buckeyepackfan
14 years ago
There are 31 other teams out there just hoping A.J. Hawk gets released next year.

The only thing the guy has done since joining The Packers is whatever he was asked to do.

The only time he somewhat complaine was when he was in on only 9 plays in a game The Packers lost.

I don't care how much A.J. Hawk makes, he is worth every penny, I laugh everytime one of these threads comes up.

Just because A.J. Hawk hasn't lived up to some peoples expectations, he is thrown under the bus whenever possible.

Led the team in tackles his rookie year, finished 2nd in tackles the next year, played through rib and groin injuries his third year when most guys would have been put on IR,let's not mention moving to middle linebacker(a position he had never played) when Barnett went out for the year.

He went through the same transition as every other defensive player did last year and IMHO played pretty damn well.

A. J. Hawk will be starting for The Packers in 2010, he will be there every game, just like the last 4 years, he will do as he is coached.

Just because he was drafted #5 and hasn't become the next LT(that would be Lawrence Taylor for those too young to remember) doesn't make him an average player or an all out bust as some have claimed the last couple of years.

Every player who is drafted by The Packers is not going to become the best at his position, I will take A.J. Hawk on my team anytime, hopefully Ted realizes how valuable he is next year when it comes to resigning him.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
earthquake
14 years ago
Looking back at the 2006 draft, there is only one player drafted after him in the top20 or so i would say i would have taken over hawk, and that is Haloti Ngata. Hindsight being 20-20, i would say that it was a very good pick, and Hawk is getting paid fair market value among his peers.

I think the bigger issue here is the insane money that goes to the top10 picks in the draft, virtually garunteeing they will be overpaid for their level of play if they are anyone outside of Peyton Manning.

I mean really, look at these guys. Who isn't overpaid here?
1. Mario Williams, after a slot start has played great to good football, maybe overpaid for the #1 pick?
2. Reggie Bush highly overpayed
3. Vince Young, basically a bust until the last half of 09
4. D'Brickashaw Ferguson, OT on one of the best olines in football, probabbly earning his paycheck
5. AJ Hawk, Started nearly every game since being drafted, very consistant, solid player. Has a bajillion tackles
6. Vernon Davis, very slow start, bust lable on him until 09
7. Michael Huff, rumored to be on up for trade because of his high contract
8. Donte Whitner.... Who?
9. Ernie Sims, solid player, but no superstar
10. Matt Leinart still trying to fight off that bust lable, will have to see how he does in 2010
11. Jay Cutler, we know the story here
12. Haloti Ngata, Pro-Bowl/All Pro NT, this is about the only guy picked below hawk who is head-and-shoulders better than him

etc....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_NFL_Draft 
blank
14 years ago
If you remember that draft Ted was on the phone discussing trading down and took the full 15 minutes. He did not get enough offered to trade down.

Look at that first round:

1 Mario Williams DE North Carolina State Houston Texans
2 Reggie Bush RB USC New Orleans Saints
3 Vince Young QB Texas Tennessee Titans
4 D'Brickashaw Ferguson T Virginia New York Jets
5 A.J. Hawk OLB Ohio State Green Bay Packers
6 Vernon Davis TE Maryland San Francisco 49ers
7 Michael Huff SS Texas Oakland Raiders
8 Donte Whitner SS Ohio State Buffalo Bills
9 Ernie Sims OLB Florida State Detroit Lions
10 Matt Leinart QB USC Arizona Cardinals
11 Jay Cutler QB Vanderbilt Denver Broncos
12 Haloti Ngata DT Oregon Baltimore Ravens
13 Kamerion Wimbley OLB Florida State Cleveland Browns
14 Brodrick Bunkley DT Florida State Philadelphia Eagles
15 Tye Hill CB Clemson St. Louis Rams
16 Jason Allen DB Tennessee Miami Dolphins
17 Chad Greenway LB Iowa Minnesota Vikings
18 Bobby Carpenter LB Ohio State Dallas Cowboys
19 Antonio Cromartie CB Florida State San Diego Chargers
20 Tamba Hali DE Penn State Kansas City Chiefs
21 Laurence Maroney RB Minnesota New England Patriots
22 Manny Lawson OLB North Carolina State San Francisco 49ers
23 Davin Joseph G Oklahoma Tampa Bay Buccaneers
24 Johnathan Joseph CB South Carolina Cincinnati Bengals
25 Santonio Holmes WR Ohio State Pittsburgh Steelers
26 John McCargo DT North Carolina State Buffalo Bills
27 DeAngelo Williams RB Memphis Carolina Panthers
28 Marcedes Lewis TE UCLA Jacksonville Jaguars
29 Nick Mangold C Ohio State New York Jets
30 Joseph Addai RB Louisiana State Indianapolis Colts
31 Kelly Jennings CB Miami (Fla.) Seattle Seahawks
32 Mathias Kiwanuka


