Welcome to your Green Bay Packers Online Community!

Since 2006, PackersHome has been providing a unique experience for fans.
Your participation is greatly anticipated!
Login or Register.
3 Pages<123
Options
View
Go to last post Go to first unread
Offline alldaybaby  
#31 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:45:22 PM(UTC)
alldaybaby

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 11/6/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Fine if you've got Sky, i don't and many others don't. I can get Sky Sports for a hefty fee on my Cable.If you want to expand the fan base in the UK it needs to go out on Terrestrial TV, like it did back in the day on Channel 4




believe me that will never happen , sky paid a hefty fee to insure that it doesn't , they even outbid NASN which is a channel dedicated solely to american sports , not trying to be nosey but how much is skysports on cable ?, i pay 12 euros a week which is about a tenner in sterling , and its great value for money seeing as you get about 800 channels along with all the sports channels , o.k you can only watch one channel at the time , but the choice is there
a classic Aaron rogers quote\r\n\r\nquote: \&quot;I\&#039;ve got a roommate, a guy I met in town. He works for the Packers now as an athletic trainer....He\&#039;s been great for me...Our friendship goes a lot deeper than what we do. \&quot;
Offline alldaybaby  
#32 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 12:48:07 PM(UTC)
alldaybaby

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 11/6/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
It's never on here either, I've seen one game in my entire life on regular cable TV... the Seahawks - Steelers superbowl.

It's kind of a vicious circle atm. The game isn't very well known and/or popular so it doesn't get alot of time on time. No one finds out about it and the game doesn't get more popular.

Internet seems to be changing that though, never knew there where this much other non-American people that liked the sport.



so were are you ?
a classic Aaron rogers quote\r\n\r\nquote: \&quot;I\&#039;ve got a roommate, a guy I met in town. He works for the Packers now as an athletic trainer....He\&#039;s been great for me...Our friendship goes a lot deeper than what we do. \&quot;
Offline Rockmolder  
#33 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 1:08:06 PM(UTC)
Rockmolder

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 147
Applause Received: 243

The Netherlands.

And the superbowl broadcast was more of a big commercial for the Amsterdam Admirals... at 1:00 am or so.

In all honesty, there are some play-off games on German tv, but I can't stand their chatter and without commentating it gets somewhat boring.

BBC usually has the SB aswell, at least, it did last year (as you know, I guess) but had to go to school the day after. Not gonna miss it this year though :p.
UserPostedImage
Offline PresterJohn  
#34 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 1:58:50 PM(UTC)
PresterJohn

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Fine if you've got Sky, i don't and many others don't. I can get Sky Sports for a hefty fee on my Cable.If you want to expand the fan base in the UK it needs to go out on Terrestrial TV, like it did back in the day on Channel 4




believe me that will never happen , sky paid a hefty fee to insure that it doesn't , they even outbid NASN which is a channel dedicated solely to american sports , not trying to be nosey but how much is skysports on cable ?, i pay 12 euros a week which is about a tenner in sterling , and its great value for money seeing as you get about 800 channels along with all the sports channels , o.k you can only watch one channel at the time , but the choice is there


Well i think the NFL recognises the need to expand the fan base using terrestrial - its given the superbowl to the BBC last year and this year, and the Wembley match was broadcast live by the bbc this year.

For me each sky sports channel cost 20 / month, thats on top of what i already pay and per individual channel. I've got friends who subscribe so i can visit them instead :)
memento mori
Offline alldaybaby  
#35 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:02:48 PM(UTC)
alldaybaby

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 11/6/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
The Netherlands.

And the superbowl broadcast was more of a big commercial for the Amsterdam Admirals... at 1:00 am or so.

In all honesty, there are some play-off games on German tv, but I can't stand their chatter and without commentating it gets somewhat boring.

BBC usually has the SB aswell, at least, it did last year (as you know, I guess) but had to go to school the day after. Not gonna miss it this year though :p.



first off .....i wanna say sorry if i've ever said anything out of line to you , sometimes i forget myself that kids could be using this forum , not trying to be condersending it just you mentioned you had to go to bed because you had school in the morning so i just assumed you're younger than i thought .........anyways yes you're right the BBC has shown the last 3 SBs i believe but skysports have great coverage and analysis , and a couple of really good presenters i tried to watch last years on the bbc but got bored with the people presenting it that i soon swithched back to sky ,

and i lol'd at the dig at the germans, i've been to holland a number of times when i was big into soccer i still am but don't really go to games much its a nice country
a classic Aaron rogers quote\r\n\r\nquote: \&quot;I\&#039;ve got a roommate, a guy I met in town. He works for the Packers now as an athletic trainer....He\&#039;s been great for me...Our friendship goes a lot deeper than what we do. \&quot;
Offline alldaybaby  
#36 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:07:40 PM(UTC)
alldaybaby

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 11/6/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Fine if you've got Sky, i don't and many others don't. I can get Sky Sports for a hefty fee on my Cable.If you want to expand the fan base in the UK it needs to go out on Terrestrial TV, like it did back in the day on Channel 4




believe me that will never happen , sky paid a hefty fee to insure that it doesn't , they even outbid NASN which is a channel dedicated solely to american sports , not trying to be nosey but how much is skysports on cable ?, i pay 12 euros a week which is about a tenner in sterling , and its great value for money seeing as you get about 800 channels along with all the sports channels , o.k you can only watch one channel at the time , but the choice is there


Well i think the NFL recognises the need to expand the fan base using terrestrial - its given the superbowl to the BBC last year and this year, and the Wembley match was broadcast live by the bbc this year.

