Zero2Cool
10 years ago
Of course this holds absolutely no impact on the upcoming game Sunday. That said, the Packers have played in seven Conference Championship games dating back to 1966 winning five of them and losing two. 


2010	W		@	Chicago Bears		21	14
2007	L	OT		New York Giants		20	23
1997	W		@	San Francisco 49ers	23	10
1996	W			Carolina Panthers	30	13
1995	L		@	Dallas Cowboys		27	38
1967	W			Dallas Cowboys		21	17
1966	W		@	Dallas Cowboys		34	27


Other than the obvious they scored less points than the opponent, the only consistent factor between the two losses versus five wins is when they tied or won the turnover battle, they won each game. The two games they lost, they had more turnovers than their opponent.

The same will hold true this Sunday. If the Packers win the turn over margin, they will win the game.
UserPostedImage
+1
TheKanataThrilla
10 years ago
When we lost in 2007 wasn't it the night game? We won the afternoon game in 2011. Maybe that will be a better as it looks like the Seahawks play better at night games based on their schedule. Their losses were all early games at 1pm or Noon.
Zero2Cool
10 years ago
Curious observation there ...

Packers four losses, two were at noon, the other two were evening matches.

Seahawks four losses had a kickoff at noon or 1pm.
UserPostedImage
PackFanWithTwins
10 years ago
W,W,L,W,W,L,W

If you look at trends, we should win this time.
The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!
+2
luigis
10 years ago
When the last digit of the season is 5 or 7 we lose. So we are going to win this one.
Luis
Rockmolder
10 years ago

Of course this holds absolutely no impact on the upcoming game Sunday. That said, the Packers have played in seven Conference Championship games dating back to 1966 winning five of them and losing two. 


2011	W		@	Chicago Bears		21	14
2007	L	OT		New York Giants		20	23
1997	W		@	San Francisco 49ers	23	10
1996	W			Carolina Panthers	30	13
1995	L		@	Dallas Cowboys		27	38
1967	W			Dallas Cowboys		21	17
1966	W		@	Dallas Cowboys		34	27


Other than the obvious they scored less points than the opponent, the only consistent factor between the two losses versus five wins is when they tied or won the turnover battle, they won each game. The two games they lost, they had more turnovers than their opponent.

The same will hold true this Sunday. If the Packers win the turn over margin, they will win the game.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



I wasn't watching the Pack back in '95, so I don't really know about that game, but that 2007 NFCC game... It felt like we had 20 turnovers that day. Could've taken that game so easily... Especially after Tynes nearly handed it to us. Would've been totally different had Favre gone out in a better way than that, I reckon.
rabidgopher04
10 years ago

I wasn't watching the Pack back in '95, so I don't really know about that game, but that 2007 NFCC game... It felt like we had 20 turnovers that day. Could've taken that game so easily... Especially after Tynes nearly handed it to us. Would've been totally different had Favre gone out in a better way than that, I reckon.

Originally Posted by: Rockmolder 



I remember watching it. We were winning the 1995 game until Favre threw 2 interceptions and screwed the pooch. I distinctly remember that game and when it was over, I was upset, but I knew without a doubt that the Packers would win SB XXXI the next year.
Amazing Bacon Delivery  Service! Never be without good bacon again.
Cheesey
10 years ago
I was at that 1995 championship game. My wife sent me down to Dallas as a surprise gift for me.
I really thought we would win. Then the one Packer coach got hurt bad, and it seemed to go downhill from there.
UserPostedImage
mi_keys
10 years ago

I was at that 1995 championship game. My wife sent me down to Dallas as a surprise gift for me.
I really thought we would win. Then the one Packer coach got hurt bad, and it seemed to go downhill from there.

Originally Posted by: Cheesey 



Fritz Shurmur. Some Cowboy ran into him, knocking him over, and he struck his head hard on that lightly carpeted concrete surface they called a field.
Born and bred a cheesehead
mi_keys
10 years ago

Of course this holds absolutely no impact on the upcoming game Sunday. That said, the Packers have played in seven Conference Championship games dating back to 1966 winning five of them and losing two. 


2011	W		@	Chicago Bears		21	14
2007	L	OT		New York Giants		20	23
1997	W		@	San Francisco 49ers	23	10
1996	W			Carolina Panthers	30	13
1995	L		@	Dallas Cowboys		27	38
1967	W			Dallas Cowboys		21	17
1966	W		@	Dallas Cowboys		34	27


Other than the obvious they scored less points than the opponent, the only consistent factor between the two losses versus five wins is when they tied or won the turnover battle, they won each game. The two games they lost, they had more turnovers than their opponent.

The same will hold true this Sunday. If the Packers win the turn over margin, they will win the game.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



The Bears game was the 2010 season.
Born and bred a cheesehead
Similar Topics
Users browsing this topic
    Fan Shout
    dfosterf (4h) : Mackelvie
    dfosterf (4h) : Michael Macelvie- NFL teams know how to draft- Why don"t they?
    dfosterf (4h) : Youtube
    Zero2Cool (9h) : Packers were not selected for the 2025 Hall of Fame game.
    dfosterf (11h) : PFOW Out of our division would be a good thing imo
    Zero2Cool (13h) : Jameson Williams is done at 24 years old? What? He's a WR, not QB. I'm missing something here haha
    wpr (13h) : Tomorrow is almost here.
    packerfanoutwest (14h) : would you want him if Pack needed a back up qb?
    packerfanoutwest (14h) : JW is done......stick a fork in him
    Zero2Cool (15h) : You should. He goes to AFC that helps Packers.
    packerfanoutwest (23-Apr) : don't care
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Lions shopping Jameson Williams?
    packerfanoutwest (22-Apr) : Packers General Manager Brian Gutekunst says Green Bay’s roster can win, even without adding anyone in the draft.
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : It's a poor design. New site has SignalR like our gameday chat
    wpr (22-Apr) : Ah today's Shout was very quick to post.
    wpr (22-Apr) : now 3
    Zero2Cool (22-Apr) : Who? What?
    beast (22-Apr) : What is he supposed to say? He doesn't want players currently on the team?
    Martha Careful (21-Apr) : meh
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : Sounds like Walker and Wyatt will be with Packers for beyond 2026
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : It's so awesome.
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : new site fan shout post fast
    wpr (21-Apr) : Slow posting in Fan shout.
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    wpr (21-Apr) : Only 4
    Zero2Cool (21-Apr) : If only we had a topic to read about and discuss it. That's something new website must have!!!
    dfosterf (21-Apr) : Justice Musqueda over at Acme Packing put up an excellent synopsis of the Packers 1st round options this am
    wpr (19-Apr) : 5 days
    beast (18-Apr) : 6 days
    wpr (17-Apr) : 7 days
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.
    Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that
    dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?
    Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent
    Please sign in to use Fan Shout
    2024 Packers Schedule
    Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM
    Eagles
    29 - 34
    Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM
    COLTS
    16 - 10
    Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM
    Titans
    30 - 14
    Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM
    VIKINGS
    29 - 31
    Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM
    Rams
    24 - 19
    Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM
    CARDINALS
    34 - 13
    Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM
    TEXANS
    24 - 22
    Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM
    Jaguars
    30 - 27
    Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM
    LIONS
    14 - 24
    Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM
    Bears
    20 - 19
    Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM
    49ERS
    38 - 10
    Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM
    DOLPHINS
    30 - 17
    Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM
    Lions
    31 - 34
    Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM
    Seahawks
    30 - 13
    Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM
    SAINTS
    34 - 0
    Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM
    Vikings
    25 - 27
    Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM
    BEARS
    22 - 24
    Recent Topics
    4h / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    15h / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Apr / Packers Draft Threads / Zero2Cool

    22-Apr / Random Babble / Martha Careful

    22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    22-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

    17-Apr / Random Babble / wpr

    13-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Martha Careful

    12-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Zero2Cool

    11-Apr / Feedback, Suggestions and Issues / Rockmolder

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    2-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / bboystyle

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

    1-Apr / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

    31-Mar / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

    Headlines
    Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.