[2012] Green Bay Packers at Minnesota Vikings· Page 2

gbguy20
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#11

idk where else to post this

BAD EMAIL because the address couldn ot be found, or is unable to receive mail.

flep
Member

12 years ago

#12

CMIII will stop AP.

Packers will rack up big yardage on the ground.

A-Rod will have a quiet day as we won't need to pass much.

Packers 27 - 17 Queens.

Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years

I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!

vikesrule
Registered

12 years ago

#13

CMIII will stop AP.

Packers will rack up big yardage on the ground.

A-Rod will have a quiet day as we won't need to pass much.

Originally Posted by: flep

Ah Phil, my delusional British amigo, your sense of humor slays me sometimes.

Especially the Matthews stopping Peterson part....that is truly priceless.

nerdmann
Premier Member

12 years ago

#14

This game isn't a gimme. The Vikings will be playing like cornered rats. They know that this is it. They lose this game, they're out unless other teams beat other teams and you know the rest.

Plus, we're not so dominant in MN. In Lambeau, yeah, we'll win easily like we always do. Last year, we beat them 45-7 at home and only won by 6 pts there. I see a closer game than I like to see.

It comes down to our OL vs their DL. If we win that battle, we should win easily. If not, they could win.

AD will get his yards. Ponder will give us some 💓 like he always does.

Originally Posted by: zombieslayer

We got this.

This game will show us if this team really has its shit together or if the Titans were just that bad. If we want to go on to the Superbowl, we need to have our shit together.

We'll win, but it should be decisive. If it's another "MM squeaker," with three quarters of lull, that will show me that we're still looking for ways to defeat ourselves.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#15

I'd like the Packers to win, hell I always like the Packers to win but I'm not so sure I want this team to have a bye week if their 1st game would be at Lambeau anyway.
I really don't know how the scenario would play out if the Packers lost this game.

Help me here.

Originally Posted by: yooperfan

If GB loses they host a wild card game next weekend. I believe it would be against the 6 seed. After that win they would head to SF then on to Atlanta.

flep
Member

12 years ago

#16

Ah Phil, my delusional British amigo, your sense of humor slays me sometimes.

Especially the Matthews stopping Peterson part....that is truly priceless.

Originally Posted by: vikesrule

Go on then Vikes "Cajones time".

If AP gets the record or the Vikes win I'll have an avatar of your choice for the playoffs (well at least until the Vikes lose - So only one week then)

If the prediction comes true I'll just accept your humble apologies and that will suffice..........Delusional Brit that I am.

Formed Merseyside Nighthawks. British Champions 1992. Packer fan for 32 years

I feel very wrong now!!!!!!!!!

yooperfan
Veteran Member

12 years ago

#17

Thanks WPR.

Pack93z
Select Member Topic Starter

12 years ago

#18

If GB loses they host a wild card game next weekend. I believe it would be against the 6 seed. After that win they would head to SF then on to Atlanta.

Originally Posted by: wpr

And if everything holds true.. that 6 seed would be... ah yes, the Vikes.

"The oranges are dry; the apples are mealy; and the papayas... I don't know what's going on with the papayas!"

wpr
Preferred Member

12 years ago

#19

And if everything holds true.. that 6 seed would be... ah yes, the Vikes.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

which is why I said GB would win.

nerdmann
Premier Member

12 years ago

#20

And if everything holds true.. that 6 seed would be... ah yes, the Vikes.

Originally Posted by: Pack93z

That's true. We get two cracks at them.

Meanwhile, to get past us, they'd have to beat us TWICE.

Ain't happening.

“Winning is not a sometime thing, it is an all the time thing. You don't do things right once in a while…you do them right all the time.”

Important Information:

The PACKERSHOME uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. More Details Close

Fan Shout

wpr (15h) : 7 days

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : sounds like Packers don't get good compensation, Jaire staying

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Nobody coming up with a keep, but at x amount

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Trade, cut or keep

dfosterf (16-Apr) : that from Jaire

dfosterf (16-Apr) : My guess is the Packers floated the concept of a reworked contract via his agent and agent got a f'

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Yes, and that is why I think Rob worded it how he did. Rather than say "agent"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Same laws apply. Agent must present such an offer to Jaire. Cannot accept or reject without presenting it

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : I'm thinking that is why Rob worded it how he did.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The Packers can certainly still make the offer to the agent

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Laws of agency and definition of fiduciary responsibility

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Jaire is open to a reduced contract without Jaire's permission

dfosterf (16-Apr) : The agent would arguably violate the law if he were to tell the Packers

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : That someone ... likely the agent.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : So, Jaire has not been offered nor rejected a pay reduction, but someone says he'd decline.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovksy says t was direct communication with someone familiar with Jaire’s line of thinking at that moment.

Zero2Cool (16-Apr) : Demovsky just replied to me a bit ago. Jaire hasn't said it.

dfosterf (16-Apr) : Of course, that depends on the definition of "we"

dfosterf (16-Apr) : We have been told that they haven't because he wouldn't accept it. I submit we don't know that

dfosterf (16-Apr) : What is the downside in making a calculated reduced offer to Jaire?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers are receiving interest in Jaire Alexander but a trade is not imminent

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Jalen Ramsey wants to be traded. He's never happy is he?

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : two 1sts in 2022 and two 2nd's in 2023 and 2024

Zero2Cool (15-Apr) : Packers had fortunate last three drafts.

dfosterf (15-Apr) : I may have to move

dfosterf (15-Apr) : My wife just told the ancient Japanese sushi dude not enough rice under his fish

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I think a dozen is what I need

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Go fund me for this purpose just might work. A dozen nurses show up at 1265 to provide mental health assistance.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Maybe send a crew of Angels to the Packers draft room on draft day.

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : I am the Angel that gets visited.

dfosterf (14-Apr) : Visiting Angels has a pretty good reputation

Zero2Cool (14-Apr) : what

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : WINNING IT, not someone else losing it. The best victory though was re-uniting with his wife

Martha Careful (14-Apr) : The manner in which he won it was just amazing and wonderful. First blowing the lead then getting back, then blowing it. But ultimately

Zero2Cool (12-Apr) : I'm guessing since the thumb was broken, he wasn't feeling it.

dfosterf (10-Apr) : Looking for guidance. Not feeling the thumb.

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : If they knew about it or not

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : I don't recall that he did which is why I asked.

Zero2Cool (10-Apr) : Guessing they probably knew. Did he have cast or something on?

Mucky Tundra (10-Apr) : Did they know that at the time or was that something the realized afterwards?

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Van Ness played most of season with broken thumb

wpr (9-Apr) : yay

Zero2Cool (9-Apr) : Mark Murphy says Steelers likely to protect Packers game. Meaning, no Ireland

Zero2Cool (8-Apr) : Struggling to figure out what text editor options are needed and which are 'nice to have'

Mucky Tundra (8-Apr) : *CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP*

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : WR who said he'd break Xavier Worthy 40 time...and ran slower than you

Mucky Tundra (2-Apr) : Who?

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Texas’ WR Isaiah Bond is scheduled to visit the Bills, Browns, Chiefs, Falcons, Packers and Titans starting next week.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : Spotting ball isn't changing, only measuring distance is, Which wasn't the issue.

Zero2Cool (2-Apr) : The spotting of the ball IS the issue. Not the chain gang.

Please sign in to use Fan Shout

2024 Packers Schedule

Friday, Sep 6 @ 7:15 PM

Eagles

29 - 34

Sunday, Sep 15 @ 12:00 PM

COLTS

16 - 10

Sunday, Sep 22 @ 12:00 PM

Titans

30 - 14

Sunday, Sep 29 @ 12:00 PM

VIKINGS

29 - 31

Sunday, Oct 6 @ 3:25 PM

Rams

24 - 19

Sunday, Oct 13 @ 12:00 PM

CARDINALS

34 - 13

Sunday, Oct 20 @ 12:00 PM

TEXANS

24 - 22

Sunday, Oct 27 @ 12:00 PM

Jaguars

30 - 27

Sunday, Nov 3 @ 3:25 PM

LIONS

14 - 24

Sunday, Nov 17 @ 12:00 PM

Bears

20 - 19

Sunday, Nov 24 @ 3:25 PM

49ERS

38 - 10

Thursday, Nov 28 @ 7:20 PM

DOLPHINS

30 - 17

Thursday, Dec 5 @ 7:15 PM

Lions

31 - 34

Sunday, Dec 15 @ 7:20 PM

Seahawks

30 - 13

Monday, Dec 23 @ 7:15 PM

SAINTS

34 - 0

Sunday, Dec 29 @ 3:25 PM

Vikings

25 - 27

Sunday, Jan 5 @ 12:00 PM

BEARS

22 - 24

Sunday, Jan 12 @ 3:30 PM

Eagles

10 - 22