Cheesey
6 years ago

cherry or lint

Originally Posted by: wpr 



Crap....I was hoping honey lemon.

Although lint flavored sounds interesting!
UserPostedImage
Pack93z
6 years ago
The house is very unassuming... but that isn't a shock as this is Conservy Ted we are talking about... Right now I am spending 65 to 70 percent of my time in Texas... hot right now, but no bugs and low humidity. But January was nice to be down here... for sure.


*** I have another .73 cents for the fund.. my right pocket. 😉
"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"
Cheesey
6 years ago
Whooo hooooo!!!!
I’m on my way to owning Teds house!!!
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago
Kinda neat to see the home someone has chosen. The home also comes off modest which is what I would expect from Thompson.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

Kinda neat to see the home someone has chosen. The home also comes off modest which is what I would expect from Thompson.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



So he's asking for $499,900 for a modest 2,113-square foot house? Seems kinda pricey, unless that whole area (or maybe on the River) is more costly or something. It doesn't say when he bought it, but cost him $317,000.


Also according to this, on June 21, 2018, Mark Murphy's De Pere home is also for sale. (Just pictures)
https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/picture-gallery/sports/nfl/packers/2018/06/21/mark-murphys-de-pere-home-for-sale/36251151/ 


And here is the same for Nelson's house
https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/picture-gallery/sports/nfl/packers/2018/06/18/take-a-look-inside-jordy-nelsons-house-in-suamico/36142673/ 
UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
6 years ago

So he's asking for $499,900 for a modest 2,113-square foot house? Seems kinda pricey, unless that whole area (or maybe on the River) is more costly or something. It doesn't say when he bought it, but cost him $317,000.

Originally Posted by: beast 



I give my opinion based off a few pictures and this is the shit I come back to read in reply? I'll just find something else, thanks.
UserPostedImage
Cheesey
6 years ago

I give my opinion based off a few pictures and this is the shit I come back to read in reply? I'll just find something else, thanks.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



And you were expecting a different reply from you-know-who???

Some posters are very consistent. You don’t even have to read it to know what to expect.

River or lake property has sky rocketed in price in recent years. In fact, all housing has. An example is the home my parents built in 1960. A two story 4 bedroom home with a 2 and a half car garage. It cost them 20 grand. When my mom died in 1990, it sold for 70 grand. Now it’s valued at somewhere around 130 grand. And it’s not on the water.
Who can blame someone for trying to get the most value out of property they are trying to sell? (I know who.LOL!)
It’s the asking price. Doesn’t mean he will get it.
I would be interested at what other homes in his area are selling for. That would be more telling as to if he is out of line for asking that much.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

I give my opinion based off a few pictures and this is the shit I come back to read in reply? I'll just find something else, thanks.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



A couple of people gave similar opinions... and all I said was it seems kinda pricey so I don't know what's got you cussing about.... and compared to my area that is pricey for that little. Around here, I've seen people get almost twice as much for almost half that price.

Sorry if talking price is considered shit.

Edit: Wait, did you think I was complaining about your comment? Because I was NOT!. I agree with you and others than it looks modest... I was just trying to figure out why a modest house was listed at a non-modest price. I was attempting to add on, not attack your comments...

This just came to me, because there have been a couple of times when you have thought I was attacking your comments when I have not been, and you're comments make much more sense to me in that context, which is why I'm asking and trying to figure out what upset you.
UserPostedImage
beast
6 years ago

And you were expecting a different reply from you-know-who???

Some posters are very consistent. You don’t even have to read it to know what to expect.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

Yes you're consistently taking subtle digs, so you can pretend to be the innocent victim later on, you start the shit, and then cry like a bitch when someone hits back. Just because you attempted to state a lot of wrong facts and I corrected you, you're still holding a fucking grudge, grow some testicles and get over it already.

River or lake property has sky rocketed in price in recent years. In fact, all housing has. An example is the home my parents built in 1960. A two story 4 bedroom home with a 2 and a half car garage. It cost them 20 grand. When my mom died in 1990, it sold for 70 grand. Now it’s valued at somewhere around 130 grand. And it’s not on the water.
Who can blame someone for trying to get the most value out of property they are trying to sell? (I know who.LOL!)
It’s the asking price. Doesn’t mean he will get it.
I would be interested at what other homes in his area are selling for. That would be more telling as to if he is out of line for asking that much.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 

Thank you for making the exact same points I was trying to make. That the pricey is a sky rocketed price based on past years and wondering what other homes in the area go for.

Yet you had to stupidly throw shots in because you too sensitive and still butt hurt because I pointed out you were saying stupid shit.... like Ringo is the best NT the Packers have and Clark should be starting in the 5 tech. You don't understand interior linemen, a lot of people don't, so get the hell over it already!
UserPostedImage
isocleas2
6 years ago
There's an old saying about water front property "they're not making more of it". I have some family that live a little farther down the river and they've done alright with their property as well. I think exclusive properties or anything in demand by the wealthy is doing pretty well right now. Its partly why sports teams are getting insane valuations in the billions. The filthy rich only have so many places to put their money 😊

Besides being on the water teds place is not far from St Norbert college and a short walk/drive from downtown depere. Some good restaurants down there ran into Ted once at Pasquales on main st, bartender said he came in most Fridays. Was a nice guy didn't mind talking to whoever approached him.

I think his place will sell quickly.
Fan Shout
beast (1m) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (2m) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (12m) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (24m) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (33m) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (54m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (1h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (1h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (2h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (2h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (2h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (2h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (2h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (4h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (4h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (5h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (5h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (5h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (5h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (5h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (5h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (5h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (7h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (9h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (18h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
23m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

51m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.