None of them have become very big players in the NFL.

Had he traded down would he have gotten Cutler or Ngata??

Hawk is paid what his draft position dictated. It wasn'ta great class for 1st round picks.
blank
PackerTraxx
14 years ago


These are only 2 but I'm sure I can find many more. IMHO we have not gotten what we expected. What I recall is Hawk was the most sure thing. Williams was the big question mark. Hawk certainly has the measureables. I believe part of it is coaching, that's why I still have hope.

"pack93z" wrote:



Well if that is the hopes.. then don't hold your breathe.

Winston Moss was his position coach under Sanders.. and remains it today.. much to my dismay. ;)

"PackerTraxx" wrote:



Point taken. Good point also,and that's one thing that puzzles me, the Packers seem to be very high on Moss and I don't feel that our LB play has been as good as it should have based on 2 first round draft choices and now 3 at that position. Maybe Dom will get involved and make it better.
Why is Jerry Kramer not in the Hall of Fame?
PackFanWithTwins
14 years ago
It is pretty obvious that packer fans don't vote for Hawk to go to the Pro Bowl, because is seems like nobody likes him. So getting the alternate bid must be from those that actually know what to look for.

Hawk is the work horse, he takes on block for others. There is one play I can remember clearly. It was a sweep play where the other team had three guys leading it. Hawk was first to the point and dives in a takes out 2 of the blockers allowing Barnett an angle to make the tackle.

Often people see Hawk diving from behind at a RB and say how bad he is, what they are not seeing is that almost every time, that dive is on the opposite side of the field. Which means that if he is making or attempting the tackle there are a few more that messed up more than Hawk. But he gets the attention.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
Pack93z
14 years ago

It is pretty obvious that packer fans don't vote for Hawk to go to the Pro Bowl, because is seems like nobody likes him. So getting the alternate bid must be from those that actually know what to look for.

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



I have been critical of Hawk... it isn't because I don't like him, that I am not fair to him or that I fail to see it.

My one and only knock on the kid is that he plays tentatively. As the years progressed it has gotten worse not better.. maybe it is a lack of confidence, maybe he thinks he can't make a mistake... whatever the reason he hasn't been decisive in his reads or won't allow those instincts bleed through that we seen at OSU.

Or maybe the jump in competition makes him appear to be lethargic compared to his college days.

Some have covered it with he lifted to many weights and became muscle bound.. some have said the system... etc..

In my eyes he played a touch better 09' than in 08' or 07'... and I am hoping for more in 10'..

Watch him play though.. really watch 07 and 08 tape and you will see that he is sitting on his heals waiting for a half beat to full beat longer than he should.. like he is over thinking the play and not letting his nose smell it out. This causes him to get engaged a yard or two too deep on plays and by the time he can get off the play it is behind him already.

I don't disagree he takes on a block a hell of a lot better than Barnett... but I will say Bishop is better at this point in taking on the block and in the run support role.. But Hawk is the more complete player than Bishop..

Go back through my rants on this guy... and the majority of my frustration is just that.. he isn't the instinctive force he was in college.. that doesn't make him a bad NFL player.. just a player not playing up to his potential in my eyes.

Been my knock since mid 07' when I start to notice the pattern change from 06 into the 07 season.. which is that indecisiveness he picked up in his game.

