14 years ago
I always look forward to the off season just to see your videos. Nice job
UserPostedImage
GreeNGold17
14 years ago
REP T DOT TILL THEY BURY ME!

well done !
blank
wils0646
14 years ago
God damn, I'm excited about this guy's future. He's such a mismatch anywhere he lines up.

Still only 23 too!
The Pack Will Be Back.
Dulak
14 years ago
just got to say again that I love this vid and the music to go along with it (ie like to be able to hear the game in the background of the vid)
Nonstopdrivel
14 years ago
Someone please tell me why this man wasn't drafted earlier?

Oh, and that play in the Cardinals game by Rodgers on the designed rollout to the right (completion to Finley down to the 20) was a thing of beauty. Rodgers completed that pass on the sheer strength of his shoulder alone -- no follow-through whatsoever.

And while I've said it before, I'll say it again: There are times Rodgers' mechanics are so Favresque, I feel waves of dj vu. I can't help wonder if his and Favre's natural styles are really just that similar, if he consciously modeled himself on Favre's mechanics, or if McCarthy molded him into what he is now. What I find puzzling is that Favre was always laughed at for having unconventional mechanics, while Rodgers is frequently (now) cited as an example of beautiful mechanics. Considering the similarities in their styles, I don't know how to reconcile those two facts. Maybe someone with more football smarts than I can clue me in.
UserPostedImage
Rockmolder
14 years ago

Someone please tell me why this man wasn't drafted earlier?

Oh, and that play in the Cardinals game by Rodgers on the designed rollout to the right (completion to Finley down to the 20) was a thing of beauty. Rodgers completed that pass on the sheer strength of his shoulder alone -- no follow-through whatsoever.

And while I've said it before, I'll say it again: There are times Rodgers' mechanics are so Favresque, I feel waves of dj vu. I can't help wonder if his and Favre's natural styles are really just that similar, if he consciously modeled himself on Favre's mechanics, or if McCarthy molded him into what he is now. What I find puzzling is that Favre was always laughed at for having unconventional mechanics, while Rodgers is frequently (now) cited as an example of beautiful mechanics. Considering the similarities in their styles, I don't know how to reconcile those two facts. Maybe someone with more football smarts than I can clue me in.

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



Maybe this looks like late-Favre mechanics. After he settled down a little.

The biggest thing is that Rodgers usually does what is mechanically sound. He doesn't break the basic rules. Favre steps up, hops back, moves left a little, goes to the right and throws it to the left side off the field from the right sideline.

Rodgers steps up, scrambles to his right and uses just the right half of the field. I can't recall the last time that Rodgers threw it accross his body like Favre did in the NFCC game.

At least, that's what I think. You're going to need someone else to go deeper on that. I'm still not that much of an expert on QBs.

And I have to agree. Why wasn't Finley drafted earlier than he was? At the time he was drafted, everyone was talking about his athletic ability and playmaking skills, already.

People knew that, had he stayed in college for another year, he could've been a 1st round pick.

I guess they got scared by his 4.82 40 at the combine and his poor blocking skills. Maybe he interviewed a little poorly, as well. He's not the smartest person in the world and having 3 children with 3 different women might've been somewhat of a red flag. Although I don't know if that matters to NFL teams.
Zero2Cool
14 years ago

Someone please tell me why this man wasn't drafted earlier?

"Nonstopdrivel" wrote:



He would have been drafted earlier if he had come out of school a year later. Most thought he was too raw and too much of a project, the Packers felt differently.

Think of this more as the Packers doing very well on selecting him, rather than the rest of the league making a mistake on not selecting him before us.
UserPostedImage
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (2h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
Martha Careful (4h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
buckeyepackfan (14h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
buckeyepackfan (14h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
Mucky Tundra (14h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
Zero2Cool (14h) : Watson gonna be OK???
packerfanoutwest (18h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (18h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (18h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (20h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (20h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (20h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (20h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (20h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (20h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (20h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (20h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (22h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (22h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (22h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (22h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (22h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (23h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (23h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (23h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (23-Dec) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12m / Random Babble / beast

5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

13h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.