Zero2Cool
14 years ago
What does ...
UserPostedImage

have to do with the Draft?
UserPostedImage
porky88
14 years ago
Campbell is Tony Mandarich 2.0 IMO. He's all flash. There is nothing that stands out on film. I would grab Bryant if I couldn't get a deal to move down in that scenario. His problem is not talent. It's character. That's what it comes down too. He's clearly immature based on some of the stuff reported and how he's reacted to it. So was Jermichael Finley. Maybe Green Bay would be good for him. Maybe not. That's the nature of the NFL draft.

For the record, I don't anticipate Green Bay going Bryant. I'm just pointing out a scenario in which it wouldn't be as far as a stretch as you guys think. That's the Campbell vs. Bryant situation.
dfosterf
14 years ago
That has to be absolutely the first time I have ever heard the criticism of a 314 pound lineman include the phrase, "He's all flash."

I wonder if he has a twitter account. I bet he'd appreciate it if you forwarded that to him, lol



Bryant: Some teams love him, some hate him 

I'm going with the evaluator from team 2 (hater) you can click above for the lover if you want.

Evaluator from Team 2:

"Dez's workout was a joke and just reinforced what I already thought about the kid.

He had his entourage with him the entire posse.

After all the (stuff) he's pulled so far, he needed to show some professionalism at his pro day and he failed to do that.

He didn't look like he had prepared much for the workout and he even forgot his shoes!

How do you forget your shoes when you are auditioning for millions of dollars?

He's even more stupid than I thought. He's a very immature kid and he's got bust written all over him even though he has great talent."

dhazer
14 years ago
Anyone think maybe Bryant wants to slip down the board so he will goto a decent team not a shitty team? Just thought I would throw that out there.
Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)
UserPostedImage
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
I've considered the same possibility myself. But I doubt he has the intelligence to be so foresighted. 😉 Besides, sliding down the boards will drastically reduce his paycheck.
UserPostedImage
porky88
14 years ago

That has to be absolutely the first time I have ever heard the criticism of a 314 pound lineman include the phrase, "He's all flash."

"dfosterf" wrote:



There has probably never been a workout from an offensive limeman like the one he gave at the Combine. In that context, he's all flash. However, on film, meh.... There is nothing about him on film the makes him a better prospect than say Charles Brown. He's a guy that looks the part, but doesn't play it well. Personally, that seems to be the consensus with him.
dfosterf
14 years ago

That has to be absolutely the first time I have ever heard the criticism of a 314 pound lineman include the phrase, "He's all flash."

"porky88" wrote:



There has probably never been a workout from an offensive limeman like the one he gave at the Combine. In that context, he's all flash. However, on film, meh.... There is nothing about him on film the makes him a better prospect than say Charles Brown. He's a guy that looks the part, but doesn't play it well. Personally, that seems to be the consensus with him.

"dfosterf" wrote:



You don't like Charles much either, as I recall. You gave a hypothetical regarding Campbell and Bryant, so I had to give an answer.

I give a lot more deference to Mike Mayock of NFLN than many fans, and he agrees with your "ranking" of Charles Brown and Bruce Campbell as "tied for 5th" in the rankings of offensive tackles. I think it especially important to pay close attention to Mayock as contrasted to some of the other draft gurus when talking about offensive tackles.

Why do I say that? It is my understanding that due to Mayock's affiliation with the NFL itself, he does have access to the same footage that the scouts and GM's are using...they have a word for that game film, it escapes me at the moment. (I want to say "the bundle", but that's probably wrong) It is extremely difficult to attempt to access offensive linemen based on the game film that we have as fans. I know, I have looked at just about everything findable on about 20 of them.

I'm going to assume that Russell Okung and Bryan Bulaga are long gone.

That leaves "my" other 4.

I have liked Trent Williams from the start of this process, have said so repeatedly, in the face of NO ONE else liking him. I still say he is the 3rd best prospect, would love to have him, (I see him as the "perfect" transitional player from RT to LT for our situation) Mayock now agrees with that assessment, at least as far as ranking...color him gone too.

