/m i noticed it was raider that said that

"longtimefan" wrote:



We'll score points. I really believe that.

The question is - will it be enough to beat the Colts?

I hope so, because I really hate the Colts. I hate Peyton Manning, and hope Woody, Williams, and Collins all get INTs.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



you were close!!!

2 out of 3 isnt bad

"dhazer" wrote:



:lol:

OK. I got the people wrong on who got INTs. I just had a feeling that Woody would get an INT returned for a TD. Turns out I was wrong. Instead, it was Rouse and Collins who got INTs returned for TDs.

I also predicted around week 4 that Aaron Rodgers would have a better year than Peyton Manning. It's coming true so far.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡น ๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฒ ๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ท
longtimefan
16 years ago

I don't think anyone should be slamming dhazer. He gave his opinion and reasons why. How many others have the balls to put it on the line like that? So what, he was wrong. Atleast he put his balls out there for everyone to swing at.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:




Well, c'mon now. The kid repeatedly said (paraphrasing) "i hate rodgers, the colts are going to score 40 points, lol lol lol". He may have had some rationale, but he was talking some trash and, as usual, taking great glee at the prospect of us being beat soundly at home because he doesn't like our great young QB and GM.

Instead, we took it right to the Colts and Rodgers had a sparkling performance. Why can't we talk a little trash back? I'm not saying people should be bashing him or getting personal, but he talked a lot of game and I don't see any problem with people calling it out now that he's turned out to be wrong.

Dish it, take it.

"4PackGirl" wrote:



couldn't agree more! i'm not hatin on dh but to say it's not "enjoyable" would be an understatement. LOL. ;)

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Look, I am not saying to NOT give the dude a hard time. I'm saying SLAMMING him personally is uncalled for. I know he doesn't like Rodgers and I know why he doesn't and I think its a stupid reason, but to him its not. Thus he hates the guy.

I'm all for giving him shit til his monitor screams UNCLE, but all I am saying is be respectful and understand he had the balls to atleast put his ass on the line. You don't HAVE to do this... its just a suggestion.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



show us in THIS thread where he was slammed :thumbright:
Zero2Cool
16 years ago

show us in THIS thread where he was slammed :thumbright:

"longtimefan" wrote:



Keep in mind I have the POWAH to merge that thread with this one ๐Ÿ˜›
UserPostedImage
longtimefan
16 years ago

show us in THIS thread where he was slammed :thumbright:

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



Keep in mind I have the POWAH to merge that thread with this one :P

"longtimefan" wrote:



that is why I said THIS thread BEFORE you had a chance to merge it ;)

Besides that other thread got locked and rightfully so..

LOL
68md
16 years ago

I don't think anyone should be slamming dhazer. He gave his opinion and reasons why. How many others have the balls to put it on the line like that? So what, he was wrong. Atleast he put his balls out there for everyone to swing at.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:



So we gave him a bit of a hard time...I have a good relationship with DH..he speaks his mind...so should everyone else. He is admittedly a huge critic of Rodgers and Ted Thompson therefore he expects to get some :xcensoredx: back.
Oh and by the way he killed himself saying the colts play on grass now...trust me Z2C he will will pay us back with interest.
Pack93z
16 years ago

I already said i would praise Mike McCarthy and the kid for the rest of the year if the Pack would win. I'll put whatever you want as my siggy if grant gets over a 100 but if he dont you have to have a graham harrell siggy for yours.

"pack93z" wrote:



Sounds like a deal.. good luck. 100 on the ground it is.

"pack93z" wrote:



I will fashion something up today sometime.. hope you are around this week. He didn't make it by much.. but he made it. :lol:

"dhazer" wrote:



Here is your new siggy.. way to honor your bet DH.. man of your word.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Fan Shout
beast (2h) : Merry Christmas ๐ŸŽ„๐ŸŽ
beast (10h) : Sounds like no serious injuries from the Saints game and Jacobs and Watson should play in the Vikings game
packerfanoutwest (15h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (17h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (24-Dec) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (24-Dec) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (24-Dec) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (24-Dec) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (23-Dec) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (23-Dec) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (23-Dec) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (23-Dec) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23-Dec) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

6h / GameDay Threads / bboystyle

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

13h / Random Babble / beast

18h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

Headlines
Copyright ยฉ 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.comโ„ข. All Rights Reserved.