DoddPower
10 years ago

Thats what my thread is for. The offense,for the most part, is very average on the road. The defense did good but they played against a joke of an offense. Same as Buffalo.

Yea we won,but to not be concerned that our offense has stunk it up on the road 2 weeks in a row means you wearing them green and gold glasses. We can say Buffalo has a great defense so thats why we struggled. But whats the excuse for the Bucs game? That defense is horrid and yet our offense looked very out of sync and not lethal at all.

Originally Posted by: bboystyle 



Where exactly did I say I'm not concerned about the offense? I don't think I did. But if I didn't, I'll go ahead and say it now. I'm more concerned about the Packers defense in the playoffs than the Packers offense. I trust the best quarterback in the league, a very good running back, very good wide receivers, and an ascending offensive line over a defense that has repeatedly had its pants pulled down and spanked in the playoffs recently. Could the offense be better on the road? Absolutely. They always could. But I expect they will improve. They might not have to worry about that until the NFC Championship game anyway if they can beat the Lions. If the Packers can pull off a win against the Lions, the whole concern about the offense on the road isn't very important in the near future. The defense, however, will remain an issue, imo. Will they honestly be able to stop Tony Romo and Murray? The Falcons? The Lions? I think they can, but I don't trust them. They are very inconsistent, but I do think they are better than in recent years. But I'm not sure how much better.

I already stated the "excuse" for the Bucs game. I don't really think the Packers need any excuses. It was a nice win. But Rodgers recently had the flu and was playing with a hurt calf. Yet the Packers still moved the ball up and down the field and easily won. I really don't get the problem with that game. The Bills game was obviously a screw up. There are things to be concerned about, but will there ever be a time in which there are not? The Packers need to improve but all we can do is hope that they will. All of this is a moot point if they can't beat the Lions at home.
Zero2Cool
10 years ago

Unfortunately the Packers didn't match up all too well v. Seattle last time. With all this said, the team is playing for a 1st round bye on Sunday and this should be a MUCH higher priority than Seattle right now!

Originally Posted by: musccy 



Seahawks don't have Percy Harvin anymore. I equate that to playing the 49ers without Colin Kaepernick.
UserPostedImage
uffda udfa
10 years ago

Seahawks don't have Percy Harvin anymore. I equate that to playing the 49ers without Colin Kaepernick.

Originally Posted by: Zero2Cool 



Really? Harvin had 59 receiving yards and 41 rushing yards vs. us Week 1.

The main issue we have is their defense... that's playing as well as it ever has.
UserPostedImage
Ted Thompson sits on his hands per former GM: "because they’ve had 25 fricking years of great quarterbacks. Of course it works. Try it without a special quarterback."


DarkaneRules
10 years ago
That linebacker Bobby Wagner is holy shit worthy. He is definitely one of my favorite players in the league.
Circular Arguments: They are a heck of an annoyance
nerdmann
10 years ago

Where exactly did I say I'm not concerned about the offense? I don't think I did. But if I didn't, I'll go ahead and say it now. I'm more concerned about the Packers defense in the playoffs than the Packers offense. I trust the best quarterback in the league, a very good running back, very good wide receivers, and an ascending offensive line over a defense that has repeatedly had its pants pulled down and spanked in the playoffs recently. Could the offense be better on the road? Absolutely. They always could. But I expect they will improve. They might not have to worry about that until the NFC Championship game anyway if they can beat the Lions. If the Packers can pull off a win against the Lions, the whole concern about the offense on the road isn't very important in the near future. The defense, however, will remain an issue, imo. Will they honestly be able to stop Tony Romo and Murray? The Falcons? The Lions? I think they can, but I don't trust them. They are very inconsistent, but I do think they are better than in recent years. But I'm not sure how much better.

I already stated the "excuse" for the Bucs game. I don't really think the Packers need any excuses. It was a nice win. But Rodgers recently had the flu and was playing with a hurt calf. Yet the Packers still moved the ball up and down the field and easily won. I really don't get the problem with that game. The Bills game was obviously a screw up. There are things to be concerned about, but will there ever be a time in which there are not? The Packers need to improve but all we can do is hope that they will. All of this is a moot point if they can't beat the Lions at home.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 



Interesting post.

I think the defense is more consistent. When they're shitting themselves, they're shitting themselves. When they're playing decent football, they're playing decent football. When they're dominant, well they're never dominant. lol.

But the offense goes into lulls on a regular basis. Quarter by quarter, drive by drive, they can light it up one second like the greatest show, then they can completely shti themselves for 3 quarters in a row.

If this offense was consistent, we'd go FAR.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”
Rios39
10 years ago

Interesting post.

I think the defense is more consistent. When they're shitting themselves, they're shitting themselves. When they're playing decent football, they're playing decent football. When they're dominant, well they're never dominant. lol.

