Packers Start Cutting· Page 2

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

I'm not sure why people keep saying that Bush is good at special teams. I guess they think if people say it enough, it must be true. He once had two false starts on special teams in ONE game. How is that even possible?

"IronMan" wrote:

Jarrett Bush, doing the impossible since '06.

zombieslayer
Registered

14 years ago

#12

"IronMan" wrote:

Selective memory. I'll admit I'm guilty of it. I do remember him making some big plays but maybe forgot about the penalties. He did have a decent game against the Seahawks and that was late in the season so I remember it more clearly. But then again, yes, it was the Seahawks.

My man Donald Driver

(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷

go.pack.go.
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#13

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Jarrett Bush, doing the impossible since '06.

"IronMan" wrote:

Maybe THAT is why PackersHome was made...to protest against Jarrett Bush.

Zero2Cool
Elite Member

14 years ago

#14

"go.pack.go." wrote:

Jarrett Bush, doing the impossible since '06.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Maybe THAT is why PackersHome was made...to protest against Jarrett Bush.

"IronMan" wrote:

I dunno...

Dulak
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#15

"go.pack.go." wrote:

Jarrett Bush, doing the impossible since '06.

"Zero2Cool" wrote:

Maybe THAT is why PackersHome was made...to protest against Jarrett Bush.

"IronMan" wrote:

you know on the flip side of the coin - it was 'hilarious' (said with much hilarious gregarious boisterousness) ... when JB's job was in jeopardy last year. And the packers decide not to let another team take him (2 teams were closely looking at him or offered him money) but to offer him dbl the pay of the previous year.

I wish I could be the such a f$%% up at work and make dbl the pay the next year ...
only in the nfl 😉

all_about_da_packers
Senior Member

14 years ago

#16

He once had two false starts on special teams in ONE game. How is that even possible?

"IronMan" wrote:

Mind me asking what game that was?

It may have been an error by the ref (as in he misstated the penalty), or even called a 'False Start' in jest similar to Houchli's "False start, the entire offensive line" in one of our games last year.

The NFL: Where Greg Jennings Happens.

get_louder_at_lambeau
Registered

14 years ago

#17

"IronMan" wrote:

Um, because he is good at special teams? Duh. But yeah, he's a dumbass with the penalties.

Today at Minicamp-

PackersLive: Wow, Bush just made a phenomenal play on punt coverage keeping it out of the end zone so it was downed at the 1

That tweet came 14 minutes after this one-

PackersLive: Bush offsides on fg.

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/96799469.html

http://packersnews.net

Dulak
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#18

That tweet came 14 minutes after this one-

PackersLive: Bush offsides on fg.

"get_louder_at_lambeau" wrote:

http://www.jsonline.com/blogs/sports/96799469.html

ya that might result in a 1st down right? ... err I was going to say if its a coverage play not we doing the fg

IronMan
Veteran Member

14 years ago

#19

He once had two false starts on special teams in ONE game. How is that even possible?

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:

"IronMan" wrote:

Bengals game last year.

Both in 2nd qtr.

4-2-GB 18 (11:54) (Punt formation) PENALTY on GB-24-J.Bush, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at GB 18 - No Play.

4-20-GB 20 (8:42) (Punt formation) PENALTY on GB-24-J.Bush, False Start, 5 yards, enforced at GB 20 - No Play.

get_louder_at_lambeau
Registered

14 years ago

#20

He once had two false starts on special teams in ONE game. How is that even possible?

"IronMan" wrote:

"all_about_da_packers" wrote:

Bengals game last year.

"IronMan" wrote:

Evidence of Bush being a good special teamer can be found right at that link you provided. Take a look at the highlight of the punt return right after Bush's first false start. Big return for the Bengals, but Bush is the first one on the screen by the punt returner, and he's being double teamed like usual.

http://packersnews.net

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

packerfanoutwest (38m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath

packerfanoutwest (39m) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.

packerfanoutwest (51m) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed

Zero2Cool (3h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them

Zero2Cool (3h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?

bboystyle (3h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ahh, ok.

bboystyle (3h) : yes due to tie breaker

Zero2Cool (3h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.

Zero2Cool (3h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?

bboystyle (3h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference

Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network

beast (4h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th

beast (4h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly

Zero2Cool (5h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.

bboystyle (5h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed

Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv

Zero2Cool (5h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno

beast (5h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?

packerfanoutwest (6h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans

Zero2Cool (6h) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (6h) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (6h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (7h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (9h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (9h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (9h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (9h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (9h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (9h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (9h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (9h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (9h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (9h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (9h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (9h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (9h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (10h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (10h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (10h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (10h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS