Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages123>
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline digsthepack  
#1 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 2:05:33 PM(UTC)
digsthepack

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 7

The elimination of Bob Sanders from the payroll. Winners are built on affecting the QB, and we do not do that. Offenses are so well orchestrated that no matter how good the secondary, given time (and we DO give time!!), QBs will eat them up with no pressure. Sanders, while a seemingly decent man, is rigid and lacks the creativity to make do when everything is not perfect. Don't care if we go 4-3 or 3-4, but I want an aggressive, mean, punishing defense....and a couple Wayne Simmons/Mike Douglass type players to stir that concoction. Mike Nolan??

Same with Mike Stock! The Derrick Frost recommendation alone makes this move feasible, but the substantial decline of performance and accountability on coverage is no longer something to be tolerated.

I approve of the job that Ted Thompson has done thus far, very much so. And yes, I agree with moving Favre, who would not make a difference except possibly deny us a future QB had he stuck around. That said, it is time to spend some dough on a havoc-wreaking DL and OL.

I wish that AJ Hawk's play is the result of injury and/or bad scheme/coaching. Never have I seen a player with such promise fade so quickly. My guess is the scheme tries to fit square pegs into round holes.

I wish Mike McCarthy would demand more from players, and if they do not deliver, make a change in who starts. Too often I witness some of our better players playing as dumb as I have ever seen the game played....as evidenced by our penalty count this year.

I wish we would get some road-graders and dump the friggin' ZBS......we are getting beat PHYSICALLY every week along the OL....and I do not believe the ZBS translates well to our late season cold weather games.

Just a start.......
State Motto: "Wisconsin, our serial murderers eat their kill!"
Sponsor
Offline bozz_2006  
#2 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 2:08:49 PM(UTC)
bozz_2006

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 7/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 11

as usual, i agree.
UserPostedImage
Offline DakotaT  
#3 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 2:31:02 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 637
Applause Received: 1,313

It's a good start Digs.


My Christmas wish:

Mrs. DakotaT would spend less money and obey her husband like the Priest told her to at our wedding ceremony.

I wish for a lights out defense for the Packers!

I wish for politicians at all levels of government who gave a sh!t about average people who get up every day and go to work and pay their taxes.
UserPostedImage
Offline Pack93z  
#4 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 2:43:07 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,027

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post

I wish for politicians at all levels of government who gave a sh!t about average people who get up every day and go to work and pay their taxes.


Amen..

On topic..

I wish that Barnett is moved outside to take advantage of his speed.. Hawk to be coached up to take advantage of his physical talents.. or should I say get them to be utilized. And a thumping MLB.. whether that be Bishop or whomever that can bring the hammer to the run defense.. hell take him off the field in passing down if you have to..

But I want more plays like Bishop knifing through and dropping a running back in the backfield with a solid wrapped up tackle.. that was a thing of beauty.. how many times did Hawk this year tackle high and get carried down the field for a few?

Fundamentals.. return of solid fundamentals and elimination of mental errors.. lose because they beat you.. not because you allowed yourself to be beaten by playing lax ball.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline Packnic  
#5 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 2:48:04 PM(UTC)
Packnic

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 6/19/2007(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post

I wish for politicians at all levels of government who gave a sh!t about average people who get up every day and go to work and pay their taxes.


Amen..

On topic..

I wish that Barnett is moved outside to take advantage of his speed.. Hawk to be coached up to take advantage of his physical talents.. or should I say get them to be utilized. And a thumping MLB.. whether that be Bishop or whomever that can bring the hammer to the run defense.. hell take him off the field in passing down if you have to..

But I want more plays like Bishop knifing through and dropping a running back in the backfield with a solid wrapped up tackle.. that was a thing of beauty.. how many times did Hawk this year tackle high and get carried down the field for a few?

Fundamentals.. return of solid fundamentals and elimination of mental errors.. lose because they beat you.. not because you allowed yourself to be beaten by playing lax ball.



I agree 100% ... there is no meanness. no drive no kill from our LBs. Watching them get drug by Slaton for 4 yards at least everytime was sickening. And Bishop did do an excellent job on some run plays. but anytime you are that bad in one major aspect of the game... then no matter how well you do in another you can't be on the field.
blank
Offline Pack93z  
#6 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 2:59:27 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,027

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post

I agree 100% ... there is no meanness. no drive no kill from our LBs. Watching them get drug by Slaton for 4 yards at least everytime was sickening. And Bishop did do an excellent job on some run plays. but anytime you are that bad in one major aspect of the game... then no matter how well you do in another you can't be on the field.


Again.. that comes back to coaching.. utilize your strengths on defense.. I think back to an example at hand.. Bernardo Harris.. excellent in the box backer.. the coaching staff utilized his strengths and minimized his weakness.. Harris either walked to the sideline or dropped into a short zone.. they didn't match him up in coverage because he was a downhill backer..

Quality coaches design a recipe in utilizing your resources properly.. not forcing guys into playing against a position of strength in their game.. that there is the underlying meaning of Ted's quote about the alignment of our defense.. we aren't utilizing the blend of talent we have.

