chibiabo
16 years ago
:magnifyglass: Based on the rather fruitless game at Tampa and the previous week against Dalls, it would appear that Mike McCarthy has a major problem on his hands. Way too many penalties both sides of the ball, way too little "O" line blocking, rather inadequate play-calling. and now the defense seems to be falling apart, not to mention an injured QB.
And the schedule isn't exactly GB friendly from here on either. Once again, perhaps it's time to scrap the ZB for this "O" line as they don't appear to be able to handle it very well. Way too slow most of the time and they never really look that sharp. Be interesting to see if this team can rebound. If not the Ted Thompson boo birds will have a field day!
blank
Packnic
16 years ago
Edited... no personal attacks allowed.
blank
zombieslayer
16 years ago
I think chibiabo had some honest criticisms:

1. Our OL sucks. Let's not sugar coat this nor bury our heads in the sand. This is something that needs to be addressed if we expect to win some Playoff games this year.

2. Which leads to the second part. Should we scrap the ZBS? It's not working for us.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago

I think chibiabo had some honest criticisms:

1. Our OL sucks. Let's not sugar coat this nor bury our heads in the sand. This is something that needs to be addressed if we expect to win some Playoff games this year.

2. Which leads to the second part. Should we scrap the ZBS? It's not working for us.

"zombieslayer" wrote:




If you mean scrap the ZBS for next year, it's not the worst idea in the world. If you're talking about this year, I'm not yet ready to admit defeat and start trying to re-tool anything. Let's let the group we expected to see starting get into a groove and see if they can improve. We're at .500 after four games w/ lots more football left to play.

But I think it's certainly reasonable to suggest that one big priority in the OS should be to examine the OL from top-to-bottom -- scheme, personnel, all of it. I'd like to actually be able to see how our young offensive backfield develops over the next few years, not watch them get butchered behind a porous line.
blank
Packnic
16 years ago

I think chibiabo had some honest criticisms:

1. Our OL sucks. Let's not sugar coat this nor bury our heads in the sand. This is something that needs to be addressed if we expect to win some Playoff games this year.

2. Which leads to the second part. Should we scrap the ZBS? It's not working for us.

"zombieslayer" wrote:




you mean like the exact freakin conversations we had last year about this time. About how badly the OL sucked. About how it was time to scrap the ZBS. these are not honest criticisms, they are rehashed whining from last year... you know the year we ended up in the NFC championship game.

I understand this team isn't perfect. but we arent the worst team in football, we don't need to scrap anything yet... and we damn sure arent out of the playoffs in week 4.

Everyone just breath.
blank
Packnic
16 years ago

I think chibiabo had some honest criticisms:

1. Our OL sucks. Let's not sugar coat this nor bury our heads in the sand. This is something that needs to be addressed if we expect to win some Playoff games this year.

2. Which leads to the second part. Should we scrap the ZBS? It's not working for us.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




If you mean scrap the ZBS for next year, it's not the worst idea in the world. If you're talking about this year, I'm not yet ready to admit defeat and start trying to re-tool anything. Let's let the group we expected to see starting get into a groove and see if they can improve. We're at .500 after four games w/ lots more football left to play.

But I think it's certainly reasonable to suggest that one big priority in the OS should be to examine the OL from top-to-bottom -- scheme, personnel, all of it. I'd like to actually be able to see how our young offensive backfield develops over the next few years, not watch them get butchered behind a porous line.

"zombieslayer" wrote:




NOW thats an honest measured criticism. How bout we let the starters play a couple games together before we hang the coach on Oneida Street.
blank
Gravedigga
16 years ago
Edited.. no personal attacks allowed.
--------------------------------------------
UserPostedImage


A wise man once said
---------------------------------------------
You are weak, pathetic and immature..............I would have d
zombieslayer
16 years ago



If you mean scrap the ZBS for next year, it's not the worst idea in the world. If you're talking about this year, I'm not yet ready to admit defeat and start trying to re-tool anything. Let's let the group we expected to see starting get into a groove and see if they can improve. We're at .500 after four games w/ lots more football left to play.

But I think it's certainly reasonable to suggest that one big priority in the OS should be to examine the OL from top-to-bottom -- scheme, personnel, all of it. I'd like to actually be able to see how our young offensive backfield develops over the next few years, not watch them get butchered behind a porous line.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



I thought I wouldn't even have to imply that. I think everyone on this board is intelligent enough to know that you don't scrap a system mid-season, especially a system that requires an entirely different set of personnel.

So yes, wait until the off-season. It's not working for us. We probably don't have the coaching for the ZBS to work.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
ILikeThePackers39
16 years ago



If you mean scrap the ZBS for next year, it's not the worst idea in the world. If you're talking about this year, I'm not yet ready to admit defeat and start trying to re-tool anything. Let's let the group we expected to see starting get into a groove and see if they can improve. We're at .500 after four games w/ lots more football left to play.

But I think it's certainly reasonable to suggest that one big priority in the OS should be to examine the OL from top-to-bottom -- scheme, personnel, all of it. I'd like to actually be able to see how our young offensive backfield develops over the next few years, not watch them get butchered behind a porous line.

"zombieslayer" wrote:



I thought I wouldn't even have to imply that. I think everyone on this board is intelligent enough to know that you don't scrap a system mid-season, especially a system that requires an entirely different set of personnel.

