well we knew Coleman wasn't going to be the answer. We just didn't know who they would pick up for the back up job.
Originally Posted by: wpr
I, for one, did NOT know or think that.
The ineffectiveness of Coleman in preseason is mostly attributable to playing with backups. I do not see Wallace as an improvement at all over either Coleman or Young - Harrell? 50/50 on that one.
As I and others have said, the Packers O and D without Aaron Rodgers ain't gonna threaten anybody. Thus, short of getting Peyton or Brady or Brees for a backup, the season would be down the toilet if Rodgers went down - no more so with Coleman than with anybody else.
At least Vince Young could have run for his life and gained some that way. I don't know, is Seneca Wallace a decent runner? I've never heard that he is.
Anyway, the season ain't down the drain just because we got a different clipboard holder.
Expressing the Good Normal Views of Good Normal Americans.
If Anything I Say Smacks of Extremism, Please Tell Me EXACTLY What.