Dear Ted, please sign Demarcus Ware· Page 2

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

10 years ago

Ware is an outside pass rusher from the Right Side. Clay is an outside pass rusher from the Right Side. Nick Perry is better from the Right side.

I think we need to find somebody who can rush from the Left not pay so we are 3 or 4 deep at or best pass rush area.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

dhazer
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#12

fucking clay matthews was a horrible 1st round draft pick

and raji was terrible his first 2 years just a garbage turd

fuckin bulaga guy is just the worst too

Originally Posted by: gbguy20

please tell me what is so fricken great about Matthews? He is injury prone and not worth the money. besides Rodgers what 1st rounder has been good for more than 2 years under TT?

Just Imagine this for the next 6-9 years. What a ride it will be 🙂 (PS, Zero should charge for this)

QCHuskerFan
Member

10 years ago

#13

please tell me what is so fricken great about Matthews? He is injury prone and not worth the money. besides Rodgers what 1st rounder has been good for more than 2 years under TT?

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Sad. But true, true, true.

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

PackFanWithTwins
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#14

please tell me what is so fricken great about Matthews? He is injury prone and not worth the money. besides Rodgers what 1st rounder has been good for more than 2 years under TT?

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Said last year we way overpaid for Matthews. I have this one thought that keeps popping into the back of my mind. Put Clay on a diet, drop him down about 10 lbs and move him inside to replace Jones.

The world needs ditch diggers too Danny!!!

nerdmann
Premier Member

10 years ago

#15

please tell me what is so fricken great about Matthews? He is injury prone and not worth the money. besides Rodgers what 1st rounder has been good for more than 2 years under TT?

Originally Posted by: dhazer

Problem isn't Ted. Problem is the training staff.

Keep these guys healthy and we win it all.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Wade
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#16

Raji diddn't do shit his 1st year..

2010 was great.. 2011 was good the rest of his career is crap.

Originally Posted by: Laser Gunns

Actually, *half* of 2010 was great. 2011 was overrated, as everyone was basking in the glow of Lombardi trophy #4.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

Wade
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#17

Well, if I had to choose between DeMarcus Ware and Mike Neal, I'd choose Ware.

He may or may not be overrated. But I'd expect more improvement in the defense with him than I expect from further development of Neal's "potential."

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

buckeyepackfan
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#18

Originally Posted by: Wade

Ware signed with The Broncos. 3 years 30mil.

Don't have The numbers on Neal yet but I'm guessing it's not 3 yrs 30 mil.

I was addicted to The Hokey Pokey, but I turned myself around!

mi_keys
Senior Member

10 years ago

#19

Ware signed with The Broncos. 3 years 30mil.

Don't have The numbers on Neal yet but I'm guessing it's not 3 yrs 30 mil.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

I believe Ware also got $20M guaranteed... maybe no one will want Jared Allen and we can get him for something reasonable?

...nah, that won't happen.

Born and bred a cheesehead

Wade
Veteran Member

10 years ago

#20

Ware signed with The Broncos. 3 years 30mil.

Don't have The numbers on Neal yet but I'm guessing it's not 3 yrs 30 mil.

Originally Posted by: buckeyepackfan

Of course not.

But if you restrict yourself to players willing to take Mike Neal dollars, you're most likely to get ... Mike Neals.

Which, IMO, offers no significant improvement over the status quo.

Because it *IS* that status quo.

Which, ahem, sucks.

Drafting Mike Neal for his potential -- that's fine. Re-signing Mike Neal because of continued faith in "potential to improve the team"?

That strikes me as ....

Well, like expecting Dave Kingman won't strike out 2-3 times for every gigantic home-run he hits.

I'm not hung up Ware or Byrd or any one free agent possibility. I'm hung up on the notion that "signing one's own free agents" is sufficient free agency participation when your defense has collectively been a model for suckitude.

