The projected rounds for each player is a guess on which round I believe the player will be selected. It is not meant to reflect my view of the player or how I think the player will turn out as a pro. That reflection can be seen in the order I rank the player and the analysis I give.
RBs
1. C.J. Spiller, Clemson
The true definition of an all-purpose player, Spiller is just as big as a threat as a receiver and return man as he is in the backfield. He's also arguably the biggest playmaker in the draft along with Dez Bryant. However, he isn't Chris Johnson 2.0 like some think, but not many players are. He'll be very enticing to teams picking in the top half of round one.
Projected Round: 1st
2. Ryan Mathews, Fresno State
Matthews is a compact runner that catches the ball out of the backfield well. He has a great combination of size and speed, but his best quality is he'll never have to come off the field. His proday was terrific and he solidified his status as a first round pick. While he lacks the power of Jonathan Dwyer and the dynamic ability of Spiller, he's still the best three down back in the draft.
Projected Round: 1st
3. Jonathan Dwyer, Georgia Tech
Toughest runner in the draft whom was highly productive at Georgia Tech the last two seasons. Dwyer might fit best in a zone system where he can one cut and go. He'll wear down opposing defenses and he gets stronger as the game goes on. He'll have to watch his weight in the NFL, but should make a good pro if he can make the proper adjustments.
Projected Round: 2nd or 3rd
4. Jahvid Best, California
An explosive player with the versatility to contribute in three phases of the game, Best projects as a third down back in the NFL. While he'll see his carries at the next level, it's his contributions as a receiver and return man that will define him as a player. He may be undersized, but he's every bit as dynamic as Spiller.
Projected Round: 1st or 2nd
5. Dexter McCluster, Mississippi
Arguably one of the most interesting players in the draft, McCluster projects to several different positions. Some see him as a receiver and others a runningback, but there is no denying that he'll be a unique weapon for whatever team selects him. It's worth noting he doesn't have great straight line speed, but he's quick and explosive when he has the football.
Projected Round: 2nd or 3rd
6. Joe McKnight, Southern California
Highly touted playmaker at Southern California that was supposed to replace Reggie Bush, McKnight never quite lived up to the expectations. He is however an explosive back with breakaway type of speed. Has the capabilities to contribute in the return game, but overall, he'll be best utilized as a third down back.
Projected Round: 3rd or 4th
7. Toby Gerhart, Stanford
Highly productive runner in college, Gerhart finished second in the closest Heisman vote in history this past season. Has great vision and runs through a lot of tackles, but he won't make guys miss in open space. Might ultimately have to convert to fullback.
Projected Round: 3rd or 4th
8. Anthony Dixon, Mississippi
Big physical runner that has starting potential, but isn't the big play guy that most of the players ranked above him are. Patient runner that hits the hole hard, but won't run away from many defenders. At worse, he'll be a power back that converts short yardage situations.
Projected Round: 4th or 5th
9. Montario Hardesty, Tennessee
A down hill runner with good instincts, Hardesty will be an excellent fit for a team running the zone blocking scheme, which he excelled in last season under Lane Kiffin. He lacks upside and probably will only be an occasional spot starter, but he's a good pass blocker. That will help his draft stock on draft day.
Projected Round: 4th or 5th
10. Ben Tate, Auburn
Tate is a raw talent that will need coaching up at the next level. He lacks patience in allowing the hole to develop and he's also not very elusive. Still, you can see some intriguing upside that could get a team to jump on him a round earlier than most would project.
Projected Round: 4th
http://www.fantasyfootballjungle.com/articles/index.php?id=893