For me it comes down to value.
If Hawk is as pissed off with his lack of snaps as his agent claims then he may refuse to redo his contract in the offseason.
"all_about_da_packers" wrote:
I am not sure what you expect from Hawk seeing his snaps dwindle to zero; you expect him to be happy or even marginally content? If I was in his position, I'd clearly be as pissed as he is.
Hawk's agent also said that his preference would be to stay with the Packers, but if he is moved then he would welcome the chance to compete somewhere else.
We know that Desmond Bishop's contract expires, and that he has already rejected an extension the Packers offered him. Trading Hawk makes zero sense, considering Hawk is better overall than Bishop and has shown he is open to returning to Green Bay.
When exactly do you remember Ted trading away a player of some value to another team for something? He didn't even trade Kampman when it was plainly obvious Kampman was not thrilled at all with the move to 3-4.
Hawk is not going no where. And he should not, because he showed today that he can contribute quite a bit to our team.
"British" wrote: