Join Our Green Bay Packers Interactive Community!

We have been providing fans with the best source of Packers information since 2006!
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
2 Pages12>
Options
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline MintBaconDrivel  
#1 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 7:45:24 PM(UTC)
MintBaconDrivel

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 12/11/2012(UTC)

Applause Received: 97

A.J. Hawk didn't have a dramatically better year in 2013 than previous years. Fans merely gave him the credit he's deserved.


2013
Tackles: 118
Sacks: 5.0


2012
Tackles: 120
Sacks: 3.0
Delivering the latest and most important updates on the Green Bay Packers for your convenience.
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
FLORIDA PACKER88 on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline gbguy20  
#2 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 8:52:30 PM(UTC)
gbguy20

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/28/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 206
Applause Received: 285

solid numbers imo
call me Dan
thanks Post received 1 applause.
FLORIDA PACKER88 on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline DakotaT  
#3 Posted : Monday, January 27, 2014 8:54:37 PM(UTC)
DakotaT

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 8/18/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 661
Applause Received: 1,360

Haven't you guys riled up poor Buckeye enough?

I actually thought Hawk did have a pretty good year. I didn't see him getting burned by 5 yards deep down the seam. The balls completed on him were usually pretty well thrown. He was noticeably leaner, which kind of bit him in the ass on a few plays when he got run over - but for the most part, he played pretty well.
UserPostedImage
Offline wpr  
#4 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 5:52:35 AM(UTC)
wpr

Rank: Hall of Famer

PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2012PackersHome NFL Pick'em - Gold: 2013FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3,030
Applause Received: 1,467

Originally Posted by: MintBaconDrivel Go to Quoted Post
A.J. Hawk didn't have a dramatically better year in 2013 than previous years. Fans merely gave him the credit he's deserved.


2013
Tackles: 118
Sacks: 5.0


2012
Tackles: 120
Sacks: 3.0


I guess that means he has reached the top and leveled off. Nothing wrong with that.

UserPostedImage

Offline play2win  
#5 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:03:56 AM(UTC)
play2win

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 3/29/2012(UTC)
Location: Milwaukee

Applause Given: 1,076
Applause Received: 725

I thought there was no doubt that he improved. Came in lighter, which helped his speed and coverage, and that was noticeable.

He was coming off of two pretty poor seasons, so this was good to see. I would like to see what he would do with a legit ILB alongside of him. Oddly enough, we lost Bishop and his effectiveness plummeted. Bishop is another player Ted never really replaced.
Online Zero2Cool  
#6 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:05:08 AM(UTC)
Zero2Cool

Rank: Legend

Yahoo! Fantasy Football - Gold: 2009FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Silver: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Silver: 2011ESPN NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2010Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Bronze: 2013

United States
Joined: 10/13/2006(UTC)
Location: Green Bay, WI

Applause Given: 1,955
Applause Received: 2,186

Hawk has been the same player he has always been. Reliable and none risk taking. Even his position coach joked that he would like to see Hawk take a risk here and there, but then followed it up with that he's the most assignment sure player on defense.


I think those who say Hawk really came into his own or really had a great year ... haven't really paid much attention to Hawk in the first place.
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
RaiderPride on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#7 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 6:09:17 AM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,629
Applause Received: 652

I thought he cut down on the number of yards lost per tackle. Maybe down to 3 instead of his customary 5-7.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline Laser Gunns  
#8 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 7:13:17 AM(UTC)
Laser Gunns

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 9/30/2009(UTC)

Applause Given: 40
Applause Received: 244

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
I thought he cut down on the number of yards lost per tackle. Maybe down to 3 instead of his customary 5-7.


Without looking at tape,

That could be more of a reflection in the DL for constantly getting blown off the LoS.


MintBaconDrivel

Dec, 11, 2012 - FOREVER!
Offline texaspackerbacker  
#9 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:04:05 AM(UTC)
texaspackerbacker

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Yahoo! NCAA March Madness - Gold: 2014

United States
Joined: 3/4/2013(UTC)
Location: Texas

Applause Given: 452
Applause Received: 272

If what we want is a marginal player in an important position, then he's our man. If he was the second best ILB, then no problem. But you look around at what most teams in the league have at ILB or MLB, and Hawk doesn't stack up very well - Jones even worse. Putting an athletic young ILB beside Hawk, then replacing Hawk with another quality young ILB in a year or so is pretty much what we need to do. Hopefully Thompson will get that done. Borland in the second or third round would help a lot. Just starting Lattimore over Jones would help some.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.
thanks Post received 1 applause.
DoddPower on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline Bigbyfan  
#10 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 12:20:43 PM(UTC)
Bigbyfan

Rank: 4th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/8/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 26
Applause Received: 81

He's the one guy on our team that we can depend on to show up every week. As long as he can stay healthy, the Packers are in no position to replace him with yet another injury prone player.
blank
thanks Post received 1 applause.
wpr on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline nerdmann  
#11 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:03:15 PM(UTC)
nerdmann

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 2,629
Applause Received: 652

Originally Posted by: texaspackerbacker Go to Quoted Post
If what we want is a marginal player in an important position, then he's our man. If he was the second best ILB, then no problem. But you look around at what most teams in the league have at ILB or MLB, and Hawk doesn't stack up very well - Jones even worse. Putting an athletic young ILB beside Hawk, then replacing Hawk with another quality young ILB in a year or so is pretty much what we need to do. Hopefully Thompson will get that done. Borland in the second or third round would help a lot. Just starting Lattimore over Jones would help some.


Jones is fine when he's healthy. Can also swing to OLB in a pinch.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Offline DoddPower  
#12 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 1:29:53 PM(UTC)
DoddPower

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Gold: 2011

United States
Joined: 9/24/2007(UTC)
Location: Visalia, CA

Applause Given: 2,040
Applause Received: 514

Originally Posted by: nerdmann Go to Quoted Post
Jones is fine when he's healthy. Can also swing to OLB in a pinch.


Sure, he's fine . . . as a back up.

thanks Post received 2 applause.
yooperfan on 1/28/2014(UTC), texaspackerbacker on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline luigis  
#13 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 3:52:49 PM(UTC)
luigis

Rank: 6th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 92
Applause Received: 95

AJ would be a fine player next to a playmaker.
He's not a playmaker and we need to find one.
Luis
thanks Post received 2 applause.
wpr on 1/28/2014(UTC), texaspackerbacker on 1/28/2014(UTC)
Offline cheeseheads123  
#14 Posted : Tuesday, January 28, 2014 8:39:39 PM(UTC)
cheeseheads123

Rank: 3rd Round Draft Pick

Joined: 9/28/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 71
Applause Received: 114

I agree with everyone saying he needs to be the second best ILB on the team.
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 2 applause.
texaspackerbacker on 1/28/2014(UTC), luigis on 1/29/2014(UTC)
Offline PackFanWithTwins  
#15 Posted : Wednesday, January 29, 2014 7:36:10 AM(UTC)
PackFanWithTwins

Rank: 1st Round Draft Pick

Joined: 9/26/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 13
Applause Received: 371

Hawk for his career may not have made the most flashy plays, he just has done what is needed to allow others around him to make plays. Amazing how many times Hawk has been criticized for being dragged for a few yards on a tackle when it never should have been him making the tackle in the first place. Hawk is the backside LB on most plays and his main job is to not let the RB get a big run by cutting back and he does a pretty good job of that.

The world needs ditch diggers to Danny!!!
UserPostedImage
thanks Post received 1 applause.
FLORIDA PACKER88 on 1/29/2014(UTC)
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Tweeter

Recent Topics
32m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

34m / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

11h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Pack93z

20h / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / GermanGilbert

21h / Green Bay Packers Talk / AbbaGav

23h / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan