uffda udfa
9 years ago

We finally found out why Clay Matthews was on the sidelines while the defense was hemorrhaging late in the NFC...

Michael Rodney  wrote:


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


Zero2Cool
9 years ago
... and now we know why Kevin Greene "retired" from coaching Outside Linebackers for the Green Bay Packers. Major, MAJOR conflicts of personalities right there. Greene is live and die team first and Clay Matthews III is "take care of number one".
UserPostedImage
buckeyepackfan
9 years ago
Sore knees?

Or just no desire to participate in preseason?

So much for veteran leadership from Clay.

EDIT:

Second thought not going to over react until Clay talks with the Packers beat reporters.

Not that I don't believe him, but the guy does work for ESPN, the network that likes to create news stories instead of just reporting the latest news.

As far a trading for Jimmy Graham
😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄

Here I thought Uffda had actually posted a story that we all could discuss.
Didn't take long to see his motivation.
Looking forward to another week of Ted bashing and 1000 New reasons Jimmy Graham would solve Uffda's self conceived TE problems.
I'm out of this one, like an old rerun of Bonanza, seen it too many of times.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
StoicFire
9 years ago
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't think this should necessarily be a big deal. I mean, the author of the article was OK with the entire quote until the last phrase.

"...it was a bunch of things catching up to me. That’s what I’ve said since the game. It was a bunch of little things. It was knee. It was hip. I took that hit on the sack in which I had. I had a big hit on the tight end coming across the middle. It was a bunch of little stuff and that point, I didn’t feel confident putting myself out there. I had to do what’s in the best interests of not only the team..."

The way I see it he was just reiterating what he had already said. Lots of little things made him feel that he should take time to recover. I know that a lot of people may view that as selfish, but it depends on how exactly he felt and we the fans simply can't know that. The athlete knows his body better than anyone else, and if he thought he wasn't fit to be on the line, or that by lining up and playing he would actually be a hindrance to the team, then I'm fine with him making that call. If he was being a baby or just making excuses then I would be pretty damn disappointed, but I don't think I have enough information to condemn him at this point so I wont.


"the Quarterback can run if he wants to, but with this rocket attached to your body... who would?" -Aaron Rodgers
uffda udfa
9 years ago
In a TEAM game, you don't talk about what's best for YOU. Yeah, maybe, off the field in a contract situation but NEVER on it and especially when a SuperBowl is on the line.

He's tarnished. I would love to see him dealt out of Green Bay. He's a heckuva nice guy off the field but this is too much for me and my tastes.

Man, we should've dealt him for Jimmy Graham. 🙂 Cure two problems...get rid of an egomaniac and add a star TE.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


gotarace
9 years ago
Hope it wasn't a Jay Cutler tap out...That Seattle loss is still a tough pill to choke down.
Smart As a Horse
Hung Like Einstein
musccy
9 years ago
This is pretty tough to spin in a positive light, and as you said Buckeye, if he's willing to take himself out for a booboo on his knee minutes from the SB, it makes you wonder how bad his knee, hamstring, etc. Have been.
nerdmann
9 years ago

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't think this should necessarily be a big deal. I mean, the author of the article was OK with the entire quote until the last phrase.

"...it was a bunch of things catching up to me. That’s what I’ve said since the game. It was a bunch of little things. It was knee. It was hip. I took that hit on the sack in which I had. I had a big hit on the tight end coming across the middle. It was a bunch of little stuff and that point, I didn’t feel confident putting myself out there. I had to do what’s in the best interests of not only the team..."

The way I see it he was just reiterating what he had already said. Lots of little things made him feel that he should take time to recover. I know that a lot of people may view that as selfish, but it depends on how exactly he felt and we the fans simply can't know that. The athlete knows his body better than anyone else, and if he thought he wasn't fit to be on the line, or that by lining up and playing he would actually be a hindrance to the team, then I'm fine with him making that call. If he was being a baby or just making excuses then I would be pretty damn disappointed, but I don't think I have enough information to condemn him at this point so I wont.

Originally Posted by: StoicFire 



For me the question is, did he take himself out in crunch time to get back at the coaches for making him play ILB? Because if so, we don't need him.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
musccy
9 years ago

For me the question is, did he take himself out in crunch time to get back at the coaches for making him play ILB? Because if so, we don't need him.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



He had about 11 million reasons to stop being a bitch and play whatever the F the Packers wanted him to play last year.

I don't want to completely give up on the guy, but that comment is inexcusable. Sack up and play when your team needs you.
steveishere
9 years ago
I think its bull. He had a concussion and they arent saying anything about it because he went back in the game after it happened. When he collided with their TE on a play he looked KO.
Fan Shout
packerfanoutwest (59m) : Inactives tonight for the Pack: Alexander- knee Bullard - ankle Williams - quad Walker -ankle Monk Heath
packerfanoutwest (1h) : No Jaire, but hopefully the front 7 destroys the line of scrimmage & forces Rattler into a few passes to McKinney.
packerfanoutwest (1h) : minny could be #1 seed and the Lions #5 seed
Zero2Cool (3h) : We'd have same Division and Conference records. Strength of schedule we edge them
Zero2Cool (3h) : I just checked. What tie breaker?
bboystyle (3h) : yes its possible but unlikely. If we do get the 5th, we face the NFCS winner
Zero2Cool (3h) : Ahh, ok.
bboystyle (3h) : yes due to tie breaker
Zero2Cool (3h) : I mean, unlikely, yes, but mathematically, 5th is possible by what I'm reading.
Zero2Cool (3h) : If Vikings lose out, Packers win out, Packers get 5th, right?
bboystyle (3h) : Minny isnt going to lose out so 5th seed is out of the equation. We are playing for the 6th or 7th seed which makes no difference
Mucky Tundra (4h) : beast, the ad revenue goes to the broadcast company but they gotta pay to air the game on their channel/network
beast (5h) : If we win tonight the game is still relative in terms of 5th, 6th or 7th seed... win and it's 5th or 6th, lose and it's 6th or 7th
beast (5h) : Mucky, I thought the ad revenue went to the broadcasting companies or the NFL, at least not directly
Zero2Cool (5h) : I think the revenue share is moot, isn't it? That's the CBA an Salary Cap handling that.
bboystyle (5h) : i mean game becomes irrelevant if we win tonight. Just a game where we are trying to play spoilers to Vikings chance at the #1 seed
Mucky Tundra (5h) : beast, I would guess ad revenue from more eyes watching tv
Zero2Cool (6h) : I would think it would hurt the home team because people would have to cancel last minute maybe? i dunno
beast (6h) : I agree that it's BS for fans planning on going to the game. But how does it bring in more money? I'm guessing indirectly?
packerfanoutwest (6h) : bs on flexing the game....they do it for the $$league$$, not the hometown fans
Zero2Cool (7h) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (7h) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (7h) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (7h) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (7h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (8h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (8h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (9h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (9h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (10h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (10h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (10h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (10h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (10h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (10h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (10h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (10h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (10h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (10h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (10h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (10h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (10h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (10h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (10h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (10h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (10h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

3h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

9h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.