That there is the hidden meaning of Ted's comment.. doesn't bode well for the DC.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline digsthepack  
#7 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 3:04:01 PM(UTC)
digsthepack

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 7

What comments did Ted Thompson make with regard to the DC??
State Motto: "Wisconsin, our serial murderers eat their kill!"
Offline Pack93z  
#8 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 3:07:04 PM(UTC)
Pack93z

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Bronze: 2012

United States
Joined: 3/16/2007(UTC)
Location: North Central Wisconsin

Applause Given: 381
Applause Received: 1,027

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
What comments did Ted Thompson make with regard to the DC??


http://www.packershome.c...ile=viewtopic&t=2814

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Calling out Sanders?

Link

Quote:
The defensive line has received significant criticism, arguably going from a position of strength last year to one of weakness.

Thompson doesnt agree.

I think in some respects thats an inaccurate statement to say its the defensive line, he said. I think our guys have played very hard and we dont have the sacks that we maybe would have expected or had last year. But theyve played well. Again, the defense is an 11-man thing.
[size=20]Its got to be orchestrated properly.[/size] And we just havent quite hit our stride yet.
I think when there's enough will and aggression, there's no shortage of talent either.

UserPostedImage
Offline digsthepack  
#9 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 3:10:26 PM(UTC)
digsthepack

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 7

Well, it seems one big change is imminent!
State Motto: "Wisconsin, our serial murderers eat their kill!"
Offline Packnic  
#10 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 3:12:15 PM(UTC)
Packnic

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 6/19/2007(UTC)


damn you're fast 93... got all the info and links and bam you got it posted already.


as far as firing Sanders... it never really seemed like the guy was picked for the job anyway... just kind of given the reigns because he worked with a very good DC in Bates. I don't think that warrants a job necessarily and when your D has regressed as badly as this one (injuries and all) I don't really see why we would keep him.

my wishlist is that Thompson knew this would be a tough restructuring year all along and was planning on this upcoming offseason being the one that he really puts his stamp on.
blank
Offline minnypacker  
#11 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 3:20:13 PM(UTC)
minnypacker

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 8/12/2008(UTC)


The D needs a new philosophy....period. Mike Nolan would be a good guy to bring in if he wants to be a coordinator. I wish we could bring Dick LeBeau back...but that ain't happening.
blank
Offline dfosterf  
#12 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 3:27:47 PM(UTC)
dfosterf

Rank: All Pro

United States
Joined: 8/19/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 174
Applause Received: 392

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
The elimination of Bob Sanders from the payroll. Winners are built on affecting the QB, and we do not do that. Offenses are so well orchestrated that no matter how good the secondary, given time (and we DO give time!!), QBs will eat them up with no pressure. Sanders, while a seemingly decent man, is rigid and lacks the creativity to make do when everything is not perfect. Don't care if we go 4-3 or 3-4, but I want an aggressive, mean, punishing defense....and a couple Wayne Simmons/Mike Douglass type players to stir that concoction. Mike Nolan??

Same with Mike Stock! The Derrick Frost recommendation alone makes this move feasible, but the substantial decline of performance and accountability on coverage is no longer something to be tolerated.

I approve of the job that Ted Thompson has done thus far, very much so. And yes, I agree with moving Favre, who would not make a difference except possibly deny us a future QB had he stuck around. That said, it is time to spend some dough on a havoc-wreaking DL and OL.

I wish that AJ Hawk's play is the result of injury and/or bad scheme/coaching. Never have I seen a player with such promise fade so quickly. My guess is the scheme tries to fit square pegs into round holes.

I wish Mike McCarthy would demand more from players, and if they do not deliver, make a change in who starts. Too often I witness some of our better players playing as dumb as I have ever seen the game played....as evidenced by our penalty count this year.

I wish we would get some road-graders and dump the friggin' ZBS......we are getting beat PHYSICALLY every week along the OL....and I do not believe the ZBS translates well to our late season cold weather games.

Just a start.......


This is an extremely solid + 1 post. Including the "Just a start"

+1 and then some, actually.
UserPostedImage
damn skippy I'm an owner. I currently own a full .00001924537805515393 % of the Green Bay Packers.



Offline IronMan  
#13 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 3:40:44 PM(UTC)
IronMan

Rank: Pro Bowl

ESPN NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2010

Joined: 8/7/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 30
Applause Received: 56

I just want a win over the Lions. Please, for the love of GOD do not lose to the Lions.
Offline bozz_2006  
#14 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 3:42:29 PM(UTC)
bozz_2006

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 7/15/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 19
Applause Received: 11

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
I just want a win over the Lions. Please, for the love of GOD do not lose to the Lions.


i know. if there's anything as bad as going 0-16, it's being the team that lost to a 1-15 club.
UserPostedImage
Offline DakotaT  
#15 Posted : Monday, December 8, 2008 4:28:07 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 637
Applause Received: 1,313

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
I just want a win over the Lions. Please, for the love of GOD do not lose to the Lions.


If that loss nets us a stud DE or LT, I don't care.

But I hear ya!!!!!
UserPostedImage
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages123>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
1m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

36m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

37m / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

53m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / mi_keys

9h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

10h / Random Babble / wpr

15h / Random Babble / dfosterf

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

16h / Welcome to our Community! / dfosterf

19h / Green Bay Packers Talk / luigis

22h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / texaspackerbacker

27-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / sschind


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.