But the offense goes into lulls on a regular basis. Quarter by quarter, drive by drive, they can light it up one second like the greatest show, then they can completely shti themselves for 3 quarters in a row.

If this offense was consistent, we'd go FAR.

Originally Posted by: nerdmann 



Defense has had a few dominant games actually. 2-3 at the very least


blank
bboystyle
10 years ago

Where exactly did I say I'm not concerned about the offense? I don't think I did. But if I didn't, I'll go ahead and say it now. I'm more concerned about the Packers defense in the playoffs than the Packers offense. I trust the best quarterback in the league, a very good running back, very good wide receivers, and an ascending offensive line over a defense that has repeatedly had its pants pulled down and spanked in the playoffs recently. Could the offense be better on the road? Absolutely. They always could. But I expect they will improve. They might not have to worry about that until the NFC Championship game anyway if they can beat the Lions. If the Packers can pull off a win against the Lions, the whole concern about the offense on the road isn't very important in the near future. The defense, however, will remain an issue, imo. Will they honestly be able to stop Tony Romo and Murray? The Falcons? The Lions? I think they can, but I don't trust them. They are very inconsistent, but I do think they are better than in recent years. But I'm not sure how much better.

I already stated the "excuse" for the Bucs game. I don't really think the Packers need any excuses. It was a nice win. But Rodgers recently had the flu and was playing with a hurt calf. Yet the Packers still moved the ball up and down the field and easily won. I really don't get the problem with that game. The Bills game was obviously a screw up. There are things to be concerned about, but will there ever be a time in which there are not? The Packers need to improve but all we can do is hope that they will. All of this is a moot point if they can't beat the Lions at home.

Originally Posted by: DoddPower 





the offense is the reason why we loss to the Niners last year in the post season,not the defense. Our defense is poised to have a nice run this post season. Look at the offenses we have to face this post season. Aside from the cowboys,there isnt really any elite offenses they'll be facing. This playoff run will ride on our offense.
steveishere
10 years ago

the offense is the reason why we loss to the Niners last year in the post season,not the defense. Our defense is poised to have a nice run this post season. Look at the offenses we have to face this post season. Aside from the cowboys,there isnt really any elite offenses they'll be facing. This playoff run will ride on our offense.

Originally Posted by: bboystyle 



There was no "THE" reason we lost to the 49ers last year. The offense didn't have their best game but the defense also gave up the lead on the drive immediately after literally every scoring drive where our offense took the lead. The defense also gave up a 5 minute 65 yard drive to end the game. You cannot put that game all on the offense. The defenses numbers may have looked all right overall but they pretty much melted under every pressure situation throughout the game.
bboystyle
10 years ago

There was no "THE" reason we lost to the 49ers last year. The offense didn't have their best game but the defense also gave up the lead on the drive immediately after literally every scoring drive where our offense took the lead. The defense also gave up a 5 minute 65 yard drive to end the game. You cannot put that game all on the offense. The defenses numbers may have looked all right overall but they pretty much melted under every pressure situation throughout the game.