So yes, wait until the off-season. It's not working for us. We probably don't have the coaching for the ZBS to work.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:




Hey, I realize you folks like to play rough with each other, but if you thought I was saying you were stupid you're wrong - not my style. I wasn't clear on your point, so I added that bit, and I do think we need to let the intended starters get a couple games under their belts to see what we've truly got at OL this year.

I don't do the flames, so in the future you can safely assume I'm not trying to run you down with any comment I might make.
blank
zombieslayer
16 years ago



Hey, I realize you folks like to play rough with each other, but if you thought I was saying you were stupid you're wrong - not my style. I wasn't clear on your point, so I added that bit, and I do think we need to let the intended starters get a couple games under their belts to see what we've truly got at OL this year.

I don't do the flames, so in the future you can safely assume I'm not trying to run you down with any comment I might make.

"ILikeThePackers39" wrote:



Heh. No, not at all.

I was actually giving some credit to the level of posters on this board. I hope I didn't do it in a condescending way. If so, I apologize.

I have learned so much from people on this board. I thought I knew football, but there are so many people here who know it better than I do. That's why I write accordingly. I don't want to sound stupid.
My man Donald Driver
UserPostedImage
(thanks to Pack93z for the pic)
2010 will be seen as the beginning of the new Packers dynasty. 🇹🇹 🇲🇲 🇦🇷
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    Zero2Cool (54m) : Johnson didn't make it until 2020. Ring 2023. 🤷 Personally, he should have been in years prior to Hall.
    Zero2Cool (55m) : HUMP DAY
    beast (1h) : Guys that have a good shot at making the NFL Hall of Fame usually get into their teams pretty fast
    beast (1h) : Yeah, but is Kampman and the others in the NFL Hall of Fame?
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Johnson was Hall of Fame, 2020. Should haev been in Ring a year later, not three years.
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I could be wrong there though
    Zero2Cool (1h) : Guys like Kampman, Tim Harris, Al Harris, etc all over 15 years. Hall of Fame is 5 year wait
    Zero2Cool (1h) : I guess I see players in Packers Hall come way later
    beast (1h) : Yeah, usually teams hall of fames are a much lower bar than the NFL
    Zero2Cool (1h) : is it uncommon for Hall before Ring?
    Zero2Cool (1h) : S Xavier McKinney named first-team All-Pro by NFLPA
    beast (3h) : I missed it, sorry, but he got into the NFL Hall of Fame years before that
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Jones took his sweet ole time!
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Yeah, he's in the ring of honor, just saw video and his name is up there
    Zero2Cool (3h) : Didn't they have a thing in 2023 for Jimmy's ring of honor? I swear I saw it
    beast (3h) : Though if they're legitimately trying to re-sign MM, then it makes sense.
    beast (3h) : Jerry Jones still hasn't put Jimmy Johnson in the Ring of Honor, but he's in the NFL's Hall of Fame, Jones is petty
    Mucky Tundra (15h) : Unless the Cowboys are planning an extension, seems kinda petty
    beast (17h) : Cowboys denied Bears request
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : From what I'm reading, MM is under contract through the 14th of January; after that he's free game
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : McCarthy let go or not extended??
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Chicago Bears have asked the Dallas Cowboys permission to interview Mike McCarthy for head coaching vacancy
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : The winners page that is
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I was not hoping for that. It messes up the page lol
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3.
    beast (6-Jan) : Thank you, and I was really opening we were going to get 4 or more tied for the top 3
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats beast on 2024 !
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : congrats porky on winning 2023 pick'em! (oops sorry)
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Packers have $60M+ of 2025 cap space on paper TODAY.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Missed FG into a Lions TD; that'll do pig, that'll do
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : That might be it for the Vikings
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Oh so the refs do know what intentional grounding is
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : what the hell was that Goff?! Not much pressure and he just air mails it to Harrison
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : They really need to to get rid of the auto first down for illegal contact
    Martha Careful (6-Jan) : watching the Vikings and Lions it's understandable why they swept the Packers. So much better product
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Even when GB got pressure he was throwing darts; vs no pressure on that last pass he just air mails an open guy
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : didn't have guys in his face ... pressure makes difference
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Where was this Darnold vs GB?
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : BALL DON'T LIE
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : how was that not a safety? Goff throws it at an offensive lineman
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero, I thought that was a given! ;)
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : Zero I looked through earlier and noticed the same thing. Bonkers year. I just wonder if beast put any money on games
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : I'm hoping for BLOODBATH. Pummel one another.
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 8 people in pick'em would have won any year with their total lol
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : I'm rooting for the Lions to lose.
    Mucky Tundra (6-Jan) : God help me but I'm rooting for the Vikings to...Vikings to...Christ I can't say it
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : 4 td for Rodgers
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Chiefs got shutout
    Zero2Cool (6-Jan) : Rodgers passes for 3rd TD. might be last game of an amazing career
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    Recent Topics
    5h / Green Bay Packers Talk / go.pack.go.

    14h / Around The NFL / beast

    7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / wpr

    7-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    7-Jan / Fantasy Sports Talk / Zero2Cool

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

    6-Jan / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

    6-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    5-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / buckeyepackfan

    3-Jan / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.