I wonder how much time the Packers are expecting to play in base? It's a passing league.

Originally Posted by: DarkaneRules 

Did you ever ask yourself the question why 9 of 10 DL you felt were better are still on the board and only Butler is gone from the overall list you gave? The Packers aren't the only one's that passed on these guys.
They all did. No denying these are all good players and if they get picked by the right team with a scheme that fits their style they will be fine. That doesn't mean they would have had the same success with the Packers. Obviously Clark was that guy for the Pack at 27.

Like always, time will tell, so we wait and see.

Originally Posted by: warhawk 

As the day has gone by no one has mentioned that the last time GB drafted a DT w the last name of Clark in the 1st round it didn't work out very well.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Probably because that was 35 years ago and was two years prior to the Packers Director-Football Operations even being born yet, lol. Also, wasn't he a defensive end ? Hell, Kenny Clark wasn't even born for another 15 years after that pick! lol

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 

Wiki has Bruce listed as a DT so it must be right. 😉 I thought he was a DE.

Edit- the link in your story calls Bruce a DE. The link to the 1980 draft results list him as a DT.

Originally Posted by: wpr 

Hey, look at my first sentence.

I said, "Obviously, I have no clue."

I didn't say I knew better. I said I really saw things differently. *My* conclusion is that *I* was clueless.

Even if I was correct on Nick Perry. :)

Originally Posted by: Wade 

I haven't seen that many good players available that late since I can remember.

Originally Posted by: warhawk