Originally Posted by: steveishere 





I'm sorry but our defense only let up 23 points to that niners offense which is impressive especially how badly they've been getting trounce in the playoffs. Our offense on the other hand only put up a pathetic 20 points at home filled with missed throws and dropped passes. I don't care for situation or stats. Only stat that matters is the score board in which our offense was garbage
Fan Shout
dfosterf (3-Jul) : Make sure to send my props to him! A plus move!
Zero2Cool (3-Jul) : My cousin, yes.
dfosterf (3-Jul) : That was your brother the GB press gazette referenced with the red cross draft props thing, yes?
Zero2Cool (2-Jul) : Packers gonna unveil new throwback helmet in few weeks.
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : I know it's Kleiman but this stuff writes itself
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : "Make sure she signs the NDA before asking for a Happy Ending!"
Mucky Tundra (2-Jul) : @NFL_DovKleiman Powerful: Deshaun Watson is taking Shedeur Sanders 'under his wing' as a mentor to the Browns QBs
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Dolphins get (back) Minkah Fitzpatrick in trade
Zero2Cool (30-Jun) : Steelers land Jalen Ramsey via Trade
dfosterf (26-Jun) : I think it would be great to have someone like Tom Grossi or Andy Herman on the Board of Directors so he/they could inform us
dfosterf (26-Jun) : Fair enough, WPR. Thing is, I have been a long time advocate to at least have some inkling of the dynamics within the board.
wpr (26-Jun) : 1st world owners/stockholders problems dfosterf.
Martha Careful (25-Jun) : I would have otherwise admirably served
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Also, no more provision for a write-in candidate, so Martha is off the table at least for this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : You do have to interpret the boring fine print, but all stockholders all see he is on the ballot
dfosterf (25-Jun) : It also says he is subject to another ballot in 2028. I recall nothing of this nature with Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy is on my ballot subject to me penciling him in as a no.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : I thought it used to be we voted for the whatever they called the 45, and then they voted for the seven, and then they voted for Mark Murphy
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Because I was too lazy to change my address, I haven't voted fot years until this year
dfosterf (25-Jun) : of the folks that run this team. I do not recall Mark Murphy being subject to our vote.
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Ed Policy yay or nay is on the pre-approved ballot that we always approve because we are uninformed and lazy, along with all the rest
dfosterf (25-Jun) : Weird question. Very esoteric. For stockholders. Also lengthy. Sorry. Offseason.
Zero2Cool (25-Jun) : Maybe wicked wind chill made it worse?
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : And then he signs with Cleveland in the offseason
Mucky Tundra (25-Jun) : @SharpFootball WR Diontae Johnson just admitted he refused to enter a game in 41° weather last year in Baltimore because he felt “ice cold”
Zero2Cool (24-Jun) : Yawn. Rodgers says he is "pretty sure" this be final season.
Zero2Cool (23-Jun) : PFT claims Packers are having extension talks with Zach Tom, Quay Walker.
Mucky Tundra (20-Jun) : GB-Minnesota 2004 Wild Card game popped up on my YouTube page....UGH
beast (20-Jun) : Hmm 🤔 re-signing Walker before Tom? Sounds highly questionable to me.
Mucky Tundra (19-Jun) : One person on Twitter=cannon law
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Well, to ONE person on Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : According to Tweeter
Zero2Cool (19-Jun) : Packers are working on extension for LT Walker they hope to have done before camp
dfosterf (18-Jun) : E4B landed at Andrews last night
dfosterf (18-Jun) : 101 in a 60
dfosterf (18-Jun) : FAFO
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : one year $4m with incentives to make it up to $6m
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Or Lions
dfosterf (18-Jun) : Beats the hell out of a Vikings signing
Zero2Cool (18-Jun) : Baltimore Ravens now have signed former Packers CB Jaire Alexander.
dfosterf (14-Jun) : TWO magnificent strikes for touchdowns. Lose the pennstate semigeezer non nfl backup
dfosterf (14-Jun) : There was minicamp Thursday. My man Taylor Engersma threw
dfosterf (11-Jun) : There will be a mini camp practice Thursday.
Zero2Cool (11-Jun) : He's been sporting a ring for a while now. It's probably Madonna.
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : We only do the tea before whoopee, it relaxes me.
wpr (10-Jun) : That's awesome Martha.
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : How's the ayahuasca tea he makes, Martha?
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : Turns out he like older women
Martha Careful (10-Jun) : I wasn't supposed to say anything, but yes the word is out and we are happy 😂😂😂
Mucky Tundra (10-Jun) : I might be late on this but Aaron Rodgers is now married
Please sign in to use Fan Shout
2025 Packers Schedule
Sunday, Sep 7 @ 3:25 PM
LIONS
Thursday, Sep 11 @ 7:15 PM
COMMANDERS
Sunday, Sep 21 @ 12:00 PM
Browns
Sunday, Sep 28 @ 7:20 PM
Cowboys
Sunday, Oct 12 @ 3:25 PM
BENGALS
Sunday, Oct 19 @ 3:25 PM
Cardinals
Sunday, Oct 26 @ 7:20 PM
Steelers
Sunday, Nov 2 @ 12:00 PM
PANTHERS
Monday, Nov 10 @ 7:15 PM
EAGLES
Sunday, Nov 16 @ 12:00 PM
Giants
Sunday, Nov 23 @ 12:00 PM
VIKINGS
Thursday, Nov 27 @ 12:00 PM
Lions
Sunday, Dec 7 @ 12:00 PM
BEARS
Sunday, Dec 14 @ 3:25 PM
Broncos
Friday, Dec 19 @ 11:00 PM
Bears
Friday, Dec 26 @ 11:00 PM
RAVENS
Saturday, Jan 3 @ 11:00 PM
Vikings
Recent Topics
4-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

2-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

2-Jul / Fantasy Sports Talk / dfosterf

1-Jul / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

29-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Zero2Cool

25-Jun / Around The NFL / Martha Careful

23-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / Mucky Tundra

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / wpr

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

20-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / beast

18-Jun / Random Babble / Zero2Cool

16-Jun / Green Bay Packers Talk / dfosterf

15-Jun / Random Babble / Martha Careful

14-Jun / Around The NFL / beast

14-Jun / Community Welcome! / dfosterf

Headlines
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 PackersHome.com™. All Rights Reserved.