You just start stocking up on beer if Lang is the one. I'll accept Blue Moon.

Jamaal Brown will be starting for us next year at LT.

I just have to work out some minor details.

And Rock, we are picking 23rd, not 3rd, lol

Fuckin' Z usin' me asking for an opinion to get another one of his agenda posts in, lol GD Lang spends like 10 minutes in 2009 at LT (most of it on his ass, btw) and now he is a superior option to a legitimate 1st round LT draft pick.




j/k

Lol.

I'd be fine with any other tackle falling to us. I'd even rather have Brown than Williams. I've come around on Bulaga, as well. Take him. I don't mind.

I'd rather have us trading up, losing our 2nd and 3rd in the process, and picking a guy like Campbell or Bulaga than going with Trent Williams.

I'm with Pack93 here. I'd rather have Lang at LT than Williams.

I don't know if I would rather have Lang there over Williams.

I'd sure like to be having the debate, though.

Here is another Packer fan's opinion of him.

Not to argue, because everyone can have an opinion, but just to get him some equal time, especially in the sense of a concept where someone says Brown over Williams.

From Packerchatters 

Someone go tell Z you can't bitch about not HAVING them if you don't DRAFT them. (Quality linemen)

Startin' to heat up....discussion-wise...'bout time....too bad this is in the wrong friggin' category, lol

I want Lang to have to compete.

And I want Lang and the guy he's competing with to have someone to compete with.

It is simply impossible for the GBP to draft too many OL in this draft.

(large raspberry noise toward everyone other than foster)

---