beast
7 years ago

That's what I thought too. If it is McCarthy I would take the tweet as a jab at the "I'm a highly successful coach" remark he made a while back.

I wonder how much arguing would be going on if someone else had made the post.

Originally Posted by: sschind 


That's assuming Greg Gabriel wants to leak who it is, which he doesn't seem to be wanting to do.


If it's true (which we don't know) it could be anyone... including the two head coaches which have active rumors about them possible wanting out (Saints and Cardinals)... I just don't understand why limit it to a single guy.

Why Gabriel is mainly a Bears guy now, he's longest run was with Giants who has a head coach that doesn't seem to be happy.

It could be MM, it could be just about any coach....
Hell it could be Dom Capers or Vic Fangio.

Why limit it to a single person when it could be any NFL coach?
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
Almost nil that it's anyone but a HC. To cite it's not John Fox pretty much proves he was referring to head coaches. He covers the Bears... not very far from Green Bay. Seemed likely he could be taking a shot at MM. Never said it was definitely MM, I don't know. Again, it's worthy of a topic as it very well could be MM...I think many are trying to purposely deflect from the possibility it's him but make no mistake it very well could be him as well as some other HC's out there.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


beast
7 years ago

Almost nil that it's anyone but a HC. To cite it's not John Fox pretty much proves he was referring to head coaches. He covers the Bears... not very far from Green Bay. Seemed likely he could be taking a shot at MM. Never said it was definitely MM, I don't know. Again, it's worthy of a topic as it very well could be MM...I think many are trying to purposely deflect from the possibility it's him but make no mistake it very well could be him as well as some other HC's out there.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 


But mostly covers the Bears but he covers any and all teams, including him taking shots at John Elway for the Broncos, so he covers all NFL teams when he has something to say.

Yes it's worthy of a topic as it could be any coach, including Mike McCarthy... but as far as we know he could be talking about the Chuck Pagano feels it times for a change, as he probably knows he's gonna get fired very soon anyways. We just don't know, because he hasn't given us enough info.


UserPostedImage
Zero2Cool
7 years ago
Sure sounds like a man who wants out of town.

I’m so blessed, and Jessica just does such an incredible job of making everything work, because this is such a selfish profession with the time commitment. But being in this town is extremely beneficial. The boys are in high school right up the road, the girls are right in De Pere. They have tennis today at 3:30, so I’m going to get to see them play tennis on a Friday. I don’t know if you get to do that in any other city in the NFL.

Mike McCarthy wrote:


UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
7 years ago

Sure sounds like a man who wants out of town.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Thats just "coach speak"!
😂😂😂😂😂
Who are you gonna believe.
Mike or some blogger writing shit just for "click bait"?

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
7 years ago
Yeah, no coach has ever feigned or fabricated anything.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Zero2Cool
7 years ago

Yeah, no coach has ever feigned or fabricated anything.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 

I'm sure when an interview goes into talking about a deceased brother is the exact time a coach would lie, too.

UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
7 years ago
There's a thread on that. This is about a coach talking about being happy where he is. Couldn't be much different questions.

I don't know that you should expect total transparency on an issue so deeply personal, either.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DoddPower
7 years ago

Okay, if it was Mike, why spend all the money he just did on adding on to his home? Do you think he's gonna coach some where else and leave his family behind? I guess that's possible, but I don't think Jessica would buy into that. Or do you think maybe Mike just wants to find a different career? Do you think Mike wants to coach another QB other than Aaron Rodgers?

Mike being the coach wanting out just doesn't make sense at all. We can blast Ted all we want, but we know (based on indications) his time is coming to end.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



As long as he's checked comps, he could be fixing up the house to make it sell faster, and might even make some profit when all is said and done. That doesn't really mean anything one way or the other, imo.

I personally hope he does really want out. Average-to-good coach, but there are coaches out there that could do more with Aaron Rodgers. Plus McCarthy has gotten stale. Time for everyone to move on.
buckeyepackfan
7 years ago

As long as he's checked comps, he could be fixing up the house to make it sell faster, and might even make some profit when all is said and done. That doesn't really mean anything one way or the other, imo.

I personally hope he does really want out. Average-to-good coach, but there are coaches out there that could do more with Aaron Rodgers. Plus McCarthy has gotten stale. Time for everyone to move on.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



I always here there's better out there.
Who?
I have no problem with it.
Mike goes, very good chance the whole staff goes.
I think Mike has put together a pretty Damn good staff.
Steelers, Patriots, Packers.
What do they all have in common?

Other than posting winning records almost every year, they all have very strong, stable programs.
Some of the members want to blow the whole thing up, fine with me.
Be prepared for a few years of losing football and hope the guys they bring in know what they are doing.
I've said it before, small part of me wants it to happen .
I want to see how the ones who have been complaining the most react when it doesn't go well at first.
They will be exposed for what they are.


I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (13m) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (22m) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (33m) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (1h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (1h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (1h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (1h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (3h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (3h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (4h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (4h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (4h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (4h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (4h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (4h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (4h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (4h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (4h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (4h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (4h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (4h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (5h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (5h) : Packers will get in
beast (5h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (5h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (5h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (8h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (8h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (8h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (18h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (18h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (21h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
10m / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.