For me each sky sports channel cost 20 / month, thats on top of what i already pay and per individual channel. I've got friends who subscribe so i can visit them instead :)


damn them cable copamies know how to screw people so that would be 60 a month just for the 3 main sports channels , it cost less for the whole package of 800 or so channels
a classic Aaron rogers quote\r\n\r\nquote: \&quot;I\&#039;ve got a roommate, a guy I met in town. He works for the Packers now as an athletic trainer....He\&#039;s been great for me...Our friendship goes a lot deeper than what we do. \&quot;
Offline Rockmolder  
#37 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 2:36:09 PM(UTC)
Rockmolder

Rank: Super Bowl MVP

FleaFlicker Fantasy Football - Bronze: 2010

Netherlands
Joined: 9/14/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 147
Applause Received: 243

Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
The Netherlands.

And the superbowl broadcast was more of a big commercial for the Amsterdam Admirals... at 1:00 am or so.

In all honesty, there are some play-off games on German tv, but I can't stand their chatter and without commentating it gets somewhat boring.

BBC usually has the SB aswell, at least, it did last year (as you know, I guess) but had to go to school the day after. Not gonna miss it this year though :p.



first off .....i wanna say sorry if i've ever said anything out of line to you , sometimes i forget myself that kids could be using this forum , not trying to be condersending it just you mentioned you had to go to bed because you had school in the morning so i just assumed you're younger than i thought .........anyways yes you're right the BBC has shown the last 3 SBs i believe but skysports have great coverage and analysis , and a couple of really good presenters i tried to watch last years on the bbc but got bored with the people presenting it that i soon swithched back to sky ,

and i lol'd at the dig at the germans, i've been to holland a number of times when i was big into soccer i still am but don't really go to games much its a nice country


Np, I'm 17, it's just that going to bed at 4:00 and having to wake up at 7:00 isn't gonna work out.

I've been to just one soccer game, as the sport got boring after I played it for 5 years. I watch it on TV occasionally, but I don't wanna spent my money on something that could get me at time at half-time.

That's why I wanna get the Packers here. The Admirals where ok, I guess. They had Ruvell Martin, Kurt Warner etc. But it's like getting a practice squad to play for you, while Brett Favre is slinging it around in GB.

Lets hope this sport gets bigger here, so we can get some quality players from this side of the pond aswell. For as far as I know, there have been just 2 Dutch NFL Players, a little interest and media attention for the sport, and our league wouldn't be that much of a cupcake league anymore.
UserPostedImage
Offline vegOmatic  
#38 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 4:32:12 PM(UTC)
vegOmatic

Rank: 5th Round Draft Pick

Joined: 8/11/2008(UTC)

Applause Received: 3

It really only affects season ticket holders in terms of attending the game. The group that will be outraged the most are those who sell their tickets for a profit since you'd be taking a game away from them.

Business owners and lawn-parking would lose that much income too.

As for me, I would be glad if they took away a December game. I'd save $120 in tickets AND wouldn't have to drive in the snow and sit in the cold.
blank
Offline alldaybaby  
#39 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 5:57:13 PM(UTC)
alldaybaby

Rank: Fresh Cheesehead

Joined: 11/6/2008(UTC)


Originally Posted by: " Go to Quoted Post
It really only affects season ticket holders in terms of attending the game. The group that will be outraged the most are those who sell their tickets for a profit since you'd be taking a game away from them.

Business owners and lawn-parking would lose that much income too.

As for me, I would be glad if they took away a December game. I'd save $120 in tickets AND wouldn't have to drive in the snow and sit in the cold.


IT will never be a december game , the reason being is the teams that travel over always have their bye week following , both games so far have been week 8 , i think that will carry on
a classic Aaron rogers quote\r\n\r\nquote: \&quot;I\&#039;ve got a roommate, a guy I met in town. He works for the Packers now as an athletic trainer....He\&#039;s been great for me...Our friendship goes a lot deeper than what we do. \&quot;
Offline PWT36  
#40 Posted : Wednesday, December 10, 2008 7:40:46 PM(UTC)
PWT36

Rank: 7th Round Draft Pick

United States
Joined: 10/20/2008(UTC)

Applause Given: 3
Applause Received: 31

If the P ackers are scheduled to go over to London for regular season game. The Packers will go . There is no discussion.

If it is A Pa cker home game lost- , the NFL will pay the Packer's for the revenue lost at Packer home game at LF. But the Green Bay area Economy takes a hit for on lost home game weekend . This amounts to around $4M lost to the economy of GB. Businesses such as Hotels, Taverns, Restaurants, gas station ,shopping centers and points of interest (attractions) are the losers. Business persons in GB will not be happy about losing revenue, because the Packers lose a home game in Green Bay, because NFL schedules the Packer s in London.

But the Green Bay Packer organization voted to play regular NFL season games in London, when NFL owners had vote on the NFL teams playing games in London.
Rss Feed 
Users browsing this topic
Guest
3 Pages<123
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Notification

Icon
Error

Recent Topics
2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / porky88

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DoddPower

12h / Green Bay Packers Talk / DarkaneRules

15h / Random Babble / nyrpack

15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / nyrpack

15h / Around The NFL / nyrpack

15h / Around The NFL / nyrpack

15h / Around The NFL / nyrpack

15h / Around The NFL / nyrpack

16h / Green Bay Packers Talk / StarrMax1

1-Sep / Random Babble / dfosterf

30-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / Gaycandybacon

30-Aug / Green Bay Packers Talk / nerdmann


Tweeter

Copyright © 2006-2014 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.