buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

Don't worry, I fully understand coach speak. I fully understand players don't say anything negative to regarding teammates. I also know you can listen to what isn't said or look at the context the comment was given in before completely dismissing it.

I also know you quote player and coach words as if they were gospel in your "arguments" when they support your position, and dismiss them out of hand them when they don't.

You certainly are magnanimous in your self appointed mission to rescue this board from all us dumb homers with your special brand of "truth." Get over yourself.



Let me guess. Teddy pulled your credentials, so now he is the anti-Christ.



Originally Posted by: greengold 



Easy greengold, Uffda just trying to educate you and others from an angle you would never be able to understand.
(sarcasm)
I say you and others because I have been in the business for 20 plus years.

The 1st THING I always tell my new people is when going for a story, ask stupid questions and you will get stupid answers, ask incredibly stupid questions and you will be shown the door!
Someone learned that lesson the hard way!
😄😄😄😄😄

Back on topic, I like what I am hearing so far, not only with Adams, but just the overall crispness of the practices.
Seems this team is focused from top to bottom to make the coming year something special.
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Easy greengold, Uffda just trying to educate you and others from an angle you would never be able to understand.
(sarcasm)
I say you and others because I have been in the business for 20 plus years.

The 1st THING I always tell my new people is when going for a story, ask stupid questions and you will get stupid answers, ask incredibly stupid questions and you will be shown the door!
Someone learned that lesson the hard way!
😄😄😄😄😄

Back on topic, I like what I am hearing so far, not only with Adams, but just the overall crispness of the practices.
Seems this team is focused from top to bottom to make the coming year something special.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Small pond thinking is always a delight.

Let's start talking some numbers. If Davante is truly this star we keep hearing he is he will obviously have a much better season than he had last year when he was anything but a star. He didn't even look like a star in the making to me whereas Randall, Greg, Javon, etc. surely did.

What are your expectations based off what you've READ because you haven't seen anything but quotes.

Tell me what is going to prove to you that all this hype is warranted? I say nothing less than 70 receptions with an average reception of 14 or more. That puts him to very close to a thousand yard season at 14.0 per grab. Throw in 8 or more TD's, too. Hey, the kid's a star...Randall didn't get this much love from Rodgers back then and he didn't even get it in the recent quote that spoke to Woodson, Peppers, and Greg Jennings have that confidence that Davante has. Oh, but Rodgers did say when all was said and done RC18 would be Ted Thompson's best draft pick. I guess Aaron was dissing himself because he's such an accurate gauge when he gives quotes?

BTW, I left the business when I learned the only places for me to go to grow were NY and LA. I didn't want to live in either city. Was never fired from anywhere. The Best Damn Sports Show was the last place to seriously pursue me and I did some work for BEYOND THE GLORY there at Fox from my home because I didn't want to live there. I probably got to work directly with one of Buck's heroes...Pete Rose. It is a different world, Buck, or maybe not in Lima?





UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


buckeyepackfan
9 years ago

Small pond thinking is always a delight.

Let's start talking some numbers. If Davante is truly this star we keep hearing he is he will obviously have a much better season than he had last year when he was anything but a star. He didn't even look like a star in the making to me whereas Randall, Greg, Javon, etc. surely did.

What are your expectations based off what you've READ because you haven't seen anything but quotes.

Tell me what is going to prove to you that all this hype is warranted? I say nothing less than 70 receptions with an average reception of 14 or more. That puts him to very close to a thousand yard season at 14.0 per grab. Throw in 8 or more TD's, too. Hey, the kid's a star...Randall didn't get this much love from Rodgers back then and he didn't even get it in the recent quote that spoke to Woodson, Peppers, and Greg Jennings have that confidence that Davante has. Oh, but Rodgers did say when all was said and done RC18 would be Ted Thompson's best draft pick. I guess Aaron was dissing himself because he's such an accurate gauge when he gives quotes?

BTW, I left the business when I learned the only places for me to go to grow were NY and LA. I didn't want to live in either city. Was never fired from anywhere. The Best Damn Sports Show was the last place to seriously pursue me and I did some work for BEYOND THE GLORY there at Fox from my home because I didn't want to live there. I probably got to work directly with one of Buck's heroes...Pete Rose. It is a different world, Buck, or maybe not in Lima?




Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Dude nobody cares.

HOOK, LINE, and SINKER!
😄😄😄😄😄😄
I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!
uffda udfa
9 years ago

Dude nobody cares.

HOOK, LINE, and SINKER!
😄😄😄😄😄😄

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan 



Nobody cares about Davante's stats? Why not? He should outdo what he did this year by leaps and bounds.

Oh, if you're referring to me, I don't care either. I am curious, though... Are you a Pete Rose fan?




UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
9 years ago

Amen, wideside! Oh, and that 5th rounder was one we traded up for!

I just wish these crazy hype trains would get derailed. It's one thing if you actually believe it based on what you've seen and completely different if you're getting all hyped up from reading quotes.

Real football...soon!

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Crazy hype trains?

