Did you even read my take on the article or just assume that I agreed 100% with it?
Tin foil hat aside the article articulates a very thought provoking angle that MUST NOT BE IGNORED. Yet it is being ignored. Why?
Sure, the writer may have used every psychological tact in the book to write his article but that does not give his questions and point any less value.
Destroying one's credibility doesn't mean their agenda is any less true. All you are doing is making a distraction and making things more complicated than they need to be.
Originally Posted by: Formo
Yes, I read your take, of course! Why won't you read mine and comprehend what I'm saying? And there is no 'may have' used psychological tact, it's freaking clear as day! I've addressed the "questions" he brings up by the fact that the world we live in is a "submit news regardless of accuracy" first and fix it later to get it on the internet first. Jesus fucking Christ, did you even read what I said? Are you intentionally being obtuse?
Look, you're a smart person, fanhood aside, I shouldn't have to draw you a picture. Again, please, do NOT fall for that kind of stuff! It is brainwashing you into doubting things predicated on the inaccurate journalistic society!
Fuck it, you want to let some wordy schmuck better you, go ahead. It's your choice, yes, your CHOICE to let someone dupe you.
Again, the aforementioned (in earlier post) author is an exact consequence of piss poor journalism that pisses me off to no end. News stations pump out ANYTHING regarding the subject and then you get some clever pinhead wording their inaccuracies into some damn conspiracy. So fucking annoying how irresponsible some people are just for the sake of getting attention.