And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.
Romans 12:2 (NKJV)

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

Zero2Cool (40m) : I see what you did there Mucky

Zero2Cool (40m) : dammit. 3:25pm

Zero2Cool (40m) : Packers Vikings flexed to 3:35pm

Mucky Tundra (48m) : Upon receiving the news about Luke Musgrave, I immediately fell to the ground

Mucky Tundra (49m) : Yeah baby!

Zero2Cool (1h) : LUKE MUSGRAVE PLAYING TONIGHT~!~~~~WOWHOAAOHAOAA yah

Zero2Cool (2h) : I wanna kill new QB's ... blitz the crap out of them.

beast (2h) : Barry seemed to get too conservative against new QBs, Hafley doesn't have that issue

Zero2Cool (3h) : However, we seem to struggle vs new QB's

Zero2Cool (3h) : Should be moot point, cuz Packers should win tonight.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : ok I stand corrected

Zero2Cool (3h) : Ok, yes, you are right. I see that now how they get 7th

Zero2Cool (3h) : 5th - Packers win out, Vikings lose out. Maybe?

beast (3h) : Saying no to the 6th lock.

beast (3h) : No, with the Commanders beating the Eagles, Packers could have a good chance of 6th or 7th unless the win out

Zero2Cool (3h) : I think if Packers win, they are locked 6th with chance for 5th.

beast (3h) : But it doesn't matter, as the Packers win surely win one of their remaining games

beast (3h) : This is not complex, just someone doesn't want to believe reality

beast (3h) : We already have told you... if Packers lose all their games (they won't, but if they did), and Buccaneers and Falcons win all theirs

Zero2Cool (3h) : I posted it in that Packers and 1 seed thread

Zero2Cool (3h) : I literally just said it.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : show us a scenario where Pack don't get in? bet you can't

Zero2Cool (3h) : Falcons, Buccaneers would need to win final two games.

Zero2Cool (3h) : Yes, if they win one of three, they are lock. If they lose out, they can be eliminated.

packerfanoutwest (3h) : as I just said,,gtheyh are in no matter what

Zero2Cool (4h) : Packers should get in. I just hope it's not 7th seed. Feels dirty.

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If packers lose out, no matter what, they are in

packerfanoutwest (4h) : both teams can not male the playoffs....falcon hold the tie breaker

packerfanoutwest (4h) : if bucs win out they win their division

beast (4h) : Fine, Buccaneers and Falcons can get ahead of us

packerfanoutwest (4h) : falcons are already ahead of us

beast (4h) : Packers will get in

beast (4h) : If Packers lose the rest of their games and Falcons win the rest of theirs, they could pass us... but not gonna happen

packerfanoutwest (4h) : they still are in the playoffs

packerfanoutwest (4h) : If Packers lose the remaining games,,,,at 10-7

Zero2Cool (6h) : We can say it. We don't play.

Mucky Tundra (7h) : But to say they are in is looking past the Saints

Mucky Tundra (7h) : That said, their odds are very favorable with a >99% chance of making the playoffs entering this week's games

Mucky Tundra (7h) : Packers are not in and have not clinched a playoff spot.

buckeyepackfan (8h) : Packers are in, they need to keep winning to improve their seed#.

Mucky Tundra (17h) : Getting help would have been nice, but helping ourselves should always be the plan

beast (17h) : Too bad Seahawks couldn't beat Vikings

bboystyle (17h) : We just need to win Monday night and were in

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Or ties, but let's be real here

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Other scenario was Falcons+Rams losses

Mucky Tundra (20h) : Needed a Falcons loss for a Seahawk loss to clinch

buckeyepackfan (21h) : Am I wring in saying if Tge Vikings beat The Seahawks, The Packers clinch?

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : Agreed; you stinks

Zero2Cool (21-Dec) : I'm not beating anyone. I stinks.

Mucky Tundra (21-Dec) : rough injury for tank dell. guy can't catch abreak

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

Saturday, Jan 4 @ 11:00 PM

BEARS