Unlike your love for Janis, which is completely rational.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
nerdmann
9 years ago


Tell me what is going to prove to you that all this hype is warranted? I say nothing less than 70 receptions with an average reception of 14 or more. That puts him to very close to a thousand yard season at 14.0 per grab. Throw in 8 or more TD's, too. Hey, the kid's a star...

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I'll take some of that action.

The only thing that will get in his way of those numbers is sharing the ball with Jordy, Cobb, Richard Rodgers, Eddie Lacy and whoever emerges.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I'll take some of that action.

The only thing that will get in his way of those numbers is sharing the ball with Jordy, Cobb, Richard Rodgers, Eddie Lacy and whoever emerges.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



That's an excuse right there. He's already sharing the ball with those guys to begin with...did last year. The one who emerges absolutely has to be Davante, right? He's the star. If anyone besides him emerges then Davante is NOT a star.

I think he should hit AT LEAST 70 receptions...that is a ground floor. 8 TD's and 900+ yards. He's a STAR. MVP of OTA's...Aaron has put him in the Peppers, Woodson, Greg Jennings category.

Crazy hype train on Janis? No. I haven't a clue if the kid will catch one ball for us this year or more than Davante...I just KNOW he has more attributes to him than Davante and should be a better player if he gets it.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
9 years ago

That's an excuse right there. He's already sharing the ball with those guys to begin with...did last year. The one who emerges absolutely has to be Davante, right? He's the star. If anyone besides him emerges then Davante is NOT a star.

I think he should hit AT LEAST 70 receptions...that is a ground floor. 8 TD's and 900+ yards. He's a STAR. MVP of OTA's...Aaron has put him in the Peppers, Woodson, Greg Jennings category.

Crazy hype train on Janis? No. I haven't a clue if the kid will catch one ball for us this year or more than Davante...I just KNOW he has more attributes to him than Davante and should be a better player if he gets it.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



I see you're trying to weasel out of it already.

How about this: let's compare Janis's numbers to Adams'.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
uffda udfa
9 years ago

I see you're trying to weasel out of it already.

How about this: let's compare Janis's numbers to Adams'.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



I'm the one weaseling? How so? You're the one who qualified the deal by saying unless someone else emerges???? How could anyone emerge with a star like Davante there? It is you who is backing off. A star is a star... what is Richard Freaking Rodgers or Andrew Quarless going to emerge? OR...Do you fear Janis! 🤣

Ha ha...yes, let's compare a guy who got to play in garbage time and got 2 receptions to the high draft pick who got to play all year. Sounds fair.


UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


nerdmann
9 years ago

I'm the one weaseling? How so? You're the one who qualified the deal by saying unless someone else emerges???? How could anyone emerge with a star like Davante there? It is you who is backing off. A star is a star... what is Richard Freaking Rodgers or Andrew Quarless going to emerge? OR...Do you fear Janis! 🤣

Ha ha...yes, let's compare a guy who got to play in garbage time and got 2 receptions to the high draft pick who got to play all year. Sounds fair.

Originally Posted by: uffda udfa 



Where did I qualify anything? What I said was IF he doesn't get it, that will be why, not because of shit suckage on his part.

In fact, YOU are the one who is qualifying, by saying Davante only gets to play because of his draft status. So yeah, didn't think you'd stand behind what you said.
“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Fan Shout
Zero2Cool (2m) : I see what you did there Mucky
Zero2Cool (2m) : dammit. 3:25pm
Zero2Cool (2m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm
Mucky Tundra (10m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground
Mucky Tundra (11m) : Yeah baby!
Zero2Cool (31m) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah
Zero2Cool (1h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.
beast (1h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue
Zero2Cool (2h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's
Zero2Cool (2h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.
packerfanoutwest (2h) : ok I stand corrected
Zero2Cool (2h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th
Zero2Cool (2h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?
beast (2h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.
beast (2h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out
Zero2Cool (2h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.
beast (2h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games
beast (2h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality
beast (2h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs
Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread
Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't
Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.
Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what
Zero2Cool (3h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in
packerfanoutwest (3h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker
packerfanoutwest (3h) : if bucs win out they win their division
beast (3h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us
packerfanoutwest (3h) : falcons are already ahead of us
beast (3h) : Packers will get in
beast (3h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen
packerfanoutwest (3h) : they still are in the playoffs
packerfanoutwest (3h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7
Zero2Cool (5h) : We can say it. We don't play.
Mucky Tundra (6h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints
Mucky Tundra (6h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games
Mucky Tundra (6h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.
buckeyepackfan (7h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.
Mucky Tundra (16h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan
beast (16h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings
bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses
Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch
buckeyepackfan (20h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks
Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.
Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2024 Packers Schedule
Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
Eagles
Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
COLTS
Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
Titans
Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
Rams
Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
CARDINALS
Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
TEXANS
Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
Jaguars
Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
Bears
Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
49ERS
Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
DOLPHINS
Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
Seahawks
Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
SAINTS
Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
Vikings
Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM
BEARS
Recent Topics
1h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

1h / Random Babble / Martha Careful

2h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

22-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / packerfanoutwest

19-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

19-Dec / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

18-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

17-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

17-Dec / Featured Content / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

16-Dec / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Mucky Tundra

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

16-Dec / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.