Anthony Davis has been considered by many to be the most NFL ready LT in this draft, including Okung. Mayock has him as the 4th, after the combine, he had some slippage (work ethic stuff, mostly). I keep him at 4, and hold out the possibility that he will be there, but not holding my breath. I have been back and forth on Davis more than any of the others.

Charles Brown has also been called "most ready" as an NFL LT, with the proviso that he goes into a ZBS. He has seen slippage by many of the draft gurus, including Mayock. I think it has more to do with the excellent combine workouts turned in by both Campbell and Williams, contrasted with his relatively slow performance, from a guy that most probably thought would be the fastest. He does have good "film", imo, but again, "my" film isn't "the" film.

Then we get to Campbell. I personally take him over Brown. As I said, Mayock has him tied as the 5th best OT.



So, there we are. Precisely where I started February 11th, as far as the top 6. No one has moved into it, and no one has moved out of it. If Dez Bryant isn't taken by Miami at 12, I will not be one bit surprised to see him on the board at 23, hence this thread. Amazingly ironic that my guess is that Bryant and Campbell will be the big debate in Oakland's war room. (40 time of Campbell/Al Davis, etc.) It is not paranoia, and it is certainly not an easy decision for many if he was there. I just hope that Ted and co. value the so-called "intangibles" as much as I do.

I take any of the 6 over Dez, and it's not close. It gets dicey when you start talking about many of the other names that get bandied about at some other positions, but this is not one them.

I like his (Dez) falling to 23 if it would assist in getting Bellicheat to come off a couple 2nds (plus, imo) in trade so HE can take this MAJOR risk on this PERSON, as contrasted to the information regarding this PLAYER, dependent upon who else is there at 23. Those 2nd round picks look extremely valuable to me.

If we take Dez, I will really try and refrain from the "I told you so's" until Rodgers is taken out in a stretcher or a copy of Bryant's arrest report becomes available for public review.

Good discussion as always, Porky, though I have noticed that you are starting to delve into absolutes, and becoming more strident than in the past. I think I'm a bad influence. :tongue3:
ILikeThePackers39
14 years ago

That has to be absolutely the first time I have ever heard the criticism of a 314 pound lineman include the phrase, "He's all flash."

"porky88" wrote:



There has probably never been a workout from an offensive limeman like the one he gave at the Combine. In that context, he's all flash. However, on film, meh.... There is nothing about him on film the makes him a better prospect than say Charles Brown. He's a guy that looks the part, but doesn't play it well. Personally, that seems to be the consensus with him.

"dfosterf" wrote:




Mayock's criticism rings close to this - workout fiend, but his game tape is average, putting it kindly.

I wouldn't cry if they drafted the guy, but he does freak me out a bit, Mandarich-style.
blank
Pack93z
14 years ago
At 23.. the risk is much lower than the "incredible bust".. not to mention a couple future HOF'ers sitting right behind him.

With all the Roid talk surrounding Tony.. I still can't believe they took him that high.

I honestly don't know why scouts don't just trust the game tape and let this pre-draft hype go by the wayside.. other the the interviews.. what really do you gain from it.

Dez can post the slowest 40 in shorts.. I give a crap less.. on tape you see him getting separation.. that is what matters along with a pair of excellent hands and ball skills when the rock is in the air.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Packers_Finland
14 years ago
I don't think there's any questions as to if Bryant is an excellent prospect, and if he's at 23 he would be kind of a steal.

But come on, we got 4 startable reciever on this team. There's no way we could fit them all to the field, especially after Finley's emergence.

Planning for the future is fine, but not at the expense of fucking up your current squad.

I'm a huge supporter of an offensive tackle and an OLB, Safety and Corner are also positions of need. BPA from those four positions is the best way to go.
This is a placeholder
Fan Shout
Martha Careful (1h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (11h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (11h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (11h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (11h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (15h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (15h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (15h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (18h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (18h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (18h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (18h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (18h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (18h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (18h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (18h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (19h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (19h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (19h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (20h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (20h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (20h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (20h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (21h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (21h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (21h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (21h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (22h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

7h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

10h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.