Winners and Losers (Packers vs. Eagles)· Page 3

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#21

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:

That doesn't mean anything though.

You'd be smiling too if you got a chance to hug Gregorious.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Tezzy
Senior Member

14 years ago

#22

I second that on Jordy, great returns.
I'd put Raji on there too, he doubled his highest snap count and was still effective.
I could get chewed out for this one, but I think Shields gets a head nod too. First ever pro game after going undrafted, and I only saw him give up one medium throw.

"Mckennj3" wrote:

Did you miss Shields giving up the touchdown to Maclin?

On top of every beard grows a man.
"The Bears are shell-shocked... and it's breaking my heart."

Finley88Beast
Registered

14 years ago

#23

"Tezzy" wrote:

Did you miss Shields giving up the touchdown to Maclin?

"Mckennj3" wrote:

other than that Touchdown shields played pretty good for his first game never really saw that they picked on him to much thoe.

A Quote from my brother Mike(Bears Fan)
"Fucking Greg Jennings"
After he makes a catch

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#24

Agreed with Finley. Yes, Shields got burned for a TD and went the wrong direction, but other than that, he was decent. Which means pretty good for his first real NFL game.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#25

Every DB gets burned a time or two. I thought Shields held up and I was surprised he wasn't targeted more often.

Nonstopdrivel
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#26

You'd be smiling too if you got a chance to hug Gregorious.

"zombieslayer" wrote:

Or if I had a codpiece like Donald's.

Cheesey
Preferred Member

14 years ago

#27

Nelson was a bright spot for kick returns. 2 long ones made a huge difference in the game.
"Bing" Crosby hit both FG's solidly. And the 56 yarder would have been good from alot longer. And it was a clutch kick, last play of the half.
O-line stunk as far as protection.
Grant was burning it up....then that damn injury.
Clay was AMAZING out there.

If Vick would have run when they were down in the red zone, he probably could have walked it in. I'm GLAD he decided to throw! (I bet the Packers are, too!)

Packers_Finland
Registered

14 years ago

#28

Every DB gets burned a time or two. I thought Shields held up and I was surprised he wasn't targeted more often.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

I don't think he was targeted even once in the first half. But there were definitely 3 or 4 plays where his guy was open and Vick threw the ball to him in the second half.

This is a placeholder

BangTheDrum
Registered

14 years ago

#29

I could get chewed out for this one, but I think Shields gets a head nod too. First ever pro game after going undrafted, and I only saw him give up one medium throw.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:

You won't get chewed out by me - the touchdown to Maclin was a bit sad (looked like he was expecting some help that wasn't there, but hard to tell in live action), but otherwise I didn't see him much unless he was tackling (and he got a couple timely stops). With those receivers, that's a pretty good outcome.

"Mckennj3" wrote:

You didnt see him get burned by Maclin on that TD and randomly sprint in the first direction he thought of after he got turned around... awful play, looked completely clueless

Ba da da, Ba dadada GO PACK GO

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (22m) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.

dfosterf (2h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo

Zero2Cool (4h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha

wpr (4h) : Tomorrow is almost here.

packerfanoutwest (5h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?

packerfanoutwest (5h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him

Zero2Cool (6h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.

packerfanoutwest (17h) : don't care

Zero2Cool (22h) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?

packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat

wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.

wpr (22-Apr) : now 3

Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?

beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?

Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast

wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.

wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4

Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!

dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am

wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days

beast (18-Apr) : 6 days

wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24