BTW... time and time again I have placed the majority of the blame of his regression on Moss.. and I still hold that opinion.. hence why I hoped he was hired away or got the hook with the rest of the defensive core. Nothing against him, thought he was a hell of a player, just think the backers under his direction regressed in his tenure.
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
British
14 years ago
Just imagine how our OLine situation might be had we had snagged D'Brickashaw Ferguson instead of him going to the Jets one pick earlier. And he has the weirdest/coolest first name in sports. Ah well.

And kudos to the Texans. They got so much crap for passing on Reggie Bush, yet made a good call in the end.
UserPostedImage
Packers_Finland
14 years ago

Just imagine how our OLine situation might be had we had snagged D'Brickashaw Ferguson instead of him going to the Jets one pick earlier. And he has the weirdest/coolest first name in sports. Ah well.

And kudos to the Texans. They got so much crap for passing on Reggie Bush, yet made a good call in the end.

"British" wrote:



Stupid to look over things like that in hindsight. We had no OL problems then, Clifton and Tauscher still had years in them, and they were really good. And if we hadn't drafted AJ, we would've sucked at OLB pretty hard for a couple of years.
This is a placeholder
Stevetarded
14 years ago

It is pretty obvious that packer fans don't vote for Hawk to go to the Pro Bowl, because is seems like nobody likes him. So getting the alternate bid must be from those that actually know what to look for.

"pack93z" wrote:


I don't disagree he takes on a block a hell of a lot better than Barnett... but I will say Bishop is better at this point in taking on the block and in the run support role.. But Hawk is the more complete player than Bishop..

"PackFanWithTwins" wrote:



It seemed opposite of that last year. Barnett was slipping past blockers while Hawk would just get blown up most of the time.
blank
British
14 years ago

Just imagine how our OLine situation might be had we had snagged D'Brickashaw Ferguson instead of him going to the Jets one pick earlier. And he has the weirdest/coolest first name in sports. Ah well.

And kudos to the Texans. They got so much crap for passing on Reggie Bush, yet made a good call in the end.

"Packers_Finland" wrote:



Stupid to look over things like that in hindsight. We had no OL problems then, Clifton and Tauscher still had years in them, and they were really good. And if we hadn't drafted AJ, we would've sucked at OLB pretty hard for a couple of years.

"British" wrote:



Whoa, calm down kid 🙂 I'm just saying.
UserPostedImage
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    packerfanoutwest (1h) : both games Watson missed, Packers won
    Martha Careful (3h) : I hope all of you have a Merry Christmas!
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Oh I know about Jacobs, I just couldn't pass up an opportunity to mimic Zero lol
    buckeyepackfan (13h) : Jacobs was just sat down, Watson re-injured that knee that kept him out 1 game earlier
    buckeyepackfan (13h) : I needed .14 that's. .14 points for the whole 4th quarter to win and go to the SB. Lol
    Mucky Tundra (13h) : Jacobs gonna be OK???
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Watson gonna be OK???
    packerfanoutwest (16h) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
    packerfanoutwest (17h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
    Zero2Cool (19h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
    Zero2Cool (19h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
    bboystyle (19h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
    Zero2Cool (19h) : Ahh, ok.
    bboystyle (19h) : yes due to tie breaker
    Zero2Cool (19h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
    Zero2Cool (19h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
    bboystyle (19h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
    Mucky Tundra (20h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
    beast (21h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
    beast (21h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
    Zero2Cool (21h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
    bboystyle (21h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
    Mucky Tundra (21h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
    Zero2Cool (22h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
    beast (22h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
    packerfanoutwest (22h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
    Zero2Cool (23h) : I see what you did there Mucky
    Zero2Cool (23h) : dammit. 3:25pm
    Zero2Cool (23h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
    Mucky Tundra (23h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
    Mucky Tundra (23h) : Yeah baby!
    Zero2Cool (23h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
    beast (23-Dec) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : ok I stand corrected
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
    beast (23-Dec) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
    beast (23-Dec) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
    beast (23-Dec) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
    beast (23-Dec) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
    beast (23-Dec) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : I literally just said it.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Dec) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
    Zero2Cool (23-Dec) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    2h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    8h / GameDay Threads / Mucky Tundra

    12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    23-Dec / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

    19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

    18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.