If the third-down conversion that had allowed the Packers to ice the clock and win the divisional round game against the Seahawks hadn't been so close and controversial, the focal point of the final minutes of the game would have been the decision of the Seahawks to punt the ball to the Packers with 2:32 [more]

Continue Reading @ Mike Florio 

Sounds like Florino had money on the hawks cuz he hates GB.

Typical muckraker second guesser. Punting was the right call with the way their defense had been playing

I would of punted as well, he has nothing to defend, it was the right call.

If you don't get it that 4th and long, your game is over with no chance at all.

3 timeouts + 2 minutes warning is more then enough time to potentially get the ball back.

I would of punted as well, he has nothing to defend, it was the right call.

If you don't get it that 4th and long, your game is over with no chance at all.

3 timeouts + 2 minutes warning is more then enough time to potentially get the ball back.

Precisely. If it was 4th and short, go for it. 4th and long, hope your d can get a quick stop.

If McCarthy was still coach, the Packers never would’ve passed on 3rd down. They would have run the ball, not got the first down, and the Seahawks would have got the ball and won the game.

If McCarthy was still coach, the Packers never would’ve passed on 3rd down. They would have run the ball, not got the first down, and the Seahawks would have got the ball and won the game.

Yup, seems Lafleur is more willing to attack in crucial moments - McCarthy had a tendency to hide in his shell in those moments.

As to the decision to punt - I think it was the right call. I would think you are more likely to get a stop on defense than convert a 4th and long. The clock being the deciding factor - if it were under 2 minutes, the